BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Wang LF, Sun YX, Bian JY, Zhang T. Clinical study of Xianjun formula combined with standard western therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(6): 119607 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.119607]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial team and reviewers of the World Journal of Clinical Oncology (WJCO) for giving us this valuable opportunity to publish our work. Throughout the submission, revision, and acceptance process, the reviewers’ detailed, rigorous, and professional comments significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. We are especially grateful to the editorial office for their efficient communication and patient guidance, which gave us a deep appreciation of the professional and standardized academic environment at Baishideng Publishing Group. The successful publication of this study would not have been possible without the dedicated efforts of every team member, as well as the constructive suggestions from the anonymous reviewers. We will continue our research in this field and strive to contribute more evidence‑based findings to the integrative treatment of colorectal cancer. Once again, we extend our heartfelt thanks to all the editors, reviewers, and colleagues who have supported us along the way. THANKS FOR ALL YOUR CAREFUL HELP!