Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 28, 2021; 9(6): 585-597
Published online Dec 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i6.585
Published online Dec 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i6.585
Table 1 Agreement of studies included by Zhao K and Guo Y
Zhao K | Guo Y | Total | |
+ | - | ||
+ | 4 | 3 | 7 |
- | 2 | 176 | 179 |
Total | 6 | 179 | 185 |
Table 2 Characteristics of studies used to perform the meta-analysis
Ref. | Publication | Fingolimod group | Types of stroke | Age (mean ± SD) | Sex (male %) | Dose of fingolimod | Conclusion |
Fu et al[15] | 2014 | 11 | AIS | 62.3 ± 8.0 | 73 | 0.5 mg/d orally, 3 consecutive days after hospitalization | It could safely limit secondary tissue injury, decrease microvascular permeability, attenuate neurological deficits, and promote recovery. |
Fu et al[16] | 2014 | 11 | ICH | 60.7 ± 12.3 | 36 | 0.5 mg/d orally, 3 consecutive days after hospitalization | It could safely reduce PHE, attenuate neurologic deficits, and promote recovery. |
Zhu et al[17] | 2015 | 22 | AIS | 60.0 ± 2.5 | 59 | 0.5 mg/d orally, 3 consecutive days after hospitalization | In this pilot study, combination therapy of fingolimod and alteplase was well tolerated, which attenuated reperfusion injury and improved clinical outcomes in AIS patients. |
Tian et al[18] | 2018 | 23 | AIS | 67 ± 6.7 | 39 | 0.5 mg/d orally, 3 consecutive days after hospitalization | Fingolimod may enhance the efficacy of alteplase administration in the 4.5- to 6-h time window in patients with a proximal cerebral arterial occlusion and salvageable penumbral tissue by promoting both anterograde reperfusion and retrograde collateral flow. |
Table 3 Agreement of data extraction between Zhao K and Guo Y
Zhao K | Guo Y | Total | |
+ | - | ||
+ | 16 | 5 | 21 |
- | 3 | 20 | 23 |
Total | 19 | 25 | 44 |
Table 4 Changes of T-lymphocytes with cluster of differentiation 8 expression/infarction or hematoma volume/modified Barthel index scores in the fingolimod and control groups
Ref. | Size of fingolimod group | Fingolimod group | Size of control group | Control group |
CD8+ T cell count (mean ± SD, × 106/mL)1 | ||||
Fu et al[15] | 11 | -0.16 ± 0.04 | 11 | 0.08 ± 0.08 |
Tian et al[18] | 23 | -0.09 ± 0.02 | 23 | -0.02 ± 0.02 |
Lesion Volume (mean ± SD, mL)2 | ||||
Fu et al[15] | 11 | 9.91 ± 79.62 | 11 | 25.45 ± 75.45 |
Fu et al[16] | 11 | -1.97 ± 6.25 | 12 | -1.35 ± 1.77 |
mBI score (mean ± SD)3 | ||||
Fu et al[15] | 11 | 72.7 ± 7.5 | 11 | 45.3 ± 10.9 |
Fu et al[16] | 11 | 75.2 ± 4.7 | 12 | 65.4 ± 4.8 |
Table 5 Complications and adverse events in the fingolimod and control groups
Ref. | Size of fingolimod group | Events of fingolimod group | Size of control group | Events of control group | Risk ratio (95%CI) |
Fever | |||||
Fu et al[15] | 11 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 1 (0.16, 6.08) |
Fu et al[16] | 11 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 0.64 (0.12, 3.34) |
Zhu et al[17] | 22 | 5 | 25 | 5 | 1.15 (0.29, 4.51) |
Suspected lung infection | |||||
Fu et al[15] | 11 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 1 (0.16, 6.08) |
Fu et al[16] | 11 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 0.64 (0.12, 3.34) |
Zhu et al[17] | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1.17 (0.21, 6.39) |
Adverse events occurring at least once | |||||
Fu et al[15] | 11 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 1 (0.16, 6.08) |
Fu et al[16] | 11 | 4 | 12 | 6 | 0.72 (0.12, 4.38) |
Zhu et al[17] | 22 | 6 | 25 | 8 | 0.84 (0.25, 2.81) |
Tian et al[18] | 23 | 3 | 23 | 4 | 0.76 (0.15, 3.81) |
Other serious events | |||||
Hemorrhage of digestive tract | |||||
Zhu et al[17] | 22 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 0.42 (0.04, 4.30) |
Cerebral hernia | |||||
Tian et al[18] | 23 | 2 | 23 | 6 | 0.35 (0.06, 1.90) |
Bradycardia | |||||
Fu et al[16] | 11 | 1 | 12 | 0 | N/A |
Atrial flutter | |||||
Tian et al[18] | 23 | 2 | 23 | 0 | N/A |
Thrombocytopenia | |||||
Tian et al[18] | 23 | 2 | 23 | 0 | N/A |
Table 6 Overall standard mean difference or pooled risk ratio via random-effects model and pooled risk ratio of remaining studies after the study with the highest quality is omitted
Method | Overall SMD or RR (95%CI) | Test of heterogeneity | |
I2 (%) | P | ||
Random-effects model | |||
CD8+ T cells | -3.59 (-4.37, -2.80) | 0.0 | 0.737 |
Lesion volume | -0.17 (-0.75, 0.42) | 0.0 | 0.917 |
mBI score | 2.43 (1.59, 3.26) | 10.6 | 0.290 |
RR of fever | 0.93 (0.37, 2.32) | 0.0 | 0.864 |
RR of suspected lung infection | 0.90 (0.33, 2.43) | 0.0 | 0.876 |
RR of adverse events occurring at least once | 0.82 (0.36, 1.87) | 0.0 | 0.995 |
Article deleted | |||
Zhu et al[17] (RR of fever) | 0.78 (0.23, 2.68) | 0.0 | 0.723 |
Zhu et al[17] (RR of suspected lung infection) | 0.78 (0.23, 2.68) | 0.0 | 0.723 |
Tian et al[18] (RR of adverse events occurring at least once) | 0.84 (0.33, 2.18) | 0.0 | 0.969 |
- Citation: Zhao K, Guo Y, Yang MF, Zhang Q. Efficacy and safety of fingolimod in stroke: A systemic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2021; 9(6): 585-597
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v9/i6/585.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v9.i6.585