BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Bredt LC, Peres LAB. Artificial neural network for prediction of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2(5): 51-59 [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i5.51]
Reader's ID:
04232460
Submitted on:
November 03, 2021, 04:09
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
The article published in the journal titled Artificial neural network for prediction of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma had higher scope in futuristic healthcare demands. Further machine learning might help selecting diagnostic procedures with high predictive power and thereby contribute to the improvement of clinical guidelines. Recurrent neural network (RNN), developed by the Google subsidiary company DeepMind, that uses clinical data to predict a time course of the probability that a patient will develop acute kidney failure also favoring the utility of similar scope of research. I congratulate the author for the best work.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.
Author's Reply:
Replied on April 01, 2022, 00:24
I would like to thank you for the comments on my manuscript, I totally agree about the potential application of ANNs and contribution to the improvement of clinical guidelines due its high predictive power for selecting diagnostic procedures and accessing treatment response.