Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Dec 18, 2025; 15(4): 104675
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104675
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104675
Table 1 Risk of bias assessment (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)
Table 2 Demographic characteristics of included studies
| Ref. | Year | Country | Study period | Study design | Conduit material | Total No. of LT | Aorto-hepatic conduits | Supra-coeliac/infra-renal | Median follow up (months) |
| Hummel et al[11] | 2014 | Germany | 2005-2008 | Retrospective | IA | 114 | 15 | 8/7 | NA |
| Denecke et al[12] | 2016 | Austria | 1990-2012 | Retrospective | IA | 947 | 43 | 1/42 | NA |
| Li et al[13] | 2017 | Taiwan | 2002-2015 | Retrospective | GSV | NA | 11 | 11/0 | NA |
| Kazemi et al[14] | 2017 | Iran | 2011-2016 | Retrospective | IA | 2135 | 76 | 0/76 | NA |
| Jung et al[15] | 2018 | Korea | 2011-2016 | Retrospective | IA | 1928 | 25 | 0/25 | 3 |
| Oberkofler et al[16] | 2018 | Switzerland | 2007-2016 | Retrospective | IA | 361 | 29 | 2/27 | 46 |
| Bhatti et al[17] | 2019 | Pakistan | 2012-2017 | Retrospective | GSV | 452 | 19 | 3/16 | 18 |
| Livingston et al[18] | 2019 | United States | 2000-2016 | Retrospective | IA | 3125 | 104 | 22/82 | 52.8 |
| Vivarelli et al[19] | 2020 | Italy (multicentre) | 2003-2018 | Retrospective | IA/Axillary | 4255 | 120 | 64/56 | SC: 47.5; IR: 62.5 |
| Devcic et al[20] | 2020 | USA | 2000-2016 | Retrospective | IA | 3125 | 104 | NA | NA |
| Oberkofler et al[21] | 2021 | International multicentre (14 centres) | 2007-2016 | Retrospective | IA/Prosthetic | 11133 | 565 | 111/42 (Iliac = 14) | 36.5 |
| Beaurepaire et al[8] | 2022 | France | 2002-2017 | Retrospective | IA/Prosthetic | 1677 | 68 | Iliac artery: SC + IR = 50, Iliac = 6. Prosthesis: SC = 1, IR = 6, Iliac = 5 | 61 |
| Bhatti et al[22] | 2023 | Pakistan | 2017-2020 | Retrospective | GSV | 498 | 14 | 4/10 | 34.9 |
| Sohrabi et al[23] | 2024 | Iran | 2009-2020 | Retrospective | IA | 4010 | 16 | 0/16 | 35 |
Table 3 Recipient characteristics of studies included for meta-analysis, n (%)
| Ref. | Year | No. of Patients | Recipient age, median (SD) | Recipient gender (male%) | Recipient BMI (kg/m2) | Redo transplant | Indications for Transplant (V-Viral, A- Alcohol, M-MASLD, O-Other, NA-not available) | MELD | Previous TACE | ||||||||
| SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | ||
| Hummel et al[11] | 2014 | 8 | 7 | 50.9 (12.2) | 46.6 (14.3) | 6 (75) | 7 (100) | 23.5 (3) | 27.4 (3.7) | 3 (37.5) | 3 (42.9) | NA | NA | 22.7 (11.7) | 16.5(9.5) | NA | NA |
| Livingston et al[18] | 2019 | 22 | 82 | 51.5 (13.3) | 52.7 (10.7) | 14 (63.6) | 57 (69.5) | 25.7 (5.5) | 26.3 (5.2) | 10 (45.5) | 45 (54.9) | NA | NA | 19.6 (9.7) | 19.0 (10.4) | NA | NA |
| Vivarelli et al[19] | 2020 | 64 | 56 | 49.5 (14.4) | 49.5 (11.8) | 45 (70.3) | 41 (73.2) | 24.2(3.6) | 25.5 (4.9) | 16 (25.0) | 14 (25.0) | V-32 (50.0%) A-8 (12.5%) M-8 (12.5%) O-3 (4.7%) | V-30 (53.6%) A-6 (10.7%),M-2 (3.6%),O-4 (7.1%) | 22.7 (10.7) | 18.7 (7.8) | 13 (20.3) | 12 (21.4) |
| Oberkofler et al[21] | 2021 | 111 | 428 | 52.5 (11.9) | 53.2 (4.9) | 65 (59.0) | 261 (61.0) | 25.1(1.4) | 25.5 (2.0) | 54 (49.0) | 147 (34.0) | NA | NA | 25.0 (5.2) | 22.7 (6.3) | 20.0 (20.0) | 61 (15.0) |
Table 4 Details of aorto-hepatic conduits in the included studies, n (%)
| Ref. | Year | Number of patients | Early occlusions | Late occlusion | Bile duct complications | Graft survival 1-year | Graft survival 5-year | Patient survival 1-year | Patient survival 5-year | ||||||||
| SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | ||
| Hummel et al[11] | 2014 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (50.0) | 3 (42.9) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 57.1% | 85.7% | NA | NA |
| Livingston et al[18] | 2019 | 22 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | NA | NA | 85.1% | 79.1% | 53.9% | 56.0% | 85.1% | 88.3% | 67.8% | 64.9% |
| Vivarelli et al[19] | 2020 | 64 | 56 | 4 (6.2) | 6 (10.7) | 3 (4.7) | 11 (19.6) | 20 (31.2) | 22 (39.3) | 77.0% | 66.0% | 67.0% | 50.0% | 80.0% | 73.0% | 74.0% | 56.0% |
| Oberkofler et al[21] | 2021 | 111 | 428 | 9 (8.1) | 31 (7.2) | 9 (8.0) | 41 (9.8) | 21 (19.0) | 61 (14.0) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Table 5 Complications related to aorto-hepatic conduits in the included studies, n (%)
| Ref. | Year | No. of AHCs | Total occlusions | Surgical interventions for oocclusions | Endovascular intervensions for occlusions | Success rate of surgery without retransplantation | Success rate of endovascular | |||||
| Re-anastomosis | Re-conduit formation | Retransplants | Stent | PTA | Stent/PTA | CDTL | ||||||
| Hummel et al[11] | 2014 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
| Livingston et al[18] | 2019 | 104 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Vivarelli et al[19] | 2020 | 120 | 24 (20.0) | 3 (12.5) | NA | 8 (33.0) | 8 (33.0) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Oberkofler et al[21] | 2021 | 565 | 96 (17.0) | 8 (8.3) | 4 (4.2) | 22 (23.0) | 4 (4.2) | 12 (13.0) | 7 (7.3) | 6 (11.0) | 7 (27.0) | 18 (82.0) |
| Sohrabi et al[23] | 2024 | 16 | 2 (12.5) | 0 | 0 | 2 (100) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
| Devcic et al[20] | 2020 | 104 | 7 (6.7.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (100) | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
Table 6 Other complications in patients receiving aorto-hepatic conduits, n (%)
| Ref. | Year | Number of patients | Pre-Cr at LT (mg/dL) | Post-Cr maximum (mg/dL) | Post-transplant CRRT | Early allograft dysfunction | Major surgical interventions (Clavien 3b>0) | ||||||
| SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | SC | IR | ||
| Hummel et al[11] | 2014 | 8 | 7 | 0.56 (0.33) | 0.97 (0.37) | 0.8 | 1.47 | NA | NA | 0 | 0 | 1 (12.5) | 1 (14.3) |
| Livingston et al[18] | 2019 | 22 | 82 | 1.15 (0.71) | 1.20 (0.72) | 1.17 (0.22) | 1.2 (0.26) | 2 (10.5) | 10 (12.2) | 4 (18.2) | 24 (29.3) | NA | NA |
| Vivarelli et al[19] | 2020 | 64 | 56 | 1.35 (0.79) | 1.82 (1.1) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4 (6.2) | 6 (10.7) | NA | NA |
| Oberkofler et al[21] | 2021 | 111 | 428 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 35 (32.0) | 122 (29.0) | 9 (8.1) | 31 (7.2) | 66 (60.0) | 248 (58.0) |
Table 7 Summary table aorto-hepatic conduits
| Aorto-hepatic conduit details | Number of studies that have reported (n = 14) |
| Infow sites | 14 |
| Conduit material | 14 |
| Second party vs third party donor | 1 |
| Storage of the conduits | 0 |
| Reason for conduit | 9 |
| Choice of inflow site | 12 |
| Post-operative doppler monitoring | 12 |
| Post-operative anticoagulation | 9 |
| Early occlusions | 8 |
| Late occlusions | 8 |
| Endovascular Interventions for occlusions | 3 |
| Surgical interventions (revisions/reconduits/retransplants) | 4 |
- Citation: Uragoda Appuhamilage B, Gupta S, Parente A, Srinivasan P, Menon K, Hakeem AR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of aorto-hepatic conduits in liver transplant: Known knowns and known unknowns. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 104675
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v15/i4/104675.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104675
