Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Mar 24, 2016; 6(1): 103-114
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103
Table 1 Expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation: Epidemiological data
| Pro | Contra |
| Annual mortality rate in dialysis patients exceeds 20%[2] | 70% increased risk for graft failure vs SCD kidneys[12] |
| Rapidly growing transplant waiting lists and, subsequently, increasingly longer waiting times[1-3] | 17% primary graft non-function vs SCD kidneys[12] |
| Survival advantage of ECD kidney transplant recipients over dialysis patients remaining on transplant waiting list[2,4,6,15] | 38% of ECD kidneys were discarded vs 9% for all other kidneys[12] |
| Increased treatment cost and resource use[3,4] | |
| Mortality in perioperative period greater in ECD kidney recipients[4,13] | |
| Higher DGF rates, more acute rejection episodes and decreased long-term graft function in ECD vs SCD kidneys[12-14] |
| Patients older than 40 yr |
| Long median waiting time (> 4 yr) |
| Patients with diabetes or hypertension |
| Patients of low immunological risk |
| Dialysis patients with vascular access problems |
| Dialysis patients whose life expectancy in dialysis is lower than the estimated waiting time for kidney transplantation |
Table 3 Expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation: Maximizing benefit
| Modifying allocation rules for ECD kidneys in an effort to match the appropriate kidney to the appropriate recipient |
| Minimizing risk factors for DGF: Lowering CIT, pulsatile perfusion preservation |
| Preimplantation renal biopsy for ECD kidney recipients |
| Simultaneous dual ECD kidney transplantation |
| Restricting the use of ECD kidneys to patients of low immunological risk |
| Applying individualized immunosuppressive regimens |
Table 4 Modifying and individualizing the immunosuppressive regimen in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation: Main strategies
| Induction with ATG |
| Reduce overall immunosuppression burden, especially in elderly recipients of ECD kidney transplants |
| Reduced CNI exposure regimens (target CNI blood levels 25%-50% lower) |
| Delayed CNI introduction regimens |
| CNI-free regimens based on MMF and steroids with ATG induction |
| CNI-free Belatacept-based regimens |
| Reduced CNI exposure and CNI-free mTOR-inhibitors-based regimens |
- Citation: Filiopoulos V, Boletis JN. Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: Which is the optimal immunosuppression? World J Transplant 2016; 6(1): 103-114
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i1/103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103
