Deng HX, Liu YZ, Yang L, Liu JJ, Jia FN, Zhao XL, Xia XZ, Zhang XY, Du XD. Thyroid-stimulating hormone levels and suicide attempts in Chinese patients with first-episode drug-naïve major depressive disorder. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(6): 116435 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i6.116435]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
From a submitting author's perspective, World Journal of Psychiatry has been a genuine pleasure to work with. The online submission system is straightforward and user‑friendly, saving considerable time during manuscript preparation. The editorial office responds promptly to inquiries, and the review process is both efficient and transparent — typically completing within a reasonable timeframe. The reviewers provide detailed, constructive, and respectful feedback that genuinely helps improve the manuscript, rather than merely pointing out flaws. The editors maintain clear communication at every stage, from initial check to final decision. Once accepted, the production team handles copyediting and proofreading professionally, and the open‑access publication ensures quick online visibility. Overall, World Journal of Psychiatry offers a supportive, rigorous, and author‑centered publishing experience, which makes me happy to submit my future work here.