Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2015.
    
    
        World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2015; 5(2): 38-43
Published online Jun 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38
Published online Jun 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38
            Table 1 Formulae for calculating Kidney Donor Profile Index and expected post-transplant survival
        
    | KDPI | 
| KDPI = exp (-0.0194 × I[age < 18 year] × [age - 18 year] + 0.0128 × [age - 40 year] + 0.0107 × I[age > 50 year] + 0.179 × I[race = African American] + 0.126 × I[hypertensive] + 0.130 × I[diabetic] + 0.220 × [SCr - 1 mg/dL] - 0.209 × I[SCr 1.5 mg/dL] × [SCr - 1.5 mg/dL] + 0.0881 × I[cause of death = CVA] - 0.0464 × [{height - 170 cm}/10] - 0.0199 × I[weight < 80 kg] × [{weight - 80 kg}/5] + 0.133 × I[donation after cardiac death] + 0.240 × I[hepatitis C] - 0.0766, where I is equal to 1 if the condition is true and I is equal to 0 if the condition is false | 
| EPTS | 
| EPTS score = 0.047 × MAX (age - 25. 0) - 0.015 × Diabetes × MAX (Age - 25.0) + 0.398 × Prior Organ Transplant - 0.237 × Diabetes × Prior Organ Transplant + 0.315 × log(Years on Dialysis + 1) - 0.099 × Diabetes × log(Years on Dialysis + 1) + 0.130 × (Years on Dialysis = 0) - 0.348 × Diabetes × (Years on Dialysis = 0) + 1.262 × Diabetes | 
            Table 2 Points awarded to wait-listed candidates in the new kidney allocation system
        
    | Candidate features | Points awarded | 
| The waiting time (date of listing with GFR < 20 mL/min, or date of initiation of dialysis) | 1 per year (1/365 per day) | 
| Pediatric candidates at time of match with 0- ABDR mismatch donor | 4 (if child is 0-10 yr) 3 (if child is 11-17 yr) | 
| Pediatric candidate at time of match if KDPI < 35% | 1 | 
| Prior living donor | 4 | 
| Level of sensitization (cPRA ≥ 20%) | 0-202, see description | 
| Single HLA-DR mismatch with donor | 1 | 
| Zero HLA-DR mismatch with donor | 2 | 
            Table 3 Comparison of old vs new allocation policies
        
    | Old kidney allocation system (effective 1988 - 12/3/2014) | New kidney allocation system (effective 12/4/2014 onwards) | 
| Wait list time starts from time of listing | Wait list time starts from time of listing or date of initiation of dialysis, whichever comes first | 
| The quality of organs described based on the terms SCD, ECD and DCD kidneys | The quality of organs assessed by a KDPI score (0%-100%) | 
| No metric was involved in allocating kidneys depending on the expected long- term outcomes of the transplant candidates | Longevity matching is used to allocate kidneys depending on the KDPI and EPTS scores | 
| Only 4 priority points were given for HLA sensitization for a cPRA ≥ 80% | Gradation of priority points given based on HLA sensitization for cPRA ≥ 20% range from 1-202, which can bring the recipient much higher on the list | 
| Long wait time for blood group B candidates | In order to decrease wait times for B blood group candidates, A2/A2B blood type donors acceptable | 
| Pay back system present | Pay back system eliminated | 
| Priority given to pediatric candidates: share 35 (donor age < 35 yr) | Pediatric candidates still get priority for kidneys with KDPI < 35% | 
| National and regional sharing for sensitized patients was not mandated | National, regional and local priority sharing of organs for highly sensitized patients with cPRA of 100%, 99% and 98% respectively | 
| High discard rate existed for marginal ECD/ DCD kidneys | Regional sharing of marginal kidneys (KDPI > 85%) is proposed | 
- Citation: Chopra B, Sureshkumar KK. Changing organ allocation policy for kidney transplantation in the United States. World J Transplant 2015; 5(2): 38-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v5/i2/38.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        