Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Jun 18, 2026; 16(2): 118962
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.118962
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.118962
Table 1 Evidence-based alignment of induction therapy with recipient risk profiles
| Recipient profile | Preferred induction strategy | Clinical rationale and risk-benefit balance | Strength of supporting evidence | Mandatory clinical safeguards |
| Standard immunologic risk (e.g., first transplant, low PRA, no DSA, well-matched donor) | Basiliximab (IL-2 receptor antagonist) | Preservation of immune competence: Prioritizes long-term safety and graft durability over absolute minimization of early steroids. Avoids profound T-cell depletion in patients with low rejection probability | Moderate-strong (retrospective cohorts, propensity-matched analyses, guideline concordance) | (1) Standard viral surveillance (cytomegalovirus, BK virus); (2) Cautious steroid minimization with close clinical monitoring; and (3) Avoidance of unnecessary maintenance immunosuppression minimization[1,2,11-14,22,23] |
| High immunologic risk (e.g., re-transplantation, high PRA, DSA positive) | Alemtuzumab (lymphocyte-depleting agent) | Rejection prevention: Accepts higher long-term risks of infection/malignancy to prevent catastrophic early antibody-mediated or cellular rejection | Moderate (RCTs in selected populations, observational studies) | (1) Extended viral surveillance (cytomegalovirus, BK virus PCR beyond the first post-transplant year); (2) Close monitoring for cytopenias and immune reconstitution; and (3) Dynamic reassessment of maintenance immunosuppression[6,7,9,10,17-20] |
| Frail, elderly, or infection-prone recipients (e.g., age > 65 years, prior malignancy, latent infections) | Basiliximab (conservative strategy) | Safety first: The risk of infection-related mortality or malignancy progression often exceeds the risk of graft loss due to rejection in this demographic | Weak-moderate (retrospective data, expert consensus) | (1) Strict avoidance of lymphocyte-depleting agents; (2) Enhanced malignancy surveillance; and (3) Individualized maintenance immunosuppression targets, often accepting lower trough levels[11,14,15,21,22,23] |
- Citation: Galassi L, Altamura E, Azzahrani L, Facchinetti F, Ravini ML. Letter to the Editor: Induction therapy as a long-term commitment: Lessons from comparative outcomes of alemtuzumab and basiliximab. World J Transplant 2026; 16(2): 118962
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i2/118962.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.118962