Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2024; 14(2): 91319
Published online Jun 20, 2024. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.91319
Published online Jun 20, 2024. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.91319
Drug class and mechanism | Agent | Trial design | Biochemical response | Histological response | Comments |
PPARα (Fatty acid oxidation and Anti-inflammatory)[21,22] | Fenofibrate | 16 patients, 48 wk vs placebo | Significant reduction in triglyceride and liver enzymes | Decreased ballooning, grade steatosis, inflammation/fibrosis no change | Limited efficacy |
Clofibrate | 40 patients 1 yr vs UDCA | Reduced ALT | No change | ||
PPAR β/δ (glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity)[23,24] | GW501516 | 6 patients, 2 wk vs placebo | Reduced TG and LDL | No data | Abandoned due to cancer risk in preclinical studies |
MBX-8025 | 181 overweight patients, 2 wk vs placebo | Favorable lipid profile and decreased liver enzymes | No data | Need more data | |
PPARγ (adipogenesis, insulin sensitization, fatty acid oxidation)[25-27] | Rosiglitazone | 63 patients, 52 wk vs placebo | Normalized transaminase levels (38% vs 7%, P = 0.005) | Improved steatosis (47% vs 16%; P = 0.014), although only half of the patients responded, no change of other histologic parameters | Weight gain and painful swollen legs in rosiglitazone arm |
Pioglitazone | RCT, 61 patients, 12 months placebo or pioglitazone had paired biopsies | Improvement of ALT and GGT | Hepatocellular injury (P = 0.005), Mallory–Denk bodies (P = 0.004), and fibrosis (P = 0.05) were reduced in patients treated with pioglitazone | Weight gain with pioglitazone | |
RCT, 259 patients pioglitazone vs vitamin E vs placebo 96 wk | Improvement of transaminases in the vitamin E and pioglitazone arm | Improvement in NASH as compared with placebo (pioglitazone P = 0.04), significant reductions in steatosis, lobular inflammation and fibrosis in pioglitazone arm | Weight gain in pioglitazone group |
Drug class and mechanism | Agent | Trial design | Biochemical response | Histological response | Comments |
PPAR α/δ agonist[33] | Elafibranor | 276 patients, Elafibranor 80 mg vs 120 mg vs placebo, 52 wk, GOLDEN trial | Liver enzymes, lipids, glucose profiles, and markers of systemic inflammation were significantly reduced in the elafibranor 120-mg group | Elafibranor 120 mg was superior to the placebo, with NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis in 19% versus 12% in the placebo group (P = 0.045), based on a post hoc analysis for the modified definition | No change in primary outcome in intention to treat analysis |
1070 patients, Elafibranor 120 mg vs placebo, 72 wk, RESOLVE IT trial | Improvement in TG, ALT, and GGT | 138 (19.2%) patients in the Ela group and 52 (14.7%) patients in the placebo group achieved resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis (P = 0.066) | Despite the absence of safety signals, the RESOLVE-IT trial was discontinued due to the limited effect of Ela on surrogate efficacy endpoints | ||
PPAR α/γ agonist[34-38] | Tesaglitazar, Muraglitazar, Aleglitazar | Favorable lipid profile with muraglitazar | No change | Trials terminated early due to nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity and gastrointestinal hemorrhage respectively | |
Saroglitazar | 106 patients, 16 wk vs placebo | Improvement in ALT and lipid profile | No data | DCGI approved for NAFLD in India | |
85 patients, 12 wk vs placebo | Improvement in ALT and TG | Significant reduction in liver fibrosis (fibroscan) | |||
Pan PPAR agonists[39,40] | Bezafibrate | Improve HbA1c and atherogenic dyslipidemia in mice | No data | Mostly animal data. Human studies are ongoing | |
Lanifibranor | Improve insulin sensitivity in mice | Improve steatosis and fibrosis in liver tissue in mice |
Ref. | Agent | Comparator | Participants | Duration | Outcomes |
Newsome et al[50], 2021 | Semaglutide 0.1, 0.2 or 0.4 mg s/c once daily | Placebo | NASH with F1, F2, or F3 fibrosis stage | 72 wk | NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis: 40% (0.1 mg), 36% (0.2 mg), 59% (0.4 mg), 33% (placebo); Improvement in fibrosis (P < 0.001 for 0.4 mg vs placebo); 43% (0.4 mg), 33% (placebo) (P = 0.48); Weight loss: 13% (0.4 mg), 1% placebo |
Loomba et al[51], 2023 | Semaglutide 2.4 mg s/c | Placebo (1: 2) | NASH with compensated cirrhosis | 48 wk | Improvement in liver fibrosis by ≥ 1 stage without worsening NASH: 11% Semaglutide, 29% placebo (P = 0.087); Resolution of NASH at 48 wk: 34% semaglutide, 21% placebo (P = 0.29); No new safety concerns |
Romero-Gomez et al[52], 2023 | Efinopegdutide 10 mg s/c once weekly | Semaglutide 1 mg s/c once weekly | NAFLD with liver fat content (LFC) ≥ 10% | 24 wk | Relative reduction in LFC from baseline higher with efinopegdutide (72.7%) than semaglutide (42.3%); Similar reduction in body weight |
Alkhouri et al[53], 2022 | Semaglutide 2.4 mg s/c + cilofexor once daily (30 or 100 mg)+ fircosostat (20 mg) | Semaglutide alone Semaglutide+cilofexor/fircosostat | NASH (MRI-PDFF > 10%, elastography ≥ 7 kPa | 24 wk | Combination well tolerated; Greater reduction in liver fat with combination groups vs semaglutide (10%-11% vs 8.6%); Similar weight loss in all the groups |
Flint et al[54], 2021 | Semaglutide 0.4 mg s/c once daily | Placebo | NAFLD, steatosis ≥ 10% (MRI-PDFF), MRE: 2.5-4.63 kPa | 48 wk | ≥ 30% reduction in liver steatosis at 24, 48 and 72 wk (64.7%, 76.5%, 73.5%) significantly higher than placebo; Change in liver stiffness in NAFLD not significantly different compared to placebo; Improvement in liver enzymes, body weight and HbA1c |
Armstrong et al[55], 2016 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d s/c | Placebo | Biopsy proven NASH | 48 wk | 39% had resolution of NASH (vs 9% placebo); Progression of fibrosis: 9% Liraglutide, 36% placebo |
Khoo et al[56], 2017 | Liraglutide 3.0 mg/d | Diet and moderate exercise | Obesity and NAFLD (Liver fat content > 5% on MRI) | 26 wk | Similar reduction in weight, liver fat, liver enzymes in both the groups without any significant difference between the two |
Yan et al[57], 2019 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d | Insulin glargine or sitagliptin | T2D and NAFLD | 26 wk | Liraglutide and sitagliptin along with metformin reduced body weight, liver fat content, visceral adipose tissue in addition to glycemic control in contrast to Insulin, subcutaneous fat also decreased in liraglutide arm |
Bizino et al[58], 2020 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d | Placebo | T2D and NAFLD | 26 wk | Liraglutide reduced significantly more body weight and subcutaneous fat but not visceral fat |
Guo et al[59], 2020 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d | Insulin glargine or placebo | T2D and NAFLD | 26 wk | Liraglutide plus 2 gm metformin for 26 wk significantly reduced liver, subcutaneous and visceral fat |
Zhang et al[60], 2020 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d | Pioglitazone | T2D and NAFLD | 24 wk | Liraglutide reduced liver fat significantly compare to pioglitazone which could be attributed to weight loss |
Liu et al[61], 2020 | Exenatide 1.8 mg/d | Insulin glargine | T2D and NAFLD | 24 wk | Both reduced liver fat but exenatide led to higher reduction in body weight, visceral fat, liver enzymes |
Miyake et al[62], 2022 (Trial Registration: jRCTs061210009) | Semaglutide 0.5 mg/wk + Luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/d | Semaglutide 0.5 mg/wk | T2D and NASH | 52 wk | Ongoing study |
Gastaldelli et al[63], 2022 | Dual GIP/GLP-1R agonist: tirzepatide10 mg or 15 mg/wk | Insulin degludec | T2D and NAFLD | 52 wk | Significant decrease in liver fat content, visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to insulin degludec |
Kuchay et al[64], 2020 | Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1r) agonist (GLP-1 RA) | Usual care | T2D and NAFLD | 24 wk | Dulaglutide significantly reduces liver fat comma gamma glutamyl transpeptidase |
- Citation: Pramanik S, Pal P, Ray S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: Emerging evidence of benefit of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors agonists and incretin-based therapies. World J Methodol 2024; 14(2): 91319
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v14/i2/91319.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.91319