Zhou MY, Fang RF, Tang H, Xia XX, Xie Q, Yao DF, Sai WL, Yao M. Activated cGAS-STING signaling promotes malignancy in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease via mitochondrial DNA and immune cell dysfunction. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(7): 121423 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.121423]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We appreciate the thoroughness of your editorial team and the timely communication at each stage. The online submission process of WJG is convenient and fast, the publication rules are standardized, and the review cycle is satisfactory. Thank you for your detailed comments and for providing valuable insights throughout the review process. Your constructive feedback has significantly enhanced the quality and clarity of our manuscript.The professionalism and rigor of the publishing process were exemplary, ensuring a smooth and collaborative experience. The peer reviewers are professional, the review report is detailed, and the content of the review report is fair and objective. Article editing and typesetting quality is high. WJG has strong credibility.