Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2017; 7(3): 203-212
Published online Jun 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i3.203
Published online Jun 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i3.203
Table 1 Summary of the descriptive statistics for donor (d) and the recipient (r) that form the study donor after cardiac death cohort from which the donor after cardiac death risk index score was developed
DCD donor and recipient variables | All (n = 261) | ||
Donor | dAge (yr) | 46.1 ± 17.9 | |
dBMI | 26 ± 4.9 | ||
ITU Stay (d) | 3.9 ± 5.8 | ||
COD (CVA: Other: HBI: Trauma) | 52.5:13.8:16.9:16.9 | ||
dSodium (mmol/L) | 144.51 ± 11.8 | ||
dBilirubin (μmol/L) | 9.81 ± 6.88 | ||
Split/reduced (%) | 2.30% | ||
WIT (min) | 16.7 ± 9.8 | ||
dHepT (min) | 24.3 ± 10.6 | ||
Liver Weight (g) | 1518.28 ± 397.507 | ||
CIT (min) | 431 ± 118 | ||
Recipient | rAge (yr) | 49.45 ± 15.36 | |
rGender | 70.1%M/39.9%F | ||
rBMI | 25.9 ± 4.7 | ||
ALF (%) | 1.50% | ||
rBilirubin (mmol/L) | 89.36 ± 116.38 | ||
rINR | 1.89 ± 1.88 | ||
MELD | 14.8 ± 6.4 | ||
Location (inpatient/home) | 20.3%/79.6% | ||
Prior abdominal surgery (yr) | 13.40% | ||
reTPL (yr) | 5.70% | ||
Indication for TPL | Low | 68 (26%) | |
Standard | 176 (67.5%) | ||
High | 17 (6.5%) |
Table 2 Point allocation system for the donor after cardiac death risk index score
Donor/recipient predictor variables | HR (CI) | Points |
Primary indication for transplant | ||
Low (P = 0.07) | ||
Standard (P = 0.05) | 2 (1-4.04) | 2 |
High (P = 0.04) | 2.83 (1.04-7.24) | 3 |
reTPL (P = 0.26) | 1.87 (0.63-5.58) | 2 |
MELD > 25 (P = 0.04) | 2.75 (1.04-7.24) | 3 |
CIT > 10 h (P = 0.6) | 1.37 (0.4-4.04) | 1 |
WIT > 25 min (P = 0.4) | 1.48 (0.6-3.63) | 1 |
dHepT | ||
40-60 min (P = 0.5) | 1.36 (0.53-3.53) | 1 |
> 60 min (P = 0.05) | 4.4 (1.02-19.04) | 4 |
Table 3 Internal validation of the donor after cardiac death risk index in predicting donor after cardiac death graft survival
DCD Graft Survival (mo) | DCD-RI class | ||
DCD-RI ≤ 1, low (n = 10/27%) | DCD-RI 2-4, standard (n = 8/21.6%) | DCD-RI ≥ 5, high (n = 19/51.4%) | |
3 | |||
Actual | 100 | 92.6 | 75 |
Predicted | 96 (100-83.8) | 90 (100-76.8) | 80 (96.2-63.8) |
6 | |||
Actual | 100 | 85.2 | 75 |
Predicted | 95 (100-83.7) | 90 (100-83.8) | 75 (91.2-58.8) |
12 | |||
Actual | 100 | 77.8 | 75 |
Predicted | 93 (100-76.8) | 87 (100-70.8) | 40 (56.2-23.8) |
60 | |||
Actual | 100 | 63 | 50 |
Predicted | 86 (100-83.8) | 78 (94.2-61.8) | 34 (50.2-17.8) |
- Citation: Khorsandi SE, Giorgakis E, Vilca-Melendez H, O’Grady J, Heneghan M, Aluvihare V, Suddle A, Agarwal K, Menon K, Prachalias A, Srinivasan P, Rela M, Jassem W, Heaton N. Developing a donation after cardiac death risk index for adult and pediatric liver transplantation. World J Transplant 2017; 7(3): 203-212
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v7/i3/203.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v7.i3.203