Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Methodol. Jun 26, 2014; 4(2): 123-132
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.123
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.123
Table 1 Prostate cancer working group-2 suggested outcome measures for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer trials
Variable | Outcome measure |
Progression criteria | |
PSA | A favorable effect on PSA may be delayed for 12 wk or more, even for a cytotoxic drug Decline from baseline. PSA increase ≥ 25% and ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir, and which is confirmed by a second value 3 or more weeks later No decline from baseline. PSA progression ≥ 25% and ≥ 2 ng/mL after 12 wk |
Bone metastases | The appearance of ≥ 2 new lesions, and, for the first reassessment only, a confirmatory scan performed 6 or more weeks later that shows a minimum of 2 or more additional new lesions. The date of progression is the date of the first scan showing the changes |
Soft tissue lesions | RECIST criteria, with the additional requirement that progression at first assessment is confirmed by a second scan 6 or more weeks later. For some treatments, a lesion may increase in size before it decreases |
Symptoms | Consider independently of other outcome measures. Document pain/analgesia at entry and measure repeatedly at 3- to 4-wk intervals. Ignore early changes ( ≤ 12 wk) in pain or HRQOL in the absence of compelling evidence of disease progression. |
Confirm progression of pain or HRQOL end points ≥ 3 wk later | |
Response criteria | |
PSA | Ignore early rises (prior to 12 wk) in determining PSA response Record the percent change from baseline at 12 wk, and the maximal change at any time using a waterfall plot |
Bone metastases | Record outcome as new lesions or no new lesions. If at the first scheduled reassessment there are not new lesions, continue therapy; if there are new lesions, perform a confirmatory scan 6 or more weeks later and only where new lesions are present stop therapy due to progressive disease |
Soft tissue lesions | RECIST criteria, with some caveats: |
only report changes in lymph nodes that were ≥ 2 cm in diameter at baseline; record changes in nodal and visceral soft tissue sites separately; record complete elimination of disease at any site separately; confirm favorable change with second scan; record changes using a waterfall plot | |
Symptoms | Consider independently of other outcome measures. Document pain/analgesia at entry and measure repeatedly at 3- to 4-wk intervals. Ignore early changes ( ≤ 12 wk) in pain or HRQOL in the absence of compelling evidence of disease progression Confirm response of pain or HRQOL end points ≥ 3 wk later |
Table 2 Characteristics of randomized clinical trials including overall survival as the primary end point after first-line and/or second-line medical treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Trial | Arms | No. pts | Publication year | Main conclusion | Median OS |
LSG Trial[18] | LIA | 160 | 1998 | After adjustment for baseline prognostic factors, HR for OS favored the first arm | 10.3 mo |
CPA | 161 | 10.3 mo | |||
CALGB 9182[19] | MXN + HDC | 119 | 1999 | Better PSA-RR and PFS in the first arm | 12.3 mo |
HDC | 123 | 12.6 mo | |||
HOG/FNC Trial[20] | VBL + ESM | 95 | 1999 | Better PSA-RR and PFS in the first arm | 11.9 mo |
VBL | 98 | 9.2 mo | |||
SWOG 9916[6] | DOC + ESM | 338 | 2004 | Longer OS in the first arm | 17.51 mo |
MXN + PDN | 336 | 15.6 mo | |||
TAX327[5] | MXN + PDN | 337 | 2004 | DOC-based chemotherapy is the new standard first-line treatment of mCRPC | 16.5 mo |
DOC + PDN | 335 | 18.91 mo | |||
wDOC + PDN | 334 | 17.4 mo | |||
3SPARC[21] | SPT + PDN | 635 | 2009 | Better PSA-RR in the first arm | 61.3 wk |
Placebo + PDN | 315 | 61.4 wk | |||
2TROPIC[7] | CBZ + PDN | 378 | 2010 | CBZ-based therapy is effective in mCRPC progressing to DOC | 15.11 mo |
MXN + PDN | 377 | 12.7 mo | |||
IMPACT[22] | SIP-T | 341 | 2010 | Similar results | 25.81 mo |
Placebo | 171 | 21.7 mo | |||
2COU-AA-301[8] | ABI + PDN | 797 | 2011 | ABI hormonal therapy is effective in mCRPC progressing to DOC | 14.81 mo |
Placebo + PDN | 398 | 10.9 mo | |||
ASCENT-2[23] | DOC + DN101 | 477 | 2011 | DN101 is inferior to PDN | 17.8 mo |
DOC + PDN | 476 | 20.21 mo | |||
CALGB 90401[24] | DOC + PDN + BEV | 524 | 2012 | Better PSA-RR and PFS in the first arm | 22.6 mo |
DOC + PDN + Placeb | 526 | 21.5 mo | |||
2AFFIRM[9] | ENZ | 800 | 2012 | ENZ hormonal therapy is effective in mCRPC progressing to DOC | 18.41 mo |
Placebo | 399 | 13.6 mo | |||
ENTHUSE M1C[25] | DOC + ZBT | 524 | 2013 | Similar results | 20.0 mo |
DOC + Placebo | 528 | 19.2 mo | |||
3ALSYMPCA[10] | Radium-223 | 614 | 2013 | Radium-223 effective in mCRPC with painful bone metastases | 14.91 mo |
Placebo | 307 | 11.3 mo |
Table 3 Characteristics of randomized clinical trials including time-to-event measures as the primary end point after first-line medical treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Trial | Arms | No. pts | Publication year | End point | Result(mo) |
DAPROCA 9002[26] | ESM | 61 | 1997 | TTSP | 2.2 |
Placebo | 68 | 5.0 | |||
EORTC[27] | FLT | 100 | 2001 | TTP | 2.3 |
PDN | 101 | 3.4 | |||
USOR[28] | MXN + PDN | 56 | 2002 | TTTF | 8.11 |
PDN | 63 | 4.1 | |||
Vinorelbine Trial[29] | VNR + HDC | 206 | 2004 | PFS | 3.71 |
HDC | 208 | 2.8 | |||
UCSF[30] | SIP-T | 82 | 2006 | TTP | 11.7 |
Placebo | 45 | 10.0 | |||
Atrasentan Trial[31] | ATR | 408 | 2007 | TTP | HR = 0.89 |
Placebo | 401 | ||||
PROSTVAC[32] | PROSTVAC | 82 | 2010 | PFS | 3.8 |
Placebo | 40 | 3.7 | |||
PROSTY Trial[33] | DOC three-weekly | 184 | 2013 | TTTF | 4.9 |
DOC two-weekly | 177 | 5.61 |
Table 4 Disease-progression-related events used to define secondary end points in randomized trials of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Progression event | Trial number | Ref. |
Clinical | 2 | [26,34] |
Pain | 2 | [25,35] |
Skeletal-related events | 4 | [8-10,23] |
Radiological | 7 | [6,8,9,22,24,25,36] |
Prostate-specific antigen | 6 | [8-10,24,25,31] |
Alkaline phosphatase | 2 | [10,31] |
Mixed | 9 | [7,19,20,21,28,33,37-39] |
Table 5 Characteristics of randomized clinical trials including radiologic or serological response measures as the primary end point after first line medical treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Trial | Arms | No. pts | Publication year | Response-related outcome | Response rate (%) |
CALGB 9181[40] | MA 160 mg/die | 73 | 2000 | MRR | 3% |
MA 640 mg/die | 76 | 3% | |||
INT 0159[36] | SUR 3,1 | 128 | 2002 | PSA-RR/RRR | 24%/9% |
SUR 5,3 | 124 | 28%/7% | |||
SUR 7,6 | 120 | 34%/15% | |||
ECOG 3882[34] | DOXO + DES | 74 | 2003 | MRR | 63%1 |
DOXO | 76 | 27% | |||
CALGB 9583[41] | AWD + KET + HDC | 128 | 2004 | MRR | 27%1 |
AWD | 132 | 11% | |||
Belgian Trial[38] | DOC + PDN + ESM | 71 | 2008 | PSA-RR | 41% |
DOC + PDN | 69 | 25% | |||
NHS Trial[39] | DEX + ASP + DES | 136 | 2011 | PSA-RR | 64% |
DEX + ASP | 133 | 68% |
Table 6 Characteristics of randomized clinical trials including clinical response measures as the primary end point after first line medical treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Trial | Arms | No. pts | Publication year | PROmeasure | Palliative response rate (%) |
Canadian Trial[4] | MXN + PDN | 80 | 1996 | Palliative response (moore) | 291 |
PDN | 81 | 12 | |||
SIG-1 Trial[37] | SUR + HDC | 228 | 2000 | Palliative response (BPI + analgesics) | 431 |
Placebo + HDC | 230 | 28 | |||
NCIC PR06[35] | MXN + PDN + CLD | 104 | 2003 | Palliative response (moore) | 46 |
MXN + PDN + Placebo | 105 | 39 |
Table 7 Disease-control/response related events used to define secondary end points in randomized trials of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Progression event | Trial number | Ref. |
Clinical | 1 | [27] |
Pain | 5 | [7-9,18,21] |
Radiological | 11 | [4,5,7,19,20,21,24,26,28,37,38] |
Prostate-specific antigen | 19 | [4,5,7,8,19-22,24,25,27-29,33,35, 37,38,40,41] |
Alkaline phosphatase | 1 | [10] |
Immunity | 1 | [32] |
- Citation: Colloca G, Venturino A, Governato I. End points of clinical trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review. World J Methodol 2014; 4(2): 123-132
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v4/i2/123.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.123