Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Nephrol. Nov 6, 2013; 2(4): 129-135
Published online Nov 6, 2013. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v2.i4.129
Published online Nov 6, 2013. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v2.i4.129
Table 1 Comparing demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with combined dose Aliskerin and Angiotensin receptor blockers, Aliskerin alone and high dose Angiotensin receptor blockers
Combined Aliskerin and ARB | Aliskerin | High dose ARB | 1P value | |
n= 49 | n= 46 | n= 48 | ||
Sex (F : M) | 16:33 | 22:24 | 23:25 | NS |
Age at biopsy (yr) | 58 ± 12 | 57 ± 12 | 60 ± 11 | NS |
Duration of Trial (mo) | 37 ± 1 | 36 ± 1 | 36 ± 1 | NS |
Hypertension (Yes : No) | 16:15 | 15:31 | 17:31 | NS |
Serum Creatinine (µmol/L) | ||||
Baseline | 142 ± 39 | 142 ± 40 | 139 ± 32 | NS |
Year 3 | 159 ± 53 (P = 0.001) | 161 ± 54 (P < 0.001) | 150 ± 47 (P = 0.015) | NS |
eGFR (mL/min) | ||||
Baseline | 49 ± 19 | 48 ± 14 | 48 ± 14 | NS |
Year 3 | 44 ± 18 (P < 0.001) | 42 ± 15 (P < 0.001) | 45 ± 15 (P = 0.002) | NS |
Decrease in eGFR (mL/min per year) | 1.8 ± 2.5 | 2.0 ± 3.0 | 1.0 ± 2.1 | P = 0.119 |
Urinary Protein (gm/d) | ||||
Baseline | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.8 ± 0.9 | 0.6 ± 0.7 | NS |
Year 3 | 0.5 ± 0.8 (P = 0.002) | 0.6 ± 0.7 (P = 0.043) | 0.3 ± 0.3 (P < 0.001) | P = 0.007 |
Blood Pressure (mmHg) | ||||
Systolic before | 132 ± 12 | 135 ± 10 | 132 ± 12 | NS |
Systolic after | 127 ± 10 (P < 0.001) | 130 ± 9 (P < 0.001) | 128 ± 11 (P < 0.001) | NS |
Diastolic before | 84 ± 7 | 85 ± 6 | 84 ± 7 | NS |
Diastolic after | 82 ± 5 P = 0.040 | 83 ± 6 P = 0.084 | 83 ± 6 P = 0.361 | NS |
Distribution of CKD at baseline | ||||
CKD 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.465 |
CKD 2 | 8 | 5 | 4 | |
CKD 3 | 40 | 41 | 44 | |
Distribution of CKD at year 3 | 0.606 | |||
CKD 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
CKD 2 | 8 | 7 | 5 | |
CKD 3 | 28 | 26 | 34 | |
CKD 4 | 12 | 13 | 9 | |
Non-ESRF | 49 | 46 | 48 | NS |
ESRF | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Improvement in eGFR | ||||
Yes | 12 | 15 | 15 | 0.645 |
No | 37 | 31 | 33 |
Table 2 Test of within-subject contrast (change from baseline and change from previous year) for estimated glomerular filtration rate and total urinary protein
Variable | Measure | Year | F | P value | |
Change from baseline | Year1 treatment | eGFR | year 1 vs baseline1 | 0.63 | 0.530 |
year 2 vs baseline | 0.46 | 0.632 | |||
year 3 vs baseline | 2.16 | 0.119 | |||
TUP | year 1 vs baseline | 6.00 | 0.003 | ||
year 2 vs baseline | 4.16 | 0.018 | |||
year 3 vs baseline | 0.90 | 0.409 | |||
Change from previous year | Year1 treatment | eGFR | year 1 vs baseline1 | 0.63 | 0.536 |
year 2 vs year 1 | 0.03 | 0.967 | |||
year 3 vs year 2 | 2.93 | 0.057 | |||
TUP | year 1 vs baseline | 6.01 | 0.003 | ||
year 2 vs year 1 | 0.16 | 0.851 | |||
year 3 vs year 2 | 3.11 | 0.048 |
- Citation: Woo KT, Choong HL, Wong KS, Tan HK, Foo M, Stephanie FC, Lee EJ, Anantharaman V, Lee GS, Chan CM. A retrospective Aliskiren and Losartan study in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. World J Nephrol 2013; 2(4): 129-135
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v2/i4/129.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v2.i4.129