Latt NL, Niazi M, Pyrsopoulos NT. Liver transplant allocation policies and outcomes in United States: A comprehensive review. World J Methodol 2022; 12(1): 32-42 [PMID: 35117980 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i1.32]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Nikolaos T Pyrsopoulos, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, 185 S. Orange Avenue MSB H Rm–536, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, United States. pyrsopni@njms.rutgers.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Methodol. Jan 20, 2022; 12(1): 32-42 Published online Jan 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i1.32
Table 1 Model for end-stage liver disease exception points granted
Year of policy implementation
MELD exception points granted
T2 lesion (A single nodule with diameter ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 5 cm or 2-3 lesions each between 1-3 cm)
T1 lesion (A single nodule ≥ 1 cm and < 2 cm)
February 2002
29 points
24 points
February 2003
24 points
20 points
April 2004
24 points
No exception points
March 2005
22 points
No exception points
October 2015
Natural MELD score at the time of listing
No exception points
28 points after 6 mo with maximum 34 exception points
May 2019
MMaT-3
No exception points
Table 2 Lesions eligible for downstaging protocols
Number of lesions
Size
Description
1
> 5 cm and ≤ 8 cm
2-3
At least one lesion > 3 cm and all ≤ 5 cm
Total diameter of all lesions ≤ 8 cm
4-5
Each < 3 cm
Total diameter of all lesions ≤ 8 cm
Table 3 Organ procurement and transplantation network imaging classification for class 5 lesions in patients with cirrhosis
OPTN class
Description
Comments
0
Incomplete are technically in adequate study
No MELD exception points
5A
Lesion size ≥ 1 cm and ≤ 2 cm
Increased contrast enhancement in the late hepatic arterial phase along with either: (1) Wash out during late contrast phases and peripheral rim enhancement (capsule or pseudocapsule); and (2) Biopsy consistent with HCC
5A-g
Lesion size ≥ 1 cm and ≤ 2 cm
Increased contrast enhancement in the late hepatic arterial phase along with growth ≥ 50% documented on serial CT or MR obtained ≤ 6 mo apart
5B
Lesion size ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 5 cm
Increased contrast enhancement in the late hepatic arterial phase along with either: (1) Wash out during late contrast phases; (2) Peripheral rim enhancement (capsule or pseudocapsule); (3) Growth ≥ 50% documented on serial CT or MR obtained ≤ 6 mo apart in the absence of ablative therapy; and (4) Biopsy consistent with HCC
5T
Prior local regional therapy for HCC
Any residual lesion or perfusion defect at the site of prior class 5A, 5A-g, 5B lesion
Table 4 Conditions eligible for non-hepatocellular carcinoma standard model for end-stage liver disease-exceptions
Condition
Requirements for exception points
MELD score assigned
CCA
Un-resectable hilar CCA with biopsy/cytology consistent with malignancy or CA19-9 > 100 U/mL or aneuploidy
MMaT-3
Center must have written protocol regarding selection of criteria, neoadjuvant therapy, operative staging for metastatic disease
Imaging to exclude metastatic disease
HPS
Evidence of portal hypertension without any evidence of underlying significant pulmonary disease
MMaT-3
PaO2 < 60 mmHg on room air
ECHO or lung scan confirming intra-pulmonary shunt
POPH
Evidence of portal hypertension along with MPAP > 35 mmHg and PVR > 3 woods unit
MMaT-3
MPAP < 35 mmHg and PVR < 5.1 woods unit post treatment of pulmonary hypertension
FAP
Biopsy proven amyloid along with TTR gene mutation and able to walk independently
MMaT-3
Must be on heart transplant wait list or EF > 40% on ECHO within 30 d
Cystic fibrosis
Genetic analysis confirmation needed
MMaT-3
FEV1 below 40% of predicted FEV1 with 30 d prior to initial request
HAT
HAT within 2 wk of OLT
40
Primary hyperoxaluria
AGT deficiency proven on liver biopsy/genetic analysis
MMaT
On kidney transplant list with eGFR ≤ 25 mL/min on two instances 42 d apart
Citation: Latt NL, Niazi M, Pyrsopoulos NT. Liver transplant allocation policies and outcomes in United States: A comprehensive review. World J Methodol 2022; 12(1): 32-42