Wang SF, Guo HC, Peng XW. Beyond adenomatous polyposis coli: Redefining the genetic architecture of familial adenomatous polyposis through recurrent variants of uncertain significance. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(32): 117091 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.117091]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
The peer review process organized by the journal was exceptionally smooth, convenient, and efficient. The insightful and professional comments from the reviewers were invaluable in improving our study and greatly enhanced the overall rigor of the manuscript. We extend our deepest appreciation to the editors for their hard work and excellent communication throughout the process, and to the reviewers for sharing their profound academic knowledge. The successful publication of this article is truly a result of the outstanding collaborative efforts between the authors, the editorial team, and the peer reviewers.