Zhou XC, Qu JC. Potential mechanisms and research progress of animal-assisted interventions for autism spectrum disorder. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 124210 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.124210]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
This was my first publication in the *World Journal of Psychiatry*, and I have been very satisfied with the overall publishing experience. The peer-review process was constructive and effective, helping me improve the quality, rigor, and clarity of my manuscript.
I am particularly grateful to the editorial team, including S-Editor Hu XY, L-Editor A, and P-Editors Lei YY, Xiang Li, and Wang Cai-Hong, for their professionalism, meticulous work, timely communication, and assistance in keeping me informed of the manuscript's progress throughout the publication process.
One area that could be improved is the overall publication timeline, which was 142 days. Reducing the publication cycle to within 120 days, where feasible, could further enhance the timeliness of publication and accelerate the dissemination of research findings.
Finally, I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the editors, reviewers, and production team for their time, care, and support throughout the entire process. I look forward to submitting my future research to the *World Journal of Psychiatry* and would be pleased to consider it as a priority journal for my forthcoming work.