For: | Boyapati R, Majumdar A, Robertson M. AIMS65: A promising upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk score but further validation required. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14515-14516 [PMID: 25339841 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14515] |
---|---|
URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i39/14515.htm |
Number | Citing Articles |
1 |
Nurullah İshak Işık, Attila Beştemir, Gülhan Kurtoğlu Çelik, Ahmed Enes Demirci, Safa Dönmez, Yunus Yatmaz, Yusuf Yavuz, Halil Dogan, Yavuz Yigit. Comparative Performance Analysis of AIMS65, Pre-endoscopic Rockall, Glasgow-Blatchford, and Modified ABC Scores in Emergency Department Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 2025; doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.016
|
2 |
Marc Nguyen-Tat, Constantin Cornelius, Arthur Hoffman, Achim Tresch, Joerg Krey, Ralf Kiesslich, Peter Robert Galle, Johannes Wilhelm Rey. The Manchester Triage System (MTS): a score for emergency management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie 2018; 56(05): 479 doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124194
|
3 |
Min Zhong, Wan Jun Chen, Xiao Ye Lu, Jie Qian, Chang Qing Zhu. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study. Journal of Digestive Diseases 2016; 17(12): 820 doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12433
|
4 |
S.F. Zhao, Q.Y. Qu, K. Feng, M.Q. Song. Comparison of the AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford score for risk stratification in elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. European Geriatric Medicine 2017; 8(1): 37 doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2016.10.002
|