Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2025; 15(3): 103958
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i3.103958
Advances in fertility preservation and pregnancy care for transplant patients
Velik Lazarov, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Second Specialised Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynaecology "Sheynovo", Sofia 1504, Bulgaria
Emilia Naseva, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia 1431, Bulgaria
Emilia Naseva, Dimitrina Georgieva Miteva, Latchezar P Tomov, Russka Shumnalieva, Tsvetelina Velikova, Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia 1407, Bulgaria
Dimitrina Georgieva Miteva, Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia 1164, Bulgaria
Latchezar P Tomov, Department of Informatics, New Bulgarian University, Sofia 1618, Bulgaria
Russka Shumnalieva, Department of Rheumatology, Clinic of Rheumatology, University Hospital "St. Anna", Medical University-Sofia, Sofia 1907, Bulgaria
Milena Peruhova, Department of Gastroenterology, Heart and Brain Hospital, Burgas 8000, Bulgaria
ORCID number: Velik Lazarov (0009-0006-0976-5132); Emilia Naseva (0000-0002-1282-8441); Russka Shumnalieva (0000-0003-2321-6536).
Author contributions: Lazarov V and Velikova T were involved in conceptualizing the idea and writing the draft; Naseva E, Miteva DG, Tomov LP, Shumnalieva R and Peruhova M wrote additional sections in the paper; Velikova T and Lazarov V craftedthe table; Velikova T was responsible for criticallyrevising the manuscript for relevant intellectual content. All of the authorsapproved the final version of the paper before submission.
Supported by European Union-Next Generation EU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, No. BG-RRP-2.004-0008.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Velik Lazarov, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Second Specialised Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynaecology "Sheynovo", Sheinovo 19, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria. dr.v.lazarov@gmail.com
Received: December 6, 2024
Revised: January 23, 2025
Accepted: February 18, 2025
Published online: September 18, 2025
Processing time: 134 Days and 8.3 Hours

Abstract

Fertility preservation and pregnancymanagement are critical considerations for patients undergoing organtransplantation. Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies, hormonalmodulation, and personalized medicine have expanded options for these patients, who face unique challenges due to immunosuppressive therapy and organ functionconcerns. This mini-review explores advancements in cryopreservationtechniques, pre-conception counseling, and multidisciplinary strategies forsafe pregnancies post-transplantation. Emphasis is placed on balancing maternalhealth, graft function, and fetal outcomes. The integration of reproductive andtransplant medicine is paving the way for improved quality of life andreproductive autonomy for this patient population.

Key Words: Fertility preservation; Pregnancy management; Organ transplantation; Cryopreservation; Assisted reproductive technology; Immunosuppressive therapy; Reproductive health

Core Tip: Fertility preservation and pregnancy management in transplant patients require an inter disciplinary approach integrating advancements in reproductive medicine and transplant care. Innovations such as cryopreservation, personalized immunosuppressive protocols, and pre-conception counseling have significantly improved outcomes. Addressing unique challenges like graft function and fetal health, these strategies offer transplant recipients the opportunity to achieve parenthood safely. Continued research and collaboration are essential to refine care models and enhance reproductive autonomy in this population.



INTRODUCTION

Since the first human-to-human organ transplantation was performed in the 20th century, a lot of research has been done. Despite the low successful rate of organ transplantations in the early years, in contemporary times, recipients have years of normal life[1]. The number of transplants worldwide is increasing. The Global Observatory of Donation and Transplantation database shows an almost tripled number of transplantations in Europe and the Americas between 2000 and 2023[2]. Thus, the number of reproductive-age recipients also increases. According to the Health Resources & Services Administration, the majority of the patients on the waiting list for organ transplantation are aged between 50 and 64 years old (nearly 60%). Still, the proportion of those of reproductive age (18-49) is more than 33%. In addition, 2.8% are at child and adolescent age, and if transplanted successfully, they are likely to survive to adulthood[3].

Transplant patients are prescribed certain medicines for a long time or even a lifetime, including immunosuppressive drugs, to prevent rejection of the graft. These medications could affect their fertility in several ways: Change in hormonal levels or damaging the gonadal cells and make natural conception harder or even no possible; teratogenicity due to maternal exposure during pregnancy or paternal exposure before conception; certain pregnancy complications like miscarriage, eclampsia, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and requirement of Cesarean delivery[4-6].

There are also ethical challenges for fertility preservation, achievement, and management of successful pregnancy among individuals who have undergone organ transplantation. Pregnancy in transplant women could increase the risk of graft rejection during pregnancy or postpartum and may make them eligible for re-transplantation. In addition, there is a risk for the fetus, especially when the pregnancies are unintended, and the medicines received by both parents are not adapted[7].

Alongside the psychosocial challenges before, during, and after transplantation, fertility preservation, conception, pregnancy, and birth add additional burdens to the patients[8]. Fertility treatment causes psychological distress to the couples involved in it. Thus, emotional support could address these new needs[9].

Recent innovations in fertility preservation and pregnancy management in transplant patients could help toman age these concerns. They could be applied in the pre-conception period to decrease the damage of immunosuppressive treatment on gonadal tissue. Modern approaches could be used for assisted conception, pregnancy management, and outcomes. Lowering the risks for the mothers and fetuses will also add ethical and psychological challenges. This review comprehensively describes the recent innovations and strategies in fertility preservation and pregnancy management, specifically for transplant patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

To identify relevant studies on the topic, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The search included a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords, systematically organized using Boolean operators to maximize retrieval of pertinent research.

The search query was constructed to address three key components: The population of interest, the innovative interventions, and the focus on pregnancy management. For the population, terms such as "transplant patients," "organ transplantation," and "solid organ transplant recipients" were used. For interventions, terms included "fertility preservation," "ovarian tissue cryopreservation," "testicular tissue cryopreservation," and "innovative reproductive techniques." The pregnancy management component was explored using terms such as "pregnancy management," "pregnancy outcomes," "maternal-fetal medicine," and "high-risk pregnancy care."

A representative search string was as follows: ("transplant patients" OR "organ transplantation" OR" solid organ transplant recipients") AND ("fertility preservation" OR "ovarian tissue cryopreservation" OR" testicular tissue cryopreservation" OR "innovative reproductive techniques") AND ("pregnancy management" OR "pregnancy outcomes" OR "maternal-fetal medicine" OR "high-risk pregnancy care").

Filters were applied to focus on relevant studies, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, guidelines, narrative reviews, case reports and original articles published in the last decades to capture recent advancements (from 2000 up to date). Each database's specific syntax and filters were tailored accordingly, with MeSH terms prioritized in PubMed and subject headings emphasized in Scopus and Web of Science. Additionally, the reference lists of key articles were manually screened to identify further relevant studies. The inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing innovative reproductive and pregnancy managements strategies specifically for transplant patients. Exclusion criteria omitted studies unrelated to the target population or lacking innovation in fertility preservation and pregnancy care.

The process of identification, screening and selection of papers to include is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Identification, screening and selection of papers included in the review.
FERTILITY PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES

Fertility preservation techniques are important for transplant patients who are often subjected to high doses of chemotherapy or immuno-suppression that are damaging to the reproductive system. The main established approaches to fertility preservation are as follows: Ovarian tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and sperm cryopreservation.

OVARIAN TISSUE AND OOCYTECRYOPRESERVATION

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation involves surgically removing ovarian tissue, which is then frozen for future use. The tissue can later be reimplanted to restore the natural hormone production and potentially fertility, which can provide a significant option for prepubertal girls and patients who cannot delay their treatments for other fertility preservation methods. Oocyte cryopreservation, in contrast, involves stimulating the ovaries, retrieving mature eggs, and freezing them. According to recent observations, the outcome of live births from these procedures has improved due to new freezing techniques such as vitrification, which eliminates crystals, hence improving survival rates after thawing[10,11]. There are still questions about the application of ovarian tissue cryopreservation as it is still mostly in the experimental stage. However, it has been used in several high-risk cases, including patients diagnosed with Turner's syndrome, which indicates potential use in the transplant population[10].

IVF

IVF is another common fertility preservation method, which is particularly appropriate for patients who are undergoing less invasive transplant series or have a good ovarian reserve. The process requires the patient to be given medication to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs, collected and fertilized in the laboratory, and the fertilized embryos are cryopreserved. In the case of transplant patients, in particular, those without aggressive treatments but with plans for them soon, IVF presents a viable solution for fertility preservation with proven advantages and success rates[12].

Modern approaches include 3D culture systems for in vitro maturation that better approximate the ovarian natural environment and utilize tissue engineering scaffolds, organ-on-chip models and others that are appropriate when there are problems such as primary ovarian insufficiency, ovarian cancer, etc.[13].

SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION

Sperm cryopreservation is widely used for male patients, especially pre-transplant, as the process is very straightforward and involves minimal intervention. The protocol typically includes sperm collection and freezing, which can be done very fast and with high post-thaw viability. Sperm preservation has shown high efficacy in terms of successful future fertilization, with protocols optimized to improve outcomes even after prolonged freezing periods[14]. This technique provides are liable fertility preservation option for men who may face gonadotoxic treatments as part of their transplant procedures.

EMERGING AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES

The new emerging techniques in fertility preservation aim to widen the options for those patients who, due to particular medical considerations or other circumstances, cannot benefit from traditional methods. This category involves follicular activation and culture, testicular tissue preservation, and a few experimental applications in gene therapy and regenerative medicine.

Follicular activation and culture

Follicular activation and culture involve the stimulation of dormant follicles to mature in vitro, offering the potential for patients with reduced ovarian reserve or those who may not be candidates for oocyte retrieval before transplant. The main focus of this technique is activating the primordial follicles in ovarian tissue through targeted molecular signaling pathways and culturing these follicles in a lab environment to allow maturation. Studies show that in vitro follicular activation may significantly enhance fertility options for transplant patients by increasing the availability of viable eggs, even in cases with minimal ovarian reserve[15]. These methods are still in the experimenting stage, but they represent promising avenues for expanding fertility options in challenging medical cases.

Testicular tissue preservation

For prepubertal males who lack mature sperm for standard cryopreservation, testicular tissue preservation presents an appealing solution. The technique itself involves cryopreserving immature testicular tissue with spermatogonia stem cells, which can later be used to restore spermatogenesis after reimplantation or in vitro maturation. Early-stage studies on animal models have demonstrated success in creating viable sperm from preserved testicular tissue. The current ongoing research aims to translate these findings to human applications[16]. If successfully implemented, testicular tissue preservation could significantly expand fertility preservation options for young male transplant patients.

Gene therapy and regenerative medicine

The application of gene editing and regenerative medicine in fertility preservation holds potential for patients with severe reproductive damage due to high-risk transplants or treatments. Contemporary gene editing techniques like CRISPR and stem cell-based regenerative therapies are being explored to repair or regenerate damaged reproductive tissues. For example, approaches based on stem cells could potentially restore ovarian or testicular function by generating new gametes or supporting tissue. At the same time, gene editing could address specific genetic or epigenetic issues affecting fertility. While these technologies are still largely theoretical in the context of human fertility preservation, early-stage research suggests they could play a significant role in future fertility strategies for transplant patients with extensive reproductive challenges[12].

Table 1 presents the advantages and limitations of fertility preservation techniques for transplant patients[17-22].

Table 1 Innovations in fertility preservation and pregnancy management for transplant patients, along with their successes and limitations/challenges.
Innovation
Successes
Limitations/challenges
Ref.
Oocyte cryopreservationSuccessful long-term storage of oocytes before transplant proceduresPotential risk of ovarian failure due to immunosuppressive therapy[17]
Offers female transplant patients the possibility of future fertility optionsLimited knowledge of the effects of cryopreservation on oocyte quality post-transplant
Embryo cryopreservationHigh success rates of pregnancy post-transplant when embryos are used after fertilizationEthical concerns and challenges with donor sperm/eggs
Suitable for patients undergoing fertility treatment before transplantationRequires hormonal stimulation, which may not be possible for all transplant patients due to their medical conditions
Testicular tissue cryopreservationSuccess in preserving fertility in male transplant patientsLimited access and expertise in cryopreservation of testicular tissue
Potential to preserve the ability for future sperm retrieval even after the transplantUncertainty of long-term success in fertility restoration
IVFAllows transplant patients to use their gametes or preserved embryos to conceiveIVF may not be feasible for all patients due to immunosuppressive therapy or health complications
Hormonal manipulation during pregnancyModifies immunosuppressive therapy to reduce risks during pregnancy, leading to successful pregnanciesRisk of graft rejection or complications in maintaining immune balance
Tailored immunosuppression protocols can enhance pregnancy outcomes for transplant patientsHormonal therapies can have side effects that complicate pregnancy
Genetic counselingHelps patients understand the risks of inherited diseases or the effects of transplantation on offspringLimited access to specialized genetic counseling in some regions
Provides a clear understanding of pregnancy and fertility options for transplant patientsEmotional and psychological challenges for patients in dealing with possible outcomes
Pre-implantation genetic testingIdentifies genetic disorders in embryos, reducing the risk of inherited conditions in offspringHigh cost and limited availability of testing
Helps to choose the healthiest embryos, which is crucial in transplant patients with compromised healthEthical concerns surrounding genetic screening and selection
Pregnancy monitoring post-transplantAdvanced monitoring technologies help track graft function and fetal development simultaneouslyThe increased complexity of monitoring, especially in immunosuppressed patients, may increase medical burden
Early intervention and personalized care plans can improve pregnancy outcomes for transplant patientsRisk of complications, including organ rejection and infection, remains a challenge
COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND LIMITATIONS

There are strengths and weaknesses in each approach to fertility preservation relative to the benefit for transplant patients. The methods are well-practiced and often successful-ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation, IVF, and sperm freezing-commonly restore fertility through protocols that have been established over decades. New methods, including the activation of dormant follicles, testicular tissue preservation, and gene therapies, offer new perspectives. Those still-experimental methods, though, are stymied by technical roadblocks and a patchwork of regulations. They seem more promising yet are not currently as consistently effective as tried-and-true methods[10,12].

PREGNANCY MANAGEMENT FOR TRANSPLANT PATIENTS AND PRE-CONCEPTION COUNSELING ANDMULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE
Assessment and risk analysis

Transplant candidates interested in pregnancy should undergo comprehensive pre-conception health screening and risk stratification. This usually includes assessing transplantation organ health and function, checking current drugs, and looking for any concomitant health disorders that could be potentially dangerous. As an example given by Turkyilmaz et al[23], kidney transplant patients will routinely perform renal function tests to assess the compatibility of the kidney to the physiological challenge of pregnancy, and liver transplant patients may need supplementary liver function tests. Pre-conception evaluations enable patients and clinicians to appreciate better the possible risks encountered so that they can take appropriate steps in advance to prepare optimally for the unique challenges of post-transplant pregnancy.

Multidisciplinary teams

Multidisciplinary team participation is essential for caring for transplant patients during pregnancy. This team comprises specialists in high-risk pregnancy (OB-GYNs), nephrologists and immunologists, and sometimes cardiologists or hepatologists if required. Each expert brings their expertise to develop an optimized, personalized care plan. For example, immunologists try to configure immunosuppressive agents to avoid allograft rejection while preserving the pregnancy. Adjunctive communication between these experts is critical to look ahead and predict and manage potential complications, thus improving chances of successful mother and baby outcomes, as noted by Chandra et al[24].

Patient education and counseling

Education and counseling are key to giving transplant patients a voice to make informed pregnancy decisions. By causing them to receive pre-conception counseling, patients learn the risks, required lifestyle changes, and the need for drug adherence. These sessions deal with the main topics, e.g., identification of symptoms, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, infection risk, etc. Physicians may promote a partnership in which the patients are actively involved in their treatment by educating and accustoming them with the knowledge and techniques for caring for themselves throughout pregnancy, as demonstrated by Carretto et al[25].

MEDICATION ADJUSTMENTS ANDMONITORING
Immunosuppressive therapy

Changing immunosuppressive therapy is critical in pregnancy care for transplant recipients as immunosuppressive therapy is critical in preventing organ rejection but may be a risk to fetal development. Drugs, e.g., mycophenolate mofetil, are generally avoided during pregnancy because they pose teratogenic risks, and safer agents (e.g., azathioprine) are commonly substituted[26]. During pregnancy, doses may need to be modified due to physiological changes in drug metabolism and distribution. Careful balancing is necessary to deliver enough immunosuppression to protect the graft while reducing possible harm to the fetus. However, no approved protocols exist, and no comparison between the various immunosuppression medications suggests a strategy regarding the level adjustment.

Monitoring protocols

Close monitoring of maternal and fetal health is essential. Protocols typically involve routine ultrasounds to evaluate fetal growth, amniotic/hydrops, and placental compromise, as well as routine laboratory tests to monitor organ function and immune suppressive therapy levels. This vigilance is noted in the study conducted by Kittleson et al[27], who identified and treated early manifestations of complications such as preeclampsia, anemia, or impaired organ function and thus allowed early intervention. Monitoring procedures are often individualized to the patient's clinical state and the type of transplant provided to anticipate and address particular needs during pregnancy.

Preventive measures

Preventive measures focus on managing common complications such as hypertension, gestational diabetes, and infections. Lifestyle changes, such as diet and physical exercise, are recommended to keep blood pressure and glucose within normal range. Vaccination and infection screening are also essential protective measures since susceptible patients with a weakened immune system (i.e., immunosuppressed patients) are more likely to develop serious infections. Also, constant monitoring for any evidence of graft rejection continues to be very important, as noted by Marzec et al[28]. Since the immune response can still change due to the influence of pregnancy, which might increase the risk.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR DIFFERENTORGANS

Transplantation organs should be taken into account individually to manage pregnancy. For instance, renal transplant recipients require careful renal function monitoring as pregnancy is an extrinsic stress on the kidneys. Liver transplant recipients can be subjected to more frequent liver enzyme testing to detect early hepatocellular dysfunction. In contrast, patients undergoing cardiac transplantation carry with them their own cardiac risk and particular cardiovascular requirements that must be explored with particular investigations and, possibly, a continuation of the drug control regime to ensure good cardiac health, as reviewed by Misra et al[29]. These personalized care approaches are tailored to address the unique risk associated with subtypes of transplant to achieve better maternal and infant outcomes.

We also have to mention uterus transplantation in this regard. Itis an entirely different kind of transplantation than the solid organ transplantations that we discuss in this review, as this allows for improving fertility. It was shown that appropriate donor and recipient selection is time-consuming and needs careful preparation. Thrombosis, infection, vaginal stricture, prenatal problems, and graft failure are among the issues that have been reported in the recipient. Although it happens often, graft rejection seldom ever results in graft removal. Although the majority of embryo transfers are successful, patients who have received uterine transplants have experienced repeated implantation failures. Although preterm delivery rates are high, they seem to decline; more information is required, especially long-term outcome statistics. In conclusion, absolute uterine factor infertility, for which there were no prior effective treatment options, is now being treated via uterus transplantation. It is critical that reproductive health[30].

OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS
Fertility and pregnancy outcomes

Many transplant patients can now achieve pregnancy safely with live birth rates comparable with the general population in the presence of carefully focused care, as seen in the paper by Kallapur et al[26]. Additionally, Chandra et al[24] suggested that kidney and liver transplant recipients can achieve positive pregnancy results. Still, there is a nominally greater risk of preterm outcome due to the complexity of pregnancy in light of immunosuppression and underlying disease. So far, improved monitoring and medical interventions have enabled pregnancy in transplant recipients to be considered safer, yet close integration with medical providers is still necessary.

Dyulgerova-nikolova et al[31] recently presented results from their experience with oocyte cryopreservation and consequent fertility treatment. The retrospective analysis of 296 women who had oocyte freezing procedures for non-medical(social) reasons, medical conditions (oncological treatment) and oocyte donation for ten years period demonstrated that 190 women with 221 procedures vitrified their oocytes for future use (only 9.47% of them had medical conditions). In the period, 46 (24.2%) women who stored their gametes in our cryobank claimed them for assisted reproduction, leading to nine clinical pregnancies registered and 10 children born.

Complications and risks

Even when advances are made, transplant recipients remain at risk of some complications, such as preeclampsia, graft rejection, and Cesarean section. Preeclampsia is a frequent complication in transplant recipients. Still, it probably results from underlying conditions and immunosuppressive treatment. It is often a candidate for early intervention for the benefit of both mother and child, as mentioned by Kothari et al[32]. Graft rejection, despite the minimization through proper medical management, is not unexpected in patients with major physiological changes following pregnancy but continues to be a question. Medical indications, however, lead to a tendency to perform Cesarean delivery with higher proportions within all groups of transplant donors and recipients. Preventing these risks requires a multidisciplinary cooperative effort with regular monitoring and adherence to individually adjusted medical guidelines to achieve excellent maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes.

ETHICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

There are potentially competitive interests between healthcare providers, transplant patients, and their offspring. Pregnancy and delivery for transplant patients are risky not only for the mothers and the graft but also for the off spring[33]. Thus, patients should be informed of all the underlying risks. The decision should be taken together with their physician, discussing all the pros and cons. Moreover, transplant patients should be informed about the risks of unplanned pregnancies and the need for medication adjustment before conception. This is essential for the mothers and also for the fathers, as their fertility could also be affected. Furthermore, teratogenicity could also arise from paternal immunosuppressive exposure before conception[34,35].

The timing of pregnancy counseling is also important. It should start before the transplantation procedure and cover all aspects of fertility preservation, contraception if needed, conception and fertility treatment, pregnancy, and parenthood. A shared-decision approach is recommended in collaboration between physicians and patients[33].

The need for transplantation, the waiting time before the transplantation, the transplantation procedure itself and consecutive treatment, and all the risks for patients' health and graft rejection predispose a lot of stress[36]. In addition to this, fertility preservation, treatment, pregnancy, and parenthood add additional physiological load to these patients. Fertility preservation is accompanied by stressors like lack of time before the preservation procedure or uncertainty about the procedure's efficacy, and the related psychological distress affects patients' quality of life[26]. Stress and anxiety frequently accompany fertility treatment and influence couples' well-being, but the reported results are controversial. However, psychological counseling and emotional support are associated with better adjustment to the treatment procedure and its outcome[37,38]. Psychological support also copes with the stress during fertility preservation[39]. Moreover, integrating mental health professionals in fertility preservation or treatment shows promising results[40].

We must also acknowledge that the mental health of transplanted patients deteriorates independently of the reproduction status: Depression, anxiety, etc., are concomitant conditions that require management[41-43].

Family and Social Support networks could also help in coping with the emotional and practical challenges of fertility preservation and pregnancy in transplant patients. There is evidence that low social support during pregnancy leads to a higher risk of depression, anxiety, and self-harm[44]. Moreover, socials support interactions decrease stress levels among couples who underwent IVF and improve their well-being[45].

FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND RESEARCH GAPS

Transplant patients face various challenges when it comes to preserving their fertility. Time is one of them, as urgent manipulation is often a priority. Sometimes, there is no possibility for comprehensive fertility planning. Financial constraints are also challenging and can limit access to different fertility preservation methods. Emotional state can also complicate decision-making about fertility and reproduction. This is because the results of transplantation are unpredictable, which in turn leads to thoughts of uncertainty related to the possibility of infertility.

Although transplantation improves patient survival, they often experience subfertility as a consequence of toxic medical therapy[46]. For some patients, fertility preservation measures and the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) help preserve fertility. The main goal of ART is to achieve a healthy pregnancy with minimal complications for both the mother and the off spring[47].

A multidisciplinary team is needed to address the medical, psychosocial, and ethical issues associated with infertile transplant patients. Possible complications should also be anticipated, and protocols and prevention strategies should be followed to avoid them[48,49]. Individual and specific factors should be taken into account when it comes to preserving fertility. Cryopreservation of sperm in men and cryopreservation of eggs or embryos in women are some of the preferred options offered to patients interested in preserving fertility. Cryopreservation of ovarian and/or testicular tissue and hormonal stimulation offer patients the opportunity to manage infertility but are not always appropriate for all transplant patients due to their medical condition[50].

Further research efforts on the subsequent risk of infertility in transplant patients, as well as the safety of fertility preservation strategies, should be a priority. Patients must be informed and guided to utilize the available options for fertility preservation. Poor coordination between doctors and health departments leads to patients being ignorant about the procedures and uncertainty about the financial aspects of the procedure's possibilities. The obstacles we face prevent the proper implementation of good practices and should be overcome to improve patient care. Additionally, there is a need for larger, multicenter studies to validate findings and explore the long-term effects of fertility preservation techniques on transplant patients.

CONCLUSION

Innovations in fertility preservation and pregnancy management are transforming outcomes for transplant patients, offering hope for family-building while preserving long-term health. Advances in ART, tailored immunosuppressive regimens, and interdisciplinary care have made pregnancy safer for both mother and child. Future efforts should focus on optimizing protocols, enhancing access to reproductive care, and addressing ethical concerns related to this specialized population. By integrating cutting-edge technologies with patient-centered care, healthcare providers can better support transplant patients in achieving their reproductive goals, marking significant progress in this dynamic and evolving field.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Transplantation

Country of origin: Bulgaria

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

P-Reviewer: Li Y; Liu J; Tsoulfas G S-Editor: Qu XL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zheng XM

References
1.  Bezinover D, Saner F. Organ transplantation in the modern era. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:32.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  WHO-ONT  Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. 2026. Available from: https://www.transplant-observatory.org/.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Health Resources & Services Administration  Organ Donation Statistics. HRSA 2024. Available from: https://www.organdonor.gov/learn/organ-donation-statistics.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Leroy C, Rigot JM, Leroy M, Decanter C, Le Mapihan K, Parent AS, Le Guillou AC, Yakoub-Agha I, Dharancy S, Noel C, Vantyghem MC. Immunosuppressive drugs and fertility. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:136.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in RCA: 120]  [Article Influence: 12.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Horoz E, Yilmaz İ, İlbey YÖ. Possible Effects of Immunosuppressive Therapy on Male Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes After Paternal Exposure in Kidney Transplant Patients. Bezmialem Sci. 2024;12:260-265.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
6.  Abusuliman M, Olimy A, Aboeldahb M, Abusuliman A, Dawod S, Rehman S, Salem AE, Meribout S, Aloum K, Jafri SM. Pregnancy Management and Outcomes in a Small Bowel, Pancreas, and Liver Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review. Am J Case Rep. 2024;25:e945914.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Sawinski D, Ralston SJ, Coscia L, Klein CL, Wang EY, Porret P, O'Neill K, Iltis AS. Counselling, Research Gaps, and Ethical Considerations Surrounding Pregnancy in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. J Bioeth Inq. 2023;20:89-99.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Schulz K, Kroencke S. Psychosocial challenges before and after organ transplantation. Transplant Res Risk Manag. 2015;.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Sax MR, Lawson AK. Emotional Support for Infertility Patients: Integrating Mental Health Professionals in the Fertility Care Team. Women. 2022;2:68-75.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Silber SJ, Goldsmith S, Rubinoff B, Kelly E, Santos RD, Melo A, Brennan D. First successful ovarian cortex allotransplant to a Turner syndrome patient requiring immunosuppression: wide implications. Fertil Steril. 2025;123:156-163.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Erden M, Gayete-Lafuente S, Vural NA, Oktay KH. Utility and Outcomes of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Transplantation for Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2024;144:481-492.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Sacinti KG, Sadat R, Ozkavukcu S, Sonmezer M, Sonmezer M. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation as a natural means to delay menopause. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;310:2305-2313.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Chavoshinezhad N, Niknafs B. Innovations in 3D ovarian and follicle engineering for fertility preservation and restoration. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51:1004.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Zhang J, Li X, Liang R, Duan S, Yang X, Hou Y, Tian L. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation after graft failure of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: first report and literature review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1367241.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Pampanini V, Sahlin L, Holopainen E, Taskinen M, Koskela M, Vettenranta K, Vettenranta J, Laine T, Anderson C, Jahnukainen K. Factors Influencing the Timing of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation in Young Girls. Reprod Fertil. 2024;5.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Sung ZY, Liao YQ, Hou JH, Lai HH, Weng SM, Jao HW, Lu BJ, Chen CH. Advancements in fertility preservation strategies for pediatric male cancer patients: a review of cryopreservation and transplantation of immature testicular tissue. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024;22:47.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Ozcan MC, Snegovskikh V, Adamson GD. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review. Womens Health (Lond). 2022;18:17455065221074886.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Onofre J, Baert Y, Faes K, Goossens E. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue or testicular cell suspensions: a pivotal step in fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:744-761.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in RCA: 126]  [Article Influence: 14.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Gastañaga-Holguera T, Calvo M, Gómez-Irwin L, Gesto IC, González-González V, Vidaurreta M. Successful pregnancy and follow-up after in vitro fertilization of a kidney transplant patient with systemic lupus erythematosus, primary biliary cholangitis, and hypothyroidism. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021;25:657-660.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Shah S, Verma P. Overview of Pregnancy in Renal Transplant Patients. Int J Nephrol. 2016;2016:4539342.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in RCA: 63]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Lilienthal D, Cahr M. Genetic Counseling and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Deshpande NA, Coscia LA, Gomez-Lobo V, Moritz MJ, Armenti VT. Pregnancy after solid organ transplantation: a guide for obstetric management. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6:116-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Turkyilmaz G, Yasa C, Dural O, Erturk E, Kalelioglu İ, Has R, Yuksel A. Pregnancy in liver transplant recipients: A single center outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44:1882-1886.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Chandra A, Midtvedt K, Åsberg A, Eide IA. Immunosuppression and Reproductive Health After Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation. 2019;103:e325-e333.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Caretto A, Caldara R, Castiglioni MT, Scavini M, Secchi A. Pregnancy after pancreas-kidney transplantation. J Nephrol. 2020;33:1009-1018.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Kallapur A, Jang C, Yin O, Mei JY, Afshar Y. Pregnancy care in solid organ transplant recipients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;157:502-513.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Kittleson MM, DeFilippis EM, Bhagra CJ, Casale JP, Cauldwell M, Coscia LA, D'Souza R, Gaffney N, Gerovasili V, Ging P, Horsley K, Macera F, Mastrobattista JM, Paraskeva MA, Punnoose LR, Rasmusson KD, Reynaud Q, Ross HJ, Thakrar MV, Walsh MN. Reproductive health after thoracic transplantation: An ISHLT expert consensus statement. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023;42:e1-e42.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Article Influence: 12.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Marzec I, Słowakiewicz A, Gozdowska J, Tronina O, Pacholczyk M, Lisik W, Fleming A, Durlik M. Pregnancy after liver transplant: maternal and perinatal outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:627.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Misra A, Porras MP, Rajendran A, Contreras J, Scott NS. Cardio-Obstetrics: A Focused Review. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023;25:1065-1073.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Richards EG, Farrell RM, Ricci S, Perni U, Quintini C, Tzakis A, Falcone T. Uterus transplantation: state of the art in 2021. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:2251-2259.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Dyulgerova-nikolova D, Antonova I, Valkova L, Timeva T, Yunakova M, Milachich T. Aspects on Social Egg Freezing – Current State in Bulgaria. Acta Medica Bulgarica. 2024;51:14-21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
32.  Kothari S, Afshar Y, Friedman LS, Ahn J. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Pregnancy-Related Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2024;167:1033-1045.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Zhao Q, Zhang S, Yu R. Impact of Pre-Transplantation Psychological Counseling in Improving the Mental Well-Being of Patients on Hemodialysis. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:594670.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Drobnis EZ, Nangia AK. Immunosuppressants and Male Reproduction. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1034:179-210.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Perez-Garcia LF, Dolhain RJEM, Vorstenbosch S, Bramer W, van Puijenbroek E, Hazes JMW, Te Winkel B. The effect of paternal exposure to immunosuppressive drugs on sexual function, reproductive hormones, fertility, pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26:961-1001.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Kuntz K, Weinland SR, Butt Z. Psychosocial Challenges in Solid Organ Transplantation. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015;22:122-135.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Spears N, Lopes F, Stefansdottir A, Rossi V, De Felici M, Anderson RA, Klinger FG. Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:673-693.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 162]  [Cited by in RCA: 373]  [Article Influence: 74.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Paraskevi L, Antigoni S, Kleanthi G. Stress and Anxiety Levels in Couples who Undergo Fertility Treatment: a Review of Systematic Reviews. Mater Sociomed. 2021;33:60-64.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Lawson AK, Klock SC, Pavone ME, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Smith KN, Kazer RR. Psychological Counseling of Female Fertility Preservation Patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33:333-353.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 34]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Sharma A, Shrivastava D. Psychological Problems Related to Infertility. Cureus. 2022;14:e30320.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Jowsey SG, Cutshall SM, Colligan RC, Stevens SR, Kremers WK, Vasquez AR, Edwards BS, Daly RC, McGregor CG. Seligman's theory of attributional style: optimism, pessimism, and quality of life after heart transplant. Prog Transplant. 2012;22:49-55.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Ong JQL, Lim LJH, Ho RCM, Ho CSH. Depression, anxiety, and associated psychological outcomes in living organ transplant donors: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021;70:51-75.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Anil Kumar BN, Mattoo SK. Organ transplant & the psychiatrist: An overview. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141:408-416.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Bedaso A, Adams J, Peng W, Sibbritt D. The relationship between social support and mental health problems during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2021;18:162.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 174]  [Article Influence: 43.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Malina A, Głogiewicz M, Piotrowski J. Supportive Social Interactions in Infertility Treatment Decrease Cortisol Levels: Experimental Study Report. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2779.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Janssen NM, Genta MS. The effects of immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory medications on fertility, pregnancy, and lactation. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:610-619.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 178]  [Cited by in RCA: 136]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  De Pinho JC, Sauer MV. Infertility and ART after transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:1235-1250.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Szymusik I, Warzecha D, Wielgoś M, Pietrzak B. Infertility in Female and Male Solid Organ Recipients - From Diagnosis to Treatment: An Up-To-Date Review of the Literature. Ann Transplant. 2020;25:e923592.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Christianson MS, Oktay K. Advances in fertility-preservation surgery: navigating new frontiers. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:438-445.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Waimey KE, Duncan FE, Su HI, Smith K, Wallach H, Jona K, Coutifaris C, Gracia CR, Shea LD, Brannigan RE, Chang RJ, Zelinski MB, Stouffer RL, Taylor RL, Woodruff TK. Future Directions in Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation: A Report from the 2011 Oncofertility Consortium Conference. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2013;2:25-30.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in RCA: 51]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]