Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Nephrol. Sep 6, 2016; 5(5): 437-447
Published online Sep 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i5.437
Published online Sep 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i5.437
Table 1 Initial dose of vitamin D analogue (calcitriol) to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism due to chronic kidney disease
PTH level | Vitamin D analogue dose (calcitriol) |
PTH 200-499 pg/mL | 0.25 mcg qd once a day |
PTH 500-999 pg/mL | 0.50 mcg qd or 1 mcg qd once a day/3 times a week |
PTH > 1000 pg/mL | 2.0 mcg qd once a day/3 times a week |
Table 2 Mantainance dose of vitamin D analogue (calcitriol) to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism due to chronic kidney disease in initially unresponsive patients
PTH level | Vitamin D analogue dose (calcitriol) |
PTH 200-299 pg/mL | 0.25 mcg qd once a day |
PTH 300-399 pg/mL | 0.50 mcg qd or 0.75 mcg qd once a day, 3 times a week |
PTH 400-999 pg/mL | 1.0 mcg qd once a day 3 times a week |
PTH > 1000 pg/mL | 2.0 mcg oral or IV 3 times a week |
Table 3 Clinical and demographical characteristics of the studied population
Table 4 Comparison of laboratory results of patients without and with nodule
Surgery | PTH | Ca | P | Ca × P | AP | BAP |
No nodule (n = 32) | 796.2 ± 229.7 | 8.6 ± 0.7 | 4.8 ± 1.2 | 41.5 ± 12.4 | 246.7 ± 128.7 | 100.8 ± 69.6 |
With nodule (n = 53) | 1106.4 ± 462.5 | 9.0 ± 0.6 | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 53.1 ± 10.3 | 283 ± 254.4 | 106.4 ± 91.9 |
P | < 0.001 | 0.006 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.387 | 0.783 |
Table 5 Observed outcomes until end of follow-up in January 2009 (n = 85)
Nodule in US | P | RR (95%CI) | ||
No (n = 32) | Yes (n = 53) | |||
Deceased | ||||
No | 29 (90.6%) | 41 (77.4%) | 0.1202 | 1.00 |
Yes | 3 (9.4%) | 12 (22.6%) | 2.83 (0.73; 10.93) | |
Transplant | ||||
No | 28 (87.5%) | 48 (90.6%) | 0.7232 | 1.37 (0.54; 5.53) |
Yes | 4 (12.5%) | 5 (9.4%) | 1.00 | |
Cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular event4 | ||||
No | 25 (78.1%) | 43 (81.1%) | 0.7371 | 1.20 (0.41; 3.56) |
Yes | 7 (21.9%) | 10 (18.9%) | 1.00 | |
Vascular calcification5 | ||||
No | 23 (71.9%) | 33 (62.3%) | 0.6331 | 1.00 |
Yes | 7 (21.9%) | 13 (24.5%) | 1.29 (0.40; 4.28) | |
No register | 2 (6.3%) | 7 (13.2%) | ||
Bone disease6 | ||||
No | 18 (56.3%) | 34 (64.2%) | 0.2021 | 1.89 (0.63; 5.56) |
Yes | 12 (37.5%) | 12 (22.6%) | 1.00 | |
No register | 2 (6.3%) | 7 (13.2%) | ||
Surgery | ||||
No | 32 (100%) | 37 (69.8%) | < 0.001 | 3 |
Yes | 0 (0%) | 16 (30.2%) |
Table 6 Comparison of parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphorus, calcium × phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase between October 2008 and January 2009 for each group (n = 60)
Nodules | PTH | Ca | P | Ca × P | AP | |
Without nodules (n = 25) | Mean | 833.2 | 8.70 | 4.80 | 41.4 | 249.6 |
SD | 602.2 | 0.7 | 1.40 | 12.50 | 255.6 | |
With nodules (n = 35) | Mean | 1031.2 | 8.70 | 5.10 | 44.60 | 396.2 |
SD | 775.1 | 0.9 | 1.50 | 13.60 | 535.8 | |
P1 | 0.271 | 0.974 | 0.341 | 0.350 | 0.210 |
Table 7 Comparison between patients submitted or not to parathyroidectomy
Surgery | PTH | Ca | P | Ca × P | AP | BAP |
No (n = 37) | 1030.8 ± 391.8 | 9.0 ± 0.6 | 6.0 ± 1.0 | 53.7 ± 10.9 | 212.6 ± 121.5 | 82.7 ± 55.3 |
Yes (n = 16) | 1281.1 ± 571.4 | 9.1 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 1.0 | 51.6 ± 9.0 | 445.9 ± 385.1 | 160.5 ± 132 |
P1 | 0. 125 | 0. 605 | 0. 354 | 0. 497 | 0. 030 | 0. 050 |
Table 8 Comparison of results of parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphorus, calcium × phosphorus product, alkaline phosphatase levels from October 2008 to January 2009, patients with nodules, with and without parathyroidectomy (n = 35)
Surgery | PTH | Ca | P | Ca × P | AP | |
No (n = 20) | Mean | 992.4 | 8.90 | 5.60 | 49.90 | 214.9 |
SD | 639.5 | 0.80 | 1.20 | 11.70 | 251.7 | |
Yes (n = 15) | Mean | 1082.9 | 8.40 | 4.50 | 37.60 | 638 |
SD | 948.2 | 1.10 | 1.60 | 13.10 | 708.3 | |
P1 | 0.752 | 0.126 | 0.030 | 0.006 | 0.041 |
Table 9 Comparison of laboratory results of patients with nodules submitted to parathyroidectomy (n = 15) in 2 different periods: 2005/2006 and 2008/2009
- Citation: Ribeiro C, Penido MGMG, Guimarães MMM, Tavares MS, Souza BDN, Leite AF, de Deus LMC, Machado LJC. Parathyroid ultrasonography and bone metabolic profile of patients on dialysis with hyperparathyroidism. World J Nephrol 2016; 5(5): 437-447
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v5/i5/437.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v5.i5.437