Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Mar 24, 2016; 6(1): 115-124
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.115
Table 1 Criteria of sufficiency of recovery with easily-explantable counterpulsation devices and continuous flow left ventricular assist devices
Counterpulsation devices
EF↑ 5%
BNP< 500 pg/mL
Continuous flow LVADs
LVEDD< 60 mm
LV end-systolic diameter< 50 mm
EF> 45%
LV end-diastolic pressure/PCWP< 12 mmHg
Cardiac Index (resting)> 2.8 L/min per square
Table 2 Effects of counterpulsation on systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular mechanoenergetics
Decrease
Systolic aortic pressure
End-diastolic aortic pressure
LV systolic wall stress (afterload)
Myocardial oxygen/LV energy consumption
End-diastolic ventricular volume (preload)
Mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
Increase
Diastolic aortic pressure (augmentation)
LV mechanical performance (ejection fraction, stroke volume, cardiac output)
LV contractility and active relaxation (in the reperfused failing heart)
Coronary blood flow (post-ischemia, when coronary autoregulation is impaired and flow is pressure-dependent)[33]
Cerebral, renal, mesenteric and pulmonary blood flow
Mean arterial pressure (in patients with shock)
Table 3 Potential roles of long-term intra-aortic balloon pump support in chronic heart failure
Improves patients’ clinical status and their hemodynamic indices, rendering them suitable candidates for heart transplantation (BTT)
Improves RV functionality and peripheral organ function, increasing the candidacy rates of patients who are illegible for additional mechanical interventions (BTC)
Enhances native LV functional performance and unloads LV while maintaining its integrity, promoting reverse remodeling and cardiac recovery (BTR)