Xu AP, She SP, Xiao YS, Lang J, Yuan JF, Zeng YF. Nuclear localization of proteasome subunit beta 5 serves as an independent prognostic biomarker and promotes invasion in colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 122057 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.122057]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the editorial office and the reviewers for their efficient and professional handling of our manuscript. The editorial team processed our submission promptly with great care and attention to detail, and the reviewers returned their constructive comments in a timely manner. Their feedback was not only insightful but also delivered in a respectful and author-friendly tone, which we truly appreciated throughout the entire process. However, we did encounter one technical issue: the proof PDF could not be downloaded from the F6Publishing system, which caused some inconvenience during the proofreading stage. We would kindly suggest that the platform be checked to ensure such issues are resolved in the future. Overall, we are very satisfied with the editorial and review process, and we thank the entire team for their hard work and dedication.