BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Correspondence
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Jun 18, 2026; 16(2): 118962
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.118962
Table 1 Evidence-based alignment of induction therapy with recipient risk profiles
Recipient profile
Preferred induction strategy
Clinical rationale and risk-benefit balance
Strength of supporting evidence
Mandatory clinical safeguards
Standard immunologic risk (e.g., first transplant, low PRA, no DSA, well-matched donor)Basiliximab (IL-2 receptor antagonist)Preservation of immune competence: Prioritizes long-term safety and graft durability over absolute minimization of early steroids. Avoids profound T-cell depletion in patients with low rejection probabilityModerate-strong (retrospective cohorts, propensity-matched analyses, guideline concordance)(1) Standard viral surveillance (cytomegalovirus, BK virus); (2) Cautious steroid minimization with close clinical monitoring; and (3) Avoidance of unnecessary maintenance immunosuppression minimization[1,2,11-14,22,23]
High immunologic risk (e.g., re-transplantation, high PRA, DSA positive)Alemtuzumab (lymphocyte-depleting agent)Rejection prevention: Accepts higher long-term risks of infection/malignancy to prevent catastrophic early antibody-mediated or cellular rejectionModerate (RCTs in selected populations, observational studies)(1) Extended viral surveillance (cytomegalovirus, BK virus PCR beyond the first post-transplant year); (2) Close monitoring for cytopenias and immune reconstitution; and (3) Dynamic reassessment of maintenance immunosuppression[6,7,9,10,17-20]
Frail, elderly, or infection-prone recipients (e.g., age > 65 years, prior malignancy, latent infections)Basiliximab (conservative strategy)Safety first: The risk of infection-related mortality or malignancy progression often exceeds the risk of graft loss due to rejection in this demographicWeak-moderate (retrospective data, expert consensus)(1) Strict avoidance of lymphocyte-depleting agents; (2) Enhanced malignancy surveillance; and (3) Individualized maintenance immunosuppression targets, often accepting lower trough levels[11,14,15,21,22,23]


Write to the Help Desk