Minireviews
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Methodol. Jul 20, 2021; 11(4): 187-198
Published online Jul 20, 2021. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.187
Table 1 Characteristics and main findings of included studies
Ref. Population Sample size Intervention Duration of follow-up Main findings Owan et al [10 ], 2008 ADHF with renal dysfunction 72 Standard therapy vs standard therapy plus nesiritide (bolus of 0.2 mcg/kg followed by 0.01 mcg/kg per min) 72 h Nesiritide produced greater reduction in blood pressure and preserved renal function Bart et al [11 ], 2012 ADHF with worsened renal function 188 Ultrafiltration therapy vs stepped pharmacologic therapy (intravenous diuretics) 96 h Stepped pharmacologic-therapy with intravenous diuretics was superior to ultrafiltration Fedele et al [12 ], 2014 ADHF and renal impairment 21 Levosimendan (loading dose 6 μg/kg + 0.1 μg/kg per min) for 24 h vs placebo 72 h Levosimendan improves the laboratory markers of renal function and renal hemodynamic parameters Chen et al [13 ], 2013 AHF and renal dysfunction 360 Low dose dopamine (2 μg/kg per min for 72 h) vs low dose nesiritide (0.005 μg/kg per min for 72 h) vs placebo 72 h Neither low dose dopamine nor low dose nesiritide improved renal function when added to diuretic therapy Inomata et al [14 ], 2017 HF with diuretic resistance and renal impairment 81 Additive tolvaptan (≤ 15 mg/d) vs increased furosemide (≤ 40 mg/d) 7 d Additive tolvaptan increased urine volume compared with patients receiving an increased dose of furosemide Lannemyr et al [15 ], 2018 Chronic HF and impaired renal function 32 Levosimendan (loading dose 12 μg/kg + 0.1 μg/kg per min) vs dobutamine (7.5 μg/kg per min) for 75 min 60 mo and 75 mo after treatment Levosimendan is the preferred inotropic agent compared to dobutamine
Table 2 Changes in clinical parameters of the included studies
Intervention Clinical parameters evaluated Ref. Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) Cystatin C (mg/L) Weight loss (kg) Cumulative urine volume (mL) Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Mean changes Nesiritide Owan et al [10 ], 2008 1.85 ± 0.71 0.04 ± 0.44 44.8 ± 23.3 -1.3 ± 12.8 NA NA -2.75 ± 3.27 NA Owan et al [10 ], 2008 (placebo) 1.65 ± 0.42 0.09 ± 0.25 38.3 ± 16.6 2.4 ± 6.8 NA NA -4.25 ± 3.42 NA Chen et al [13 ], 2013 1.65 0.02 NA NA 1.66 0.07 NA 8574 Chen et al [13 ], 2013 (placebo) 1.70 0.02 NA NA 1.86 0.11 NA 8296
Table 3 Changes in clinical parameters of the included studies
Intervention Clinical parameters evaluated Ref. Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) Cystatin C (mg/L) Weight loss (kg) Urine output (mL/d) Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Furosemide Inomata et al [14 ], 2017 1.6 0.20 ± 0.27 NA NA NA NA 61 -2.1 ± 2.6 1251 ± 540 79 ± 341
Table 4 Changes in clinical parameters of the included studies
Intervention Clinical parameters evaluated Ref. Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) Cystatin C (mg/L) GFR (mL/min) Urine output (mL/d) Baseline 72 h Baseline 72 h Baseline 72 h Baseline 72 h Baseline 72 h Levosimendan Fedele et al [12 ], 2014 1.76 ± 0.37 1.51 ± 0.5 45.08 ± 22.19 33.14 ± 16.63 2577.5 ± 700.6 2083 ± 731.4 38.71 ± 7.94 53.34 ± 14.93 1766.4 ± 514.2 2663.5 ± 721.2 Fedele et al [12 ], 2014 (placebo) 1.6 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.2 44.4 ± 13.1 47 ± 12.8 2498.5 ± 262 2470 ± 409.9 43.33 ± 7.99 40.24 ± 6.58 1571.4 ± 125.3 1778.51 ± 798.1 Ref. Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) RBF (mL/min) GFR (mL/min) FF Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Inomata et al [14 ], 2017 NA NA NA NA 426 ± 197 518 ± 276 36.5 ± 18.3 44.5 ± 19.0 0.146 ± 0.080 0.143 ± 0.069
Table 5 Changes in clinical parameters of the included studies
Intervention Clinical parameters evaluated Ref. Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) Cystatin C (mg/L) Weight loss (kg) Cumulative urine volume (mL) Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Dopamine/dobutamine Chen et al [13 ], 2013 (dopamine) 1.59 0.00 NA NA 1.71 0.12 NA NA 8524 Chen et al [13 ], 2013 (placebo) 1.63 0.02 NA NA 1.66 0.11 NA NA 8296 Ref. Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) RBF (mL/min) GFR (mL/min) FF Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Baseline Treatment Lannemyr et al [15 ], 2018 (dobutamine) NA NA NA NA 397 ± 121 499 ± 154 47.1 ± 14.5 47.3 ± 16.9 0.193 ± 0.070 0.161 ± 0.075
Table 6 Changes in clinical parameters of the included studies
Intervention Clinical parameters evaluated Study Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) Cystatin C (mg/L) Weight loss (kg) Urine output (mL/d) Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Tolvaptan Inomata et al [14 ], 2017 1.5 0.06 ± 0.32 NA NA NA NA 62 -2.1 ± 1.8 1306 ± 494 459 ± 514
Table 7 Changes in clinical parameters of the included studies
Intervention Clinical parameters evaluated Study Creatinine (mg/dL) Change in BUN (mg/dL) GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2 ) Weight loss (Ib) Urine output (mL/d) Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Baseline Mean changes Ultrafiltration Bart et al [11 ], 2012 2.09 -0.04 ± 0.53 50.5 5.68 ± 18.29 1.67 ± 10.94 234 12.1 ± 11.3 NA NA Bart et al [11 ], 2012 (pharmaco-logic therapy) 1.90 +0.23 ± 0.70 48.7 12.54 ± 24.81 0.93 ± 14.60 207 12.6 ± 8.5 NA NA