BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Xing YR, Wang SF, Dai JJ, Xu XG, Mao WJ. Unlocking the metastatic switch: The RHEB-CSF1R complex ignites epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer by autophagy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 119680 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.119680]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
The format of the article before submission does not need to meet the requirements of the magazine format, and can be modified after formal editing or acceptance. Modifying the format not only slows down the manuscript review process, but also affects the rapid publication of new reports. After removing unimportant submission requirements such as formatting, not only will the quantity of manuscripts increase, but the quality will also correspondingly improve, which is conducive to the rapid communication and publication of new discoveries.