Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2016; 6(4): 665-674
Published online Dec 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.665
Table 1 Unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant vs matched related and matched unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Ref.DiseaseConditioning regimen (n)Graft type (n)GVHD prophylaxisNeutrophil engraftmentGrade II-IV acute GVHDChronic GVHDRelapse rateDFSOS
Bashey et al[69] 2013 n = 271Acute leukemia/CML/myeloma/lymphoma/MDSRIC (102) MA (169)MRD (117) MUD (101) Haplo (53)CNI based CNI based CNI + MMF + PT-CyNR6 mo 27% 39% 30% (P = NS)2 yr 54% 54% 38% (P < 0.05)2 yr 34% 34% 33% (P = NS)2 yr 53% 52% 60% (P = NS)2 yr 76% 67% 64% (P = NS)
Di Stasi et al[70] 2014 n = 227AML/MDSRIC (227)MRD (81) MUD (108) Haplo (32)CNI + MTX CNI + MTX + ATG CNI + MMF + PT-Cy30 d 99% 96% 97% (P = 0.44)100 d 24% 19% 26% (P = 0.68)3 yr 46% 42% 24% (P = 0.52)1 yr 28% 23% 33% (P = 0.75)3 yr 36% 27% 30% (P = 0.12)NR
Luo et al[71] 2014 n = 305Acute leukemia/lymphoma/MDSMA + ATG (305)MRD (90) MUD (116) Haplo (99)CNI + MMF + MTX CNI + MMF + MTX CNI + MMF + MTX15 d 97% 97% 78% (P < 0.001)3 mo 15.60% 39% 42% (P < 0.0001)2 yr 24% 41% 41% (P = NS)5 yr 34% 21% 14% Haplo vs MRD P = 0.008 Haplo vs MUD P = 0.175 yr 63% 58% 58% (P = 0.57)5 yr 77% 63% 60.80% Haplo vs MRD P = 0.026 Haplo vs MUD P = 0.38
Ciurea et al[63] 2015 n = 2174AMLRIC (825) MA (1349)MUD (737) Haplo (88) MUD (1245) Haplo (104)CNI + MMF or MTX CNI + MMF + PT-Cy CNI + MMF or MTX CNI + MMF + PT-Cy30 d 93% 96% (P = 0.25) 90% 96% (P = 0.02)3 mo 19% 28% (P = 0.05) 16% 33% (P = 0.001)3 yr 34% 52% (P = 0.002) 30% 53% (P < 0.0001)3 yr 58% 42% (P = 0.006) 44% 39% (P = 0.37)3 yr 9% 23% (P = 0.0001) 14% 20% (P = 0.14)3 yr 46% 44% (P = 0.71) 45% 50% (P = 0.38)
Wang et al[64] 2015 n = 450AML in CR1MA (ATG in haplo cohort)MRD (219) Haplo (231)CNI + MMF + MTX CNI + MMF + MTXNE engraftment 2 d longer after MRD P = 0.004100 d 36% 13% (P < 0.001)1 yr 42% 15% (P < 0.001)3 yr 15% 15% (P = 0.98)3 yr 74% 78% (P = 0.34)3 yr 79% 82% (P = 0.36)
Ghosh et al[67] 2016 n = 987LymphomaRIC (987)MRD (807) Haplo (180)CNI based PT-Cy ± CNI28 d 95% 97% (P = 0.31)100 d 25% 27% -0.841 yr 45% 12% (P < 0.001)3 yr 37% 40% (P = 0.51)3 yr 48% 48% (P = 0.98)3 yr 62% 61% (P = 0.82)
Kanate et al[72] 2016 n = 917LymphomaRIC (917)MUD + ATG (241) MUD (491) Haplo (185)CNI based CNI based PT-Cy based28 d 97% 97% 94% (P = 0.32)100 d 17% 12% 8% (P = 0.44)1 yr 33% 51% 13% (P < 0.001)3 yr 36% 28% 36% (P = 0.07)3 yr 38% 49% 47% (P = 0.02)3 yr 50% 62% 60% (P = 0.2)