Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Pharmacol. Mar 9, 2016; 5(1): 15-31
Published online Mar 9, 2016. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v5.i1.15
Published online Mar 9, 2016. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v5.i1.15
Type of portal hypertension | Example | FHVP | WHVP | HVPG |
Pre-hepatic | Portal/splenic vein thrombosis | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Pre-sinusoidal | Primary biliary cirrhosis, schistosomiasis, sarcoidosis | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Sinusoidal | Alcoholic hepatitis, NASH/alcoholic/viral cirrhosis | Normal | Increased | Increased |
Post-sinusoidal | Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome | Normal | Increased | Increased |
Post-hepatic | Budd Chiari1 | - | - | - |
Heart failure | Increased | Increased | Normal |
Propanolol | Carvedilol | Nadalol | |
Proposed mechanism of action | β-1 activity to reduce cardiac output and reduce portal blood flow through splanchnic vasoconstriction viaβ-2 blockade | β-1 activity to reduce cardiac output and reduce portal blood flow through splanchnic vasoconstriction viaβ-2 blockade. Additional intrinsic α1-adrenergic activity | β-1 activity to reduce cardiac output and reduce portal blood flow through splanchnic vasoconstriction viaβ-2 blockade |
Side efffects/cautions1 | Hypotension, bradycardia, caution in peripheral vascular disease/asthma. | Hypotension (more profound than others), bradycardia, caution in peripheral vascular disease/asthma. | Hypotension, bradycardia, caution in peripheral vascular disease/asthma. |
To be discontinued at time of SBP, renal impairment and hypotension1 | To be discontinued at time of SBP, renal impairment and hypotension1 | To be discontinued at time of SBP, renal impairment and hypotension1 | |
Indications | Primary prophylaxis of variceal haemorrhage (Level 1A, grade A). In combination with VBL for secondary prevention (Level 1a, grade A)2 | Primary prophylaxis of variceal haemorrhage (Level 1a, grade A). In combination with VBL for secondary prevention (Level 1b, grade B)2 | Primary prophylaxis of variceal haemorrhage (Level 1a, grade A). In combination with VBL for secondary prevention (Level 1a, grade A)2 |
Dose | 40 mg BD if tolerated or once HR < 50-55 bpm | 12.5 mg OD if tolerated or once HR < 50-55 bpm | 40mg OD (maximum dose 240 mg) or once HR < 50-55 bpm |
Mode of administration | Oral | Oral | Oral |
Ref. | Year, country | Study design | Findings/recommendations | Strenghts/weaknesses of study (if applicable) |
Bañares et al[57] | 2002, Spain | Randomised controlled trial | More favorable reduction of HVPG comparing carvedilol with propranolol however an increase in diuretic requirement in patients on carvedilol suggesting potential worsening of ascites | Increased requirement of diuretic not a hard end-point |
Sersté et al[20] | 2010, France | Single centre observational prospective case study | Patients on NSBB in refractory ascites having higher 1-year mortality than those not on NSBB | Non-randomised Lack of haemodynamic data. No competing risk analysis |
Mandorfer et al[90] | 2014, Australia | Single centre retrospective study | NSBB associated with higher transplant free survival but increase in renal dysfunction and mortality following episode of SBP | Groups not well matched at baseline with NSBB group having higher bilirubin in subgroup analysis |
Leithead et al[22] | 2015, United Kingdom | Single centre, retrospective case study | NSBB associated with reduced wait-list mortality and a higher likelihood of survival to transplantation | Lack of haemodynamic measurements. Non randomized. Well matched groups |
Tripathi et al[67] | 2015, United Kingdom | British guidelines | NSBB to be continued till episode of SBP, hypotension of renal failure (based on level 2b, Grade B evidence) | National guidelines based on all available evidence |
Kimer et al[99] | 2015, Denmark | 61 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (following a review of 14 trials) | No survival difference in patients on/not NSBBs in patient cohorts with ascites | Small retrospective analysis |
de Franchis[25] | 2015, International | Meeting consensus statements | NSBB dose reduction or discontinuation can be considered if hypotension/hyponatraemia or renal function impairment in patients with refractory ascites. If a clear precipitant for these (e.g., SBP), NSBB can be restarted once parameters normalised | International consensus statements based on evidence |
Robins et al[98] | 2014, United Kingdom | Letter - retrospective review of 114 patients undergoing LVP | No significant difference in survival comparing patients on NSBB and those not | Small retrospective series |
Bossen et al[101] | 2015, Denmark and France | Post-hoc analysis of 3 RCTs | NSBBs not associated with increase in mortality in patients with cirrhosis and ascites Cessation of NSBB linked thereafter to increase in mortality due to liver decompensation events | Multicentre trials, 3 RCTs, large data set and reflective of real world experience. Lack of haemodyamic studies and assessment of severity of portal hypertension. NSBBs stopped during admission so? true reflection of their effects on mortality |
- Citation: Rajoriya N, Tripathi D. Non-selective beta-blockers in cirrhosis: Current concepts and controversies. World J Pharmacol 2016; 5(1): 15-31
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3192/full/v5/i1/15.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5497/wjp.v5.i1.15