Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 8, 2025; 6(3): 108281
Published online Sep 8, 2025. doi: 10.37126/aige.v6.i3.108281
Published online Sep 8, 2025. doi: 10.37126/aige.v6.i3.108281
Table 1 Comparison of two machine learning models
Supervised model | Unsupervised model | |
Date dependency | High-quality annotations | Label-efficient |
Clinical applicability | Task-specific optimization | Exploratory applications |
Interpretability | Moderate (via feature mapping) | Low (abstract feature hierarchy) |
Deployment | Device-specific optimization | Generalizable frameworks |
Table 2 Comparison of the effects of machine learning-based endoscopic image recognition in different diseases
Sensitivity (range) | Specificity (range) | Key influencing factors | |
Barrett’s esophagus | 85%-92% | 78%-88% | Complexity mucosal texture, annotation consistency |
Early gastric cancer | 89%-95% | 82%-91% | Lesion size, endoscopic image resolution |
Ulcerative colitis | 76%-84% | 88%-93% | Subjectivity of inflammation activity scoring, data heterogeneity |
Colorectal polyps | 92%-97% | 90%-95% | Polyp morphological diversity, real-time detection algorithm efficiency |
- Citation: Ding JC, Zhang J. Endoscopic image analysis assisted by machine learning: Algorithmic advancements and clinical uses. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 6(3): 108281
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2689-7164/full/v6/i3/108281.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.37126/aige.v6.i3.108281