Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Nephrol. May 6, 2015; 4(2): 230-234
Published online May 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.230
Published online May 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.230
Table 1 Stone criteria for shock wave lithotripsy
| Sub-optimal features suggesting alternate therapy |
| Stone size > 2 cm |
| Multiple stones |
| Lower pole stone |
| Hounsfield unit > 1000 |
| History of cystine, calcium oxalate monohydrate, matrix stones |
Table 2 Patient criteria for shock wave lithotripsy
| Sub-optimal features suggesting alternate therapy |
| Obesity - skin to stone distance > 10 cm |
| Pelvic kidney |
| Horseshoe kidney |
| Calyceal diverticulum |
Table 3 Absolute contraindications to shock wave lithotripsy
| Anticoagulation |
| Bleeding diathesis |
| Pregnancy |
| Severe skeletal malformations |
| Distal obstruction |
| Infection associated with obstruction |
Table 4 Technical factors that optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome
| General anesthesia |
| Optimal coupling |
| Low shock wave rate (60 shocks per minute) |
| Wider focal zone |
| Active intraoperative monitoring |
- Citation: Semins MJ, Matlaga BR. Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: Patient selection and treatment parameters. World J Nephrol 2015; 4(2): 230-234
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v4/i2/230.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.230
