Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2015; 5(2): 38-43
Published online Jun 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38
Published online Jun 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38
Table 1 Formulae for calculating Kidney Donor Profile Index and expected post-transplant survival
KDPI |
KDPI = exp (-0.0194 × I[age < 18 year] × [age - 18 year] + 0.0128 × [age - 40 year] + 0.0107 × I[age > 50 year] + 0.179 × I[race = African American] + 0.126 × I[hypertensive] + 0.130 × I[diabetic] + 0.220 × [SCr - 1 mg/dL] - 0.209 × I[SCr 1.5 mg/dL] × [SCr - 1.5 mg/dL] + 0.0881 × I[cause of death = CVA] - 0.0464 × [{height - 170 cm}/10] - 0.0199 × I[weight < 80 kg] × [{weight - 80 kg}/5] + 0.133 × I[donation after cardiac death] + 0.240 × I[hepatitis C] - 0.0766, where I is equal to 1 if the condition is true and I is equal to 0 if the condition is false |
EPTS |
EPTS score = 0.047 × MAX (age - 25. 0) - 0.015 × Diabetes × MAX (Age - 25.0) + 0.398 × Prior Organ Transplant - 0.237 × Diabetes × Prior Organ Transplant + 0.315 × log(Years on Dialysis + 1) - 0.099 × Diabetes × log(Years on Dialysis + 1) + 0.130 × (Years on Dialysis = 0) - 0.348 × Diabetes × (Years on Dialysis = 0) + 1.262 × Diabetes |
Table 2 Points awarded to wait-listed candidates in the new kidney allocation system
Candidate features | Points awarded |
The waiting time (date of listing with GFR < 20 mL/min, or date of initiation of dialysis) | 1 per year (1/365 per day) |
Pediatric candidates at time of match with 0- ABDR mismatch donor | 4 (if child is 0-10 yr) 3 (if child is 11-17 yr) |
Pediatric candidate at time of match if KDPI < 35% | 1 |
Prior living donor | 4 |
Level of sensitization (cPRA ≥ 20%) | 0-202, see description |
Single HLA-DR mismatch with donor | 1 |
Zero HLA-DR mismatch with donor | 2 |
Table 3 Comparison of old vs new allocation policies
Old kidney allocation system (effective 1988 - 12/3/2014) | New kidney allocation system (effective 12/4/2014 onwards) |
Wait list time starts from time of listing | Wait list time starts from time of listing or date of initiation of dialysis, whichever comes first |
The quality of organs described based on the terms SCD, ECD and DCD kidneys | The quality of organs assessed by a KDPI score (0%-100%) |
No metric was involved in allocating kidneys depending on the expected long- term outcomes of the transplant candidates | Longevity matching is used to allocate kidneys depending on the KDPI and EPTS scores |
Only 4 priority points were given for HLA sensitization for a cPRA ≥ 80% | Gradation of priority points given based on HLA sensitization for cPRA ≥ 20% range from 1-202, which can bring the recipient much higher on the list |
Long wait time for blood group B candidates | In order to decrease wait times for B blood group candidates, A2/A2B blood type donors acceptable |
Pay back system present | Pay back system eliminated |
Priority given to pediatric candidates: share 35 (donor age < 35 yr) | Pediatric candidates still get priority for kidneys with KDPI < 35% |
National and regional sharing for sensitized patients was not mandated | National, regional and local priority sharing of organs for highly sensitized patients with cPRA of 100%, 99% and 98% respectively |
High discard rate existed for marginal ECD/ DCD kidneys | Regional sharing of marginal kidneys (KDPI > 85%) is proposed |
- Citation: Chopra B, Sureshkumar KK. Changing organ allocation policy for kidney transplantation in the United States. World J Transplant 2015; 5(2): 38-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v5/i2/38.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38