Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Jun 25, 2026; 15(2): 118360
Published online Jun 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.118360
Published online Jun 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.118360
Table 1 General characteristics of the patients, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (interquartile rage)
| Variable | n = 54 |
| Sex (male) | 32 (59.3) |
| Age (years) | 57.6 ± 13.1 |
| Hemodialysis vintage (months) | 21.5 (5.0-62.2) |
| Diabetic | 21 (38.9) |
| Vascular access | |
| Arteriovenous fistula | 37 (68.6) |
| Double-lumen catheter | 17 (31.5) |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 8.91 ± 3.56 |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 111.5 (97.0-122.7) |
| C-reactive protein (mg/dL) | 0.48 (0.17-1.21) |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.90 ± 0.55 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.25 ± 5.75 |
| Interdialytic weight gain (kg) | 1.94 ± 0.95 |
| Urea clearance index | 1.30 ± 0.26 |
Table 2 Hydration parameters before and after the hemodialysis session (n = 54), median (interquartile rage)/ mean ± SD
| Parameters | Before dialysis | After dialysis | P value |
| SBP (mmHg) | 137 (129-161) | 143 (124-158) | 1.000 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76 (67-88) | 78 (70-98) | 0.608 |
| Total body water (L) | 36.94 ± 7.02 | 33.27 ± 6.42 | < 0.001 |
| Intracellular water (L) | 19.06 ± 4.15 | 18.12 ± 3.92 | < 0.001 |
| Intracellular water (%) | 51.50 ± 4.48 | 53.87 ± 5.41 | < 0.001 |
| Extracellular water (L) | 17.89 ± 3.62 | 15.15 ± 3.26 | < 0.001 |
| Extracellular water (%) | 48.49 ± 4.48 | 45.56 ± 4.68 | < 0.001 |
| NT pro-BNP (ng/mL) | 0.677 (0.182-2.422) | 0.549 (0.138-2.322) | 0.002 |
| Overhydration (L) | -0.36 ± 2.93 | -3.43 ± 2.57 | < 0.001 |
| Overhydration/extracellular water (%) | -3.95 ± 16.80 | -25.34 ± 19.88 | < 0.001 |
| Extracellular water/weight (%) | 24.81 ± 3.36 | 21.55 ± 2.99 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Correlations of hydration assessment indices with blood pressure and body water parameters before dialysis session (n = 54)
| Pre-dialysis parameter | OH | OH/ECW | ECW/body weight | |
| SBP (mmHg) | r | 0.3741 | 0.3521 | 0.217 |
| P value | 0.0051 | 0.0091 | 0.115 | |
| DBP (mmHg) | r | 0.3161 | 0.2973 | 0.132 |
| P value | 0.0201 | 0.0293 | 0.342 | |
| IDWG (kg) | r | 0.4821 | 0.5052 | 0.3541 |
| P value | < 0.0011 | < 0.0012 | 0.0091 | |
| TBW (L) | r | 0.5172 | 0.5532 | 0.089 |
| P value | < 0.0012 | < 0.0012 | 0.524 | |
| ICW (L) | r | 0.3951 | 0.4321 | -0.104 |
| P value | 0.0031 | < 0.0011 | 0.453 | |
| ICW (%) | r | -0.115 | -0.106 | -0.429 |
| P value | 0.409 | 0.446 | 0.001 | |
| ECW (L) | r | 0.5402 | 0.5642 | 0.2893 |
| P value | < 0.0012 | < 0.0012 | 0.0343 | |
| ECW (%) | r | 0.113 | 0.104 | 0.4291 |
| P value | 0.414 | 0.452 | 0.0011 | |
| NT pro BNP (ng/mL) | r | 0.181 | 0.180 | 0.257 |
| P value | 0.228 | 0.232 | 0.084 | |
Table 4 Correlations of hydration assessment indices with blood pressure and body water parameters after dialysis session (n = 54)
| Post-dialysis parameter | OH | OH/ECW | ECW/body weight | |
| SBP (mmHg) | r | 0.5202 | 0.4951 | 0.252 |
| P value | < 0.0012 | < 0.0011 | 0.066 | |
| DBP (mmHg) | r | 0.3931 | 0.3431 | 0.055 |
| P value | 0.0031 | 0.0111 | 0.695 | |
| IDWG (kg) | r | 0.3391 | 0.3671 | 0.184 |
| P value | 0.0121 | 0.0061 | 0.183 | |
| TBW (L) | r | 0.3641 | 0.5482 | 0.062 |
| P value | 0.0071 | < 0.0012 | 0.657 | |
| ICW (L) | r | 0.235 | 0.3721 | -0.172 |
| P value | 0.087 | 0.0061 | 0.214 | |
| ICW (%) | r | -0.122 | -0.162 | -0.3681 |
| P value | 0.378 | 0.241 | 0.0061 | |
| ECW (L) | r | 0.4351 | 0.6322 | 0.3291 |
| P value | 0.0011 | < 0.0012 | 0.0151 | |
| ECW (%) | r | 0.216 | 0.2903 | 0.5592 |
| P value | 0.117 | 0.0343 | < 0.0012 | |
| NT pro BNP (ng/mL) | r | 0.3101 | 0.269 | 0.4271 |
| P value | 0.0361 | 0.070 | 0.0031 | |
- Citation: Borges GLS, Mendes LR, Trombim IC, Goes CR, Vogt BP. Bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing hydration status in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(2): 118360
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v15/i2/118360.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.118360