BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 18, 2026; 14(2): 121918
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v14.i2.121918
Table 1 Characteristics and key outcomes of included studies
Ref.
Study design
n (sema/control)
Semaglutide dose
Follow-up
Mean age (years)
Women (%)
Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Diabetes at baseline
Mean LVEF (%)
Primary PRO endpoint
Baseline KCCQ score
KCCQ treatment effect
Pooled RCT effect (fixed-effects)
Blinding status
Risk of bias (tool)
Population
Sponsorship
Kosiborod et al[4]Double-blind RCT263/2662.4 mg SC weekly52 weeks695637Excluded57KCCQ-CSSCSS 60 pts+7.8 pts (95%CI: 4.8-10.9)7.36 pts (95%CI: 5.32-9.40; I2 = 0%)Double-blindLow (RoB 2)White, Western, BMI ≥ 30Industry (Novo Nordisk)
Kosiborod et al[5]Double-blind RCT310/3062.4 mg SC weekly52 weeks694537Required (T2D)55KCCQ-CSSCSS 60 pts+7.0 pts (95%CI: 4.3-9.8)7.36 pts (95%CI: 5.32-9.40; I2 = 0%)Double-blindLow (RoB 2)White, Western, BMI ≥ 30Industry (Novo Nordisk)
Pérez-Velasco et al[6]Prospective cohort (PSM)203/2030.5-1.0 mg SC weekly24 months765935Required (T2D)≥ 50KCCQ-TSSTSS 54 pts+14 pts between-groupNA (excluded from pooling)Open-labelModerate-to-high (ROBINS-I)Spanish, BMI ≥ 30, T2DNot explicitly reported


Write to the Help Desk