Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Nephrol. Jun 25, 2025; 14(2): 100092
Published online Jun 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.100092
Published online Jun 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.100092
Table 1 Comparison of patient demographic profile between radial artery deviation and reimplantation and classical group, n (%)
Variable | RADAR (n = 47) | Classical (n = 47) | P value |
Average age (year), mean ± SD | 44.36 ± 15.85317 | 47.42 ± 15.85317 | 0.856 |
Sex | |||
Male | 37 (78.7) | 33 (70.2) | 0.344 |
Female | 10 (21.3) | 14 (29.8) | - |
Comorbidities | |||
HTN | 44 (93.6) | 42 (89.36) | 0.24 |
DM | 8 (17.02) | 12 (25.53) | 0.17 |
CAD | 4 (8.51) | 2 (4.25) | 0.20 |
Others | 1 (2.12) | 2 (4.25) | 0.28 |
Diameter (mm), mean ± SD | |||
Artery | 2.18 ± 0.20358 | 2.18 ± 0.22824 | 0.159 |
Vein | 2.29 ± 0.24181 | 2.36 ± 0.38086 | 0.200 |
CKD diagnosis (months), mean ± SD | 2.7553 ± 2.16412 | 3.13 ± 2.795 | 0.472 |
HD duration (months), mean ± SD | 1.64 ± 0.814 | 1.91 ± 1.943 | 0.390 |
BMI, mean ± SD | 23.4043 ± 1.34342 | 22.8745 ± 1.77415 | 0.472 |
Table 2 Independent t test between procedure and continuous variables, mean ± SD
Variable | Classical | RADAR | P value |
Duration of CKD (months) | 3.13 ± 2.795 | 2.76 ± 2.164 | 0.472 |
Duration of hemodialysis (months) | 1.91 ± 1.943 | 1.65 ± .814 | 0.389 |
Radial artery diameter (mm) | 2.1630 ± 2.0616 | 2.1872 ± 1.4237 | 0.509 |
Cephalic vein diameter (mm) | 2.2277 ± 3.6576 | 2.3021 ± 2.3636 | 0.244 |
Time for maturation (in days) | 37.78 ± 5.683 | 28.33 ± 5.437 | 0.001 |
Table 3 Univariate regression analysis of outcomes with respect to procedure, n (%)
Variable | n | Unadjusted OR | 95%CI | P value |
Success | ||||
RADAR (Ref) | 45 (95.74) | - | - | - |
Classical | 36 (76.59) | 0.145 | 0.030-0.699 | 0.016 |
Complication | ||||
RADAR (Ref) | 6 (12.8) | - | - | - |
Classical | 14 (29.8) | 2.899 | 1.004-8.372 | 0.049 |
Maturation time | ||||
RADAR (Ref) | 28.33 | - | - | - |
Classical | 37.78 | 18.874 | 15.136-22.613 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Results of univariate regression and multivariate analysis of variables with respect to success
Univariate regression analysis | |||
Variable | Unadjusted OR | 95%CI | P value |
Age (years) | |||
18-40 (Ref) | - | - | 0.360 |
40-55 | 0.628 | 0.180-2.194 | 0.466 |
> 55 | 2.879 | 0.313-26.506 | 0.351 |
Sex | |||
Male | 0.333 | 0.099-1.118 | 0.075 |
Female (Ref) | |||
CKD duration | 0.909 | 0.742-1.114 | 0.358 |
Hemodialysis duration | 1.376 | 0.657-2.880 | 0.397 |
BMI | 1.144 | 0.793-1.651 | 0.472 |
Radial artery diam | 3.961 | 0.088-178.903 | 0.479 |
Cephalic vein diam | 15.969 | 14.160-25.856 | 0.003 |
Procedure | |||
Radar (Ref) | 0.145 | 0.030-0.699 | 0.016 |
Classical | |||
Maturation time | 0.744 | 0.540-1.025 | 0.070 |
Complication | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.996 |
Multivariate regression analysis | |||
RADAR (Ref) | 0.091 | 0.013-0.663 | 0.018 |
Cephalic vein diameter | 3.907 | 2.397-31.3 | 0.002 |
- Citation: Sarangi SS, Kumar S, Bhirud DP, Singh M, Navriya SC, Choudhary GR, Sandhu AS. Radial artery deviation and reimplantation technique vs classical technique in arterio-venous fistula: A randomised control trial. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(2): 100092
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v14/i2/100092.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.100092