Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 18, 2023; 11(5): 196-217
Published online Jun 18, 2023. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v11.i5.196
Figure 1
Figure 1 PRISMA 2020 flow diagram showing study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Forest plots showing the prevalence of using disposable sanitary pads. A: Forest plot shows the prevalence of using disposable sanitary pads across 32 studies; B: Forest plot shows the prevalence of using disposable sanitary pads in low-middle-income countries (LMICs) and non-LMICs, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plots exploring menstrual education and hygiene management practices. A: Forest plot for the prevalence of having knowledge/awareness on menstruation before menarche across 11 studies; B: Forest plot for the prevalence of good menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practice across ten studies; C: Forest plot for the rural-urban difference of MHM practice level (good/bad).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plot for the difference of menstrual hygiene management. A: Forest plot for the difference of menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practice level (good/bad) between two age groups; B: Forest plot for difference of MHM practice level (good/bad) among adolescent girls with uneducated and educated father; C: Forest plot for difference of MHM practice level (good/bad) among adolescent girls with uneducated and educated mother. Available in Supplemental material.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Forest plots showing the differences in menstrual hygiene management across various factors. A: Forest plot for difference of menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practice level (good/bad) among adolescent girls without and with pocket money; B: Forest plot for difference of MHM practice level (good/bad) among adolescent girls of having no and having discussion about menstruation with parents. Available in Supplementary material; C: Forest plot for the difference of MHM practice level (good/bad) among adolescent girls with orthodox and protestant; D: Forest plot for difference of MHM practice level (good/bad) among adolescent girls with protestant and Muslim. Available in Supplementary material; E: Forest plot for difference of MHM practice level (good/bad) among adolescent girls with orthodox and Muslim. Available in Supplemental material.