BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Oliveira Cunha MCS, Dutra FCS, Cavaleiro Brito LMM, Costa RF, Gaspar MWG, Sousa DF, Moura de Araújo MF, Queiroz MVO. Disordered eating behaviour and eating disorder among adolescents with type 1 diabetes: An integrative review. World J Meta-Anal 2022; 10(5): 244-254 [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v10.i5.244]
Reader's ID:
04621382
Submitted on:
November 10, 2022, 13:55
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
The manuscript touched an important area of Medicine in an important age group, investigation eating disorders is of great importance among adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The authors introduced their projects, presented their findings, discussed them, and reached a conclusion. Eating disorders are common, when co-exist with diabetes they exacerbate each other deleterious consequences. Importantly, adolescent might decrease the dose or omit insulin in an attempt to reduce weight, resulting in poor glycemic control or even ketoacidosis (diabulimia). Raising the awareness of eating disorders among patients with diabetes is vital to avoid acute and chronic diabetes complications. Hyder Mirghani, Professor of Internal Medicine and Endocrine, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.