BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Aug 8, 2026; 7(2): 120803
Published online Aug 8, 2026. doi: 10.35712/aig.120803
Table 1 Summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate
Ref.
Study type
Number of studies/participants
Main outcomes
Key findings
Khalaf et al[10], 2025Systematic review and meta-analysis7 RCTs/5427 participantsADR, PDRAI-assisted colonoscopy significantly increased ADR and PDR. Most additional lesions detected were small polyps, while detection of advanced adenomas and pedunculated lesions was lower
Huang et al[15], 2022Meta-analysis10 RCTs/6629 participantsADR, PDR, lesions per colonoscopyAI significantly improved ADR and PDR. Higher numbers of adenomas, polyps, and sessile serrated lesions were detected per colonoscopy, with benefits across most lesion sizes and locations except pedunculated lesions and cecal lesions
Makar et al[11], 2025Updated meta-analysis28 RCTs/23861 participantsADR, adenoma miss rateCADe increased ADR by approximately 20% and reduced adenoma miss rates by 55%. Benefits were consistent across platforms, endoscopist experience levels, and clinical settings
Hassan et al[16], 2021Meta-analysis5 RCTs/4354 participantsADRCADe consistently demonstrated benefit (36.6% vs 25.2%) compared with conventional colonoscopy, with improvements across different lesion sizes, morphologies, and anatomical locations
Hassan et al[12], 2023Systematic review and meta-analysis21 RCTs/18232 participantsADR, adenoma miss rateCADe-assisted colonoscopy significantly increased ADR (44.0% vs 35.9%) and reduced adenoma miss rates compared with standard colonoscopy
Soleymanjahi et al[13], 2024Systematic review and meta-analysis44 RCTs/36201 participantsADR, adenomas per colonoscopyCADe was associated with increased detection and increased the average number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy
Adiwinata et al[17], 2023Systematic review and meta-analysisMultiple studiesADRAI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR with a pooled odds ratio of 1.58, confirming a clear detection advantage over conventional colonoscopy
Table 2 Summary of randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical performance of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy
Ref.
Study design
Participants
AI system/intervention
Main outcomes
Key findings
Repici et al[23], 2020Multicenter randomized trial685 patientsGI-genius CADe systemADR, adenomas per colonoscopyAI-assisted colonoscopy significantly increased ADR (54.8% vs 40.4%) and adenomas detected per colonoscopy, mainly due to improved detection of small adenomas ≤ 9 mm without increasing withdrawal time
Seager et al[24], 2024Multicenter randomized control trial (COLO-DETECT trial)Not specified in textGI-genius CADe systemADR, adenomas per procedureAI significantly improved ADR (56.6% vs 48.4%) and mean adenomas per procedure without increasing adverse events
Nakashima et al[25], 2023Randomized trial415 patientsCADe-assisted colonoscopyADR, adenoma miss rateComputer-aided detection improved ADR (59.4% vs 47.6%) and reduced adenoma miss rates in the rectosigmoid colon without prolonging examination time
Wang et al[26], 2020Double-blind randomized trial962 patientsCADe systemADRADR significantly improved (34% vs 28%). AI particularly enhanced detection of subtle lesions such as small, flat, or partially hidden polyps
Lau et al[27], 2024Randomized trial766 patientsComputer-aided detection -assisted colonoscopyADRCADe significantly increased ADR among endoscopists-in-training and improved detection of small adenomas in both right and left colon
Xu et al[28], 2021Randomized trial2352 patientsAI-assisted colonoscopyPolyps per colonoscopyAI increased detection of additional polyps per colonoscopy and improved identification of diminutive and flat lesions
Glissen Brown et al[29], 2022Tandem colonoscopy randomized contral trialNot specified in textCADe-systemAdenoma miss rateCADe significantly reduced adenoma miss rate (20.1% vs 31.3%) and increased adenomas detected per colonoscopy
Luo et al[30], 2021Randomized back-to-back colonoscopy study150 patientsReal-time AI polyp detection systemPDRAI significantly improved polyp detection rate, mainly through improved detection of diminutive polyps


Write to the Help Desk