Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2021; 11(3): 70-86
Published online Mar 18, 2021. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i3.70
Published online Mar 18, 2021. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i3.70
Table 1 Criteria for the inclusion of studies
Type | |
Study design | Prospective cohort design with a well-defined study population |
Study group | Post renal transplant |
Study size | Any |
Length of follow-up | Any |
Source | Peer-reviewed journals |
Language | English |
Outcome measure | Renal function, patient safety, adverse events, and graft functioning and survival |
Table 2 Characteristics of included studies
Ref. | Study design | Donor type | Belatacept based (group 1) | Tacrolimus based (group 2) | Belatacept based (group 3) |
Ferguson et al[33], 2011 | Multicentre, prospective, randomized (93 patients, 1 yr) | Living and deceased | Belatacept 10 mg/kg on day 1 and 5, then once every 2 wk through 3 mo, every 4 wk through 6 mo and 5 mg/kg from 7 mo onwards; MMF: 1 mg twice daily; Induction: Thymoglobulin + Corticosterids | Tac 0.2 mg/kg divided into two doses; Tac 0.2 mg/kg divided into two doses; Induction: Thymoglobulin + Corticosterids | Belatacept 10 mg/kg on day 1 and 5, then once every 2 wk through 3 mo, every 4 wk through 6 mo and 5 mg/kg from 7 mo onwards; SRL initiated on day 1 and dose level 7-12 ng/mL. Induction: Thymoglobulin + Corticosterids |
de Graav et al[34], 2017 | Single centre, prospective, randomized (40 patients, 1 yr) | Living | Belatacept 10 mg/kg on day 0, 4, 15, 30, 60, 90 d of transplant, following that 5 mg/kg till 12 mo | Tac 0.2 mg/kg divided into two doses. Target concentration 10 to 15 ng/mL (week 1-2); 8 to 12 ng/mL (week 3-4); 5-10 ng/mL (week > 5) | NA |
Newell et al[35], 2017 | Multicentre, prospective, randomized (19 patients, 1 yr) | Living and deceased | Belatacept 10 mg/kg on day 0 (day of transplant) and then on days 4, 14, 28, 56, and 84. After day 84, participants received a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg every 4 wk until completion of the trial; MMF: 1 mg twice daily; Induction: Thymoglobulin, rapid methylprednisolone taper | Tac 0.1 mg/kg divided into two doses; Target concentration8 to 12 ng/mL (week 24), then 5 to 8 ng/mL (week > 24); MMF: 1 mg twice daily; Induction: Thymoglobulin, rapid methylprednisolone taper | Belatacept 10 mg/kg on day 0 (day of transplant) and then on days 4, 14, 28, 56, and 84. After day 84, participants received a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg every 4 wk. Tac 0.1 mg/kg divided into two doses then adjusted to target trough levels: 8-12 ng/mL by Day 29, 5-8 ng/mL by Day 57, 3-5 ng/mL by Day 85 then stopped. MMF: 1 mg twice daily; Tac: 5 to 8 ng/mL (till 24 wk); Induction: Basiliximab + Corticosteroids |
Trial 1856257[36], 2017 | Multicentre, prospective, randomized (69 patients, 1 yr) | Living and deceased | Belatacept 10 mg/kg on day 1 (24 h of transplant) and then on days 5, 14, 28, 56, and 84. MMF: 1 mg twice daily; Induction: Thymoglobulin + Corticosteroids | Tac started on day 0/1; Target concentration 8 to 12 ng/mL (week 24), then 5 to 8 ng/mL (week > 24); MMF: 1 mg twice daily; Induction: Thymoglobulin + Corticosteroids | Belatacept 10 mg/kg on day 1 (24 h of transplant) and then on days 5, 14, 28, 56, and 84. Tac started on day 0/1; Target concentration 8 to 12 ng/mL (day 1-84) and then decreased by 1/3 at day 84 and by 1/3 at week 16. If trough levels were less than or equal to 3 ng/mL at week 20 then all tac was stopped. Otherwise, the dose was reduced by 1/2 and stopped at week 24. MMF: 1 mg twice daily; Induction: Basiliximab + Corticosteroids + Tac |
Table 3 Summary of outcomes in clinical trials
Ref. | Renal function (Gp 1 vs Gp 2) | BPAR (Gp 1 vs Gp 2) | Adverse event (Gp1 or vs Gp 2) | Remarks |
Ferguson et al[33], 2011 | 12 mo; Sr. Cr: NA; eGFR: 63.6 ± 27.27 vs 54.0 ± 14.95 mL/min; (P = 0.14) | 15.2% (5/33) vs 3.3% (1/30) (P = 0.24) | SAE/Infection: 57.5% (19/33) vs 53.3% (16/30); (P = 0.007); CMV infection: 3.0% (1/33) vs 3.3% (1/30) (P = 0.96); BK infection: 6.0% (2/33) vs 3.3% (1/30) (P = 0.59); NODAT: 0% (0/33) vs 3.3% (1/30) (P = 0.47) | Graft survival: 93.93% (31/33) vs 100% (30/30) (P = 0.51); Patient survival 93.93% (31/33) vs 100% (30/30) (P = 0.51) |
de Graav et al[34], 2017 | 12 mo; Sr. Cr: 133.5 ± 39.26 vs 127.5 ± 28.87 μmol/L (P = 0.80); eGFR: 56.25 ± 17.61 vs 54.25 ± 14.73 mL/min (P = 0.57) | 55% (11/20) vs 10% (2/20) (P = 0.006) | SAE/Infection: 10.25 ± 4.18 vs 11.90 ± 5.43 (P = 0.41); CMV infection: 10% (2/20) vs 5% (1/20) (P = 0.96); BK infection: 5% (1/20) vs 3.3% (2/20) (P = 0.54); NODAT: 5% (1/20) vs 35% (7/20) (P = 0.04) | Graft survival: 85% (17/20) vs 100% (20/20) (P = 0.22); Patient Survival 100% (20/20) vs 95% (19/20) (P = 0.31) |
Newell et al[35], 2017 | 12 mo; Sr Cr: NA; eGFR: 51.6 ± 23.5 vs 55.9 ± 8.9 mL/min (P = 0.74) | 33.3% (2/6) vs 50% (3/6) (P = 0.55) | SAE/Infection: 33.3% (2/6) vs 33.3% (2/6) (P = 1.0); CMV infection: 0% (0/6) vs 16.6% (1/6) (P = 0.29); BK infection: 0% (0/6) vs 0% (0/6) (P = 1.00); NODAT: 0% (0/6) vs 0% (0/6) (P = 1.00) | Graft survival: 50% (3/6) vs 83.33% (5/6) (P = 0.85); Patient survival 100% (6/6) vs 83.33% (5/6) (P = 0.29) |
Clinicaltrial.gov 1856257[36], 2017 | 12 mo, Sr. Cr: NA, eGFR: 61.5 ± 23.3 vs 59.2 ± 19.9 mL/min (P = 0.70) | 37.9% (11/29) vs 6.8% (2/29) (P = 0.009) | SAE/Infection: 72.41% (21/29) vs 65.5% (19/29) (P = 0.77); CMV infection: 20.6% (6/29) vs 3.4% (1/29) (P = 1.0); BK infection: 13.7% (4/29) vs 0% (0/29) (P = 0.11); NODAT: 3.4% (1/29) vs 3.4% (1/29) (P = 1.0) | Graft survival: 93.1% (27/29) vs 100% (29/29) (P = 0.49); Patient survival: 93.1% (27/29) vs 100% (29/29) (P = 0.49) |
Table 4 Summary of biopsy proven acute rejection in clinical trials
Ref. | IA | IB | IIA | IIB | III | Mixed | ||||||||
Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | |
Ferguson et al[33], 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
de Graav et al[34], 2017 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
Newell et al[35], 2017 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
Clinicaltrial.gov 1856257[36], 2017 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Table 5 Summary of metabolic outcomes in clinical trials
Parameters | Ferguson et al[33], 2011 (25) | de Graav et al[34], 2017 | Newell et al[35], 2017 (27) | Clinicaltrial.gov 1856257, 2017 (28) | ||||
Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | Gp1 (Belatacept) | Gp2 (Tacrolimus) | |
Total CH, Mean (SD) (mg/dL) | NA | NA | 193.34 ± 42.43 | 187.41 ± 42.28 | 187.0 | 156.0 ± 30.4 | 163.7 ± 38.8 | 177.1 ± 25.6 |
Total TG, Mean (SD) (mg/dL) | NA | NA | 194.86 ± 51.14 | 221 ± 127.87 | 187.0 | 319.3 ± 294.0 | 170.0 ± 118.6 | 125.8 ± 93.0 |
LDL, Mean (SD) (mg/dL) | NA | NA | 64.78 ± 30.20 | 96.67 ± 55.84 | 114.0 | 69.5 ± 38.0 | 86.3 ± 50.6 | 102.9 ± 17.7 |
BP mm/Hg (SBP/DBP) (12 mo) | 129.3 ± 19.24/73.3 ± 11.96 | 138.2 ± 19.50/77.6 ± 10.51 | 141.25 ± 14.75/74 .25 ± 8.75 | 142.5 ± 17.31/78.0 ± 13.0 | 146.7 ± 5.1/92.7 ± 9.8 | 147.5 ± 18.7/80.8 ± 12.8 | 133.7 ± 14.7/79.1 ± 10.2 | 135.0 ± 18.9/77.7 ± 10.9 |
- Citation: Kumar J, Reccia I, Virdis F, Podda M, Sharma AK, Halawa A. Belatacept in renal transplantation in comparison to tacrolimus and molecular understanding of resistance pattern: Meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Transplant 2021; 11(3): 70-86
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v11/i3/70.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v11.i3.70