BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Nephrol. May 6, 2015; 4(2): 230-234
Published online May 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.230
Table 1 Stone criteria for shock wave lithotripsy
Sub-optimal features suggesting alternate therapy
Stone size > 2 cm
Multiple stones
Lower pole stone
Hounsfield unit > 1000
History of cystine, calcium oxalate monohydrate, matrix stones
Table 2 Patient criteria for shock wave lithotripsy
Sub-optimal features suggesting alternate therapy
Obesity - skin to stone distance > 10 cm
Pelvic kidney
Horseshoe kidney
Calyceal diverticulum
Table 3 Absolute contraindications to shock wave lithotripsy
Anticoagulation
Bleeding diathesis
Pregnancy
Severe skeletal malformations
Distal obstruction
Infection associated with obstruction
Table 4 Technical factors that optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome
General anesthesia
Optimal coupling
Low shock wave rate (60 shocks per minute)
Wider focal zone
Active intraoperative monitoring


Write to the Help Desk