Vagiotas L, Stangou M, Kasimatis E, Xochelli A, Myserlis G, Lioulios G, Nikolaidou V, Panteli M, Ouranos K, Antoniadis N, Maria D, Papagianni A, Tsoulfas G, Fylaktou A. Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation. World J Transplant 2022; 12(10): 313-324 [PMID: 36313234 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Maria Stangou, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration General Hospital, 49 Konstantinoupoleos Street, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece. mstangou@auth.gr
Research Domain of This Article
Transplantation
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Transplant. Oct 18, 2022; 12(10): 313-324 Published online Oct 18, 2022. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313
Table 1 Clinical and demographic characteristics of kidney transplant recipients
Characteristics
Age, yr, median (range)
46 (13-70)
Male/female
49/22
Living kidney donor
22.5%
Deceased kidney donor
77.5%
Previous kidney transplant
7.0%
Preemptive transplantation
4.2%
PRA(-)
60.5%
Early rejection, within first 6 mo after KT
4.2%
Induction therapy
Basiliximab
84.5%
ATG
15.5%
Maintenance immune suppression
Tacrolimus/mycophenolate/prednisone
100.0%
Other
0.0%
Distribution of underlying kidney disease
Polycystic kidney disease
22.5%
Primary glomerulopathies
21.1%
Reflux nephropathy
12.6%
Diabetes mellitus
4.2%
Nephrosclerosis/hypertension
4.2%
Urinary tract infections/ stones
3.7%
Other
16.2%
Unknown
15.5%
Table 2 Differences between panel reactive antibodies (-) and (+) patients
Parameter
T0 (at renal transplantation)
PRA(-)
PRA(+)
P value
Age, yr
45 (13-65)
47 (14-70)
NS
HDV, mo
82.5 (0-251)
112 (0-165)
NS
Time of cold ischemia, h
18 (0-30)
16.5 (0-30.5)
NS
Pre-emptive RT, %
6 (13.6)
1 (3.6)
NS
Acute rejection episode, %
2 (4.5)
1 (3.6)
NS
ATG administration, %
5 (11.4)
7 (25)
NS
DGF, %
7 (15.9)
4 (14.3)
NS
Table 3 Lymphocyte numbers and subpopulations in panel reactive antibodies (-) and (+) patients at time of transplantation (T0)
Parameter
T0, at renal transplantation
All patients
PRA(-)
PRA(+)
n
71
43
28
Lymphocyte, %
18.1 (6.4-40)
18.8 (6.4-38.4)
17.8 (11.2-40)
Lymphocyte, cells/μL
1200 (700-2800)
1200 (700-2800)
1100 (700-2600)
CD4+, %
42.0 (20.6-68.6)
44.4 (20.6-68.6)
41.5 (25.3-59.5)
CD4+, cells/μL
515 (206-1453.2)
557 (206-1453.2)
435 (253-1362.4)
CD8+, %
24.55 (10.5-53.1)
25.1 (12,2-37.7)
23.4 (10.5-53.1)
CD8+, cells/μL
301.5 (91.7-665.6)
301.5 (102.9-641.7)
294.9 (91.7-665.6)
CD4+/CD8+
1.7 (0.6-5.6)
1.5 (0.9-5.6)
2 (0.6-5)
CD4+CD28-, %
5.4 (0.0-33.7)
4.8 (0.2-33.7)
7.2 (0-32.1)
CD4+CD28-, cells/μL
26.9 (0.0-206)
26.7 (0-160)
27.3 (0-206)
CD8+CD28-, %
38.6 (6.1-91.5)
38.3 (6.1-68.2)
48.4 (15.1-91.5)
CD8+CD28-, cells/μL
121.5 (13-583)
113.6 (17-315)
122 (13-583)
CD16/56, %
18 (3.6-50.6)
17.7 (3.6-50.6)
18.4 (4.4-34.2)
CD16/56, cells/μL
198.1 (50.4-750.5)
210 (50.4-750.5)
190.4 (94.8-393.6)
Tregs, %, on CD4
4 (0.1-11.5)
3.9 (0.1-11.5)
4.2 (1.5-7.3)
Tregs, cells/μL
20 (0.52-74.38)
20.2 (0.5-74.3)
18.9 (5.8-73.5)
Table 4 Changes in T lymphocyte subpopulations at T0, T3, and T6 time points in patients with panel reactive antibodies (-)
Parameter
T0
T3
T6
P value
Lymphocyte, %
18.8 (6.4-38.4)
23 (10.9-47.9)
25.4 (8.4-52)
0.001
Lymphocyte, cells/μL
1200 (700-2800)
1650 (700-4100)
1900 (800-3700)
< 0.0001
CD4+, %
44.4 (20.6-68.6)
49.8 (22.7-77.1)
49.1 (16.2-71.4)
0.004
CD4+, cells/μL
557 (206-1453.2)
782 (261.8-1951.6)
872 (330-2001.6)
< 0.0001
CD8+, %
25.1 (12.2-37.7)
26.9 (12.4-50.1)
27.4 (13.3-49)
NS
CD8+, cells/μL
301.5 (102.9-641.7)
456.3 (148.6-1402.8)
514.5 (189.2-1397.8)
< 0.0001
CD4CD28null, %
4.8 (0.2-33.7)
2.8 (0-21.1)
2.7 (0.1-36.4)
NS
CD4CD28null, cells/μL
26.7 (0.9-149)
27.5 (0-160)
26.5 (09-241)
NS
CD8CD28null, %
38.3 (6.1-68.2)
28.4 (8.3-80.5)
32.8 (6.7-90.7)
NS
CD8CD28null, cells/μL
113.6 (17-315)
112.6 (28-1129)
158 (18-1267)
NS
CD16/56, %
17.7 (3.6-50.6)
6.6 (1.9-24.2)
9.3 (2.9-28.6)
< 0.0001
CD16/56, cells/μL
210 (50.4-750.5)
121.6 (33-622.2)
151.2 (44-774.4)
< 0.0001
Tregs, %, on CD4
3.9 (0.1-11.5)
3.3 (0.9-6.8)
4.1 (1.4-8.8)
NS
Tregs, cells/μL
20.2 (0.5-74.3)
29.4 (7.5-122.9)
38.4 (8-104)
< 0.0001
Table 5 Changes in T lymphocyte subpopulations at T0, T3, and T6 time points in patients with panel reactive antibodies (+)
Parameter
T0
T3
T6
P value
Lymphocyte, %
17.8 (11.2-40)
16.4 (7.5-36.8)
20.9 (12.2-36.4)
0.07
Lymphocyte, cells/μL
1100 (700-2600)
1300 (700-3600)
1700 (525-3200)
0.009
CD4+, %
41.5 (25.3-59.5)
42.3 (29.2-65.3)
46.5 (27.4-62)
NS
CD4+, cells/μL
435 (253-1362.4)
548.9 (292-1371.3)
744 (220-1888)
0.008
CD8+, %
23.4 (10.5-53.1)
27.4 (10.3-53.6)
29.9 (11.6-56.2)
0.005
CD8+, cells/μL
294.9 (91.7-665.6)
408 (123.6-1234.8)
504.9 (114.4-955.4)
< 0.0001
CD4CD28null, %
7.2 (0-32.1)
5.3 (0.2-24.8)
4 (0.1-28.6)
NS
CD4CD28null, cells/μL
27.3 (0-206)
22.8 (1.5-234)
24.2 (1.3-244)
NS
CD8CD28null, %
48.4 (15.1-91.5)
47.1 (10.7-82.1)
36.5 (7.7-82)
NS
CD8CD28null, cells/μL
122.2 (13-583)
200 (19-547)
160 (22-726)
NS
CD16/56, %
18.4 (4.4-34.2)
11.4 (2.9-26)
7.9 (3-24.6)
< 0.0001
CD16/56, cells/μL
190.4 (94.8-393.6)
157.5 (34.8-450)
135.7 (23.76-385.7)
0.07
Tregs, %, on CD4
4.2 (1.5-7.3)
3.3 (1.2-6.8)
4.4 (1.4-8.6)
NS
Tregs, cells/μL
18.9 (5.8-73.5)
20.9 (7.4-65.8)
26.7 (8.5-103.8)
NS
Citation: Vagiotas L, Stangou M, Kasimatis E, Xochelli A, Myserlis G, Lioulios G, Nikolaidou V, Panteli M, Ouranos K, Antoniadis N, Maria D, Papagianni A, Tsoulfas G, Fylaktou A. Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation. World J Transplant 2022; 12(10): 313-324