Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Pharmacol. Jun 9, 2015; 4(2): 193-209
Published online Jun 9, 2015. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v4.i2.193
Published online Jun 9, 2015. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v4.i2.193
Table 1 Pharmacokinetics and ageing
| Absorption | ↓ amount of saliva |
| ↑ gastric pH | |
| ↓ gastric acid secretion | |
| ↑ gastric emptying time | |
| ↓ gastric surface area | |
| ↓ gastrointestinal motility | |
| ↓ active transport mechanisms | |
| Distribution | ↓ cardiac output |
| ↑ peripheral vascular resistance | |
| ↓ renal blood flow | |
| ↓ hepatic blood flow | |
| ↓ body water | |
| ↑ body fat tissue | |
| ↓ serum albumin levels | |
| ↑ for lipid soluble and decrease for water soluble drugs | |
| Metabolic | ↓ microsomal hepatic oxidation |
| ↓ clearance | |
| ↑ steady state levels | |
| ↑ half lives | |
| ↑ levels of active metabolites | |
| ↓ first pass metabolism due to reduced ↓ blood flow | |
| Excretion | ↓ in renal perfusion |
| ↓ in renal size | |
| ↓ in glomerular filtration rate | |
| ↓ tubular secretion | |
| ↓ in tubular reabsorption |
Table 2 Common cytochrome P450 isoenzyme inhibitors and inducers
| Enzyme inhibitors | Enzyme inducers |
| Amiodarone | Carbamazepine |
| Allopurinol | Ethanol |
| Cimetidine | Isoniazid |
| Citalopram, sertraline | Phenytoin |
| Ciprofloxacin | Phenobarbital |
| Diltiazem, verapamil | Rifampcin |
| Fluxetine, paroxetine | St. Johns Wort |
| Erythromycin, clarithromycin | |
| Fluconazole, ketoconazole | |
| Omeprazole | |
| Sulphonamides | |
| Grapefruit Juice |
Table 3 Common used drug classes which require dose adjustment with chronic kidney disease
| Drug class | Adjust dose in CKD stage 1-3 | Avoid in CKD stages 4 and 5 |
| ACE-inhibitors and Angiotensin 2 receptor blockers | All ACE inhibitors | Olmesartan |
| Diuretics | Potassium-sparing and thiazide diuretics | Potassium-sparing and thiazide diuretics |
| Beta-blockers | Acebutolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, nadolol, sotalol | Sotalol |
| Lipid lowering agents | Pravastatin, rosuvastatin, fibrates | Glyburide, metformin, exanitide |
| Hypoglycaemic agents | Gliclazide, acarbose, insulin, gliptins | |
| Analgesia (NSAIDs and opioids) | Codeine, tramadol, morphine, oxycodone, | All NSAIDs, pethidine |
| Psychotropic agents | Lithium, gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, vigabatrin, bupropion, duloxetine, paroxetine, venlafaxine | |
| Miscellaneous | Allopurinol, colchicine, digoxin | Dabigatran Rivaroxaban (CI stage 5, dose adjust in stage 4 CKD) Apixaban (CI stage 5, dose adjust in stage 4) |
Table 4 Age-associated changes in pharmacodynamic response to commonly prescribed drugs
| Drug type | Specific drug | Pharmacodynamic response in older people | Potential clinical consequence |
| Analgesia | Morphine | ↑ | Excessive sedation, confusion, constipation, respiratory depression |
| Anticoagulant | Warfarin Dabigatran in those ≥ 75 yr with a body weight of < 50 kg) | ↑ | Increased bleeding risk |
| Cardiovascular system drugs | Angiotensin II receptor blockers | ↑ | Hypotension |
| Diltiazem | ↑ | ||
| Enalapril | ↑ | ||
| Verapamil | ↑ | ||
| Propranolol | ↓ | ||
| Diuretics | Frusemide | ↓ | Reduced diuretic effect at standard doses |
| Bumetanide | ↑ | ||
| Psychoactive drugs | Diazepam | ↑ | Excessive sedation, confusion, postural sway, falls |
| Midazolam | ↑ | ||
| Temazepam | ↑ | ||
| Haloperidol | ↑ | ||
| Traizolam | ↑ | ||
| Others | Levodopamine | ↑ | Dyskinesia, confusion, hallucinations |
Table 5 Commonly used drugs - comparison of prescription between older and younger patients
| Drug | Typical dose in younger patient (< 65 yr) | Typical dose in older patient (≥65 yr) | Reason for different dose in the elderly |
| Anti-arrhythmics | |||
| Digoxin | Loading dose is 1-1.5 mg in divided doses over 24 h Maintenance dose 125-250 mcg OD | Loading dose is 1 mg in divided doses over 24 h Maintenance dose 62.5-125 mcg OD | Water soluble contributing to increased plasma levels in the elderly |
| Anti-coagulants | |||
| Warfarin | Standard initiation dose, e.g., 10 mg daily for two days | Lower initiation dose, e.g., 5 mg daily for two days | Increased sensitivity to anticoagulant effect |
| Dabigatran | 150 mg BD | Patient > 80 yr 110 mg BD Patient 75-80 yr 150 mg BD in setting or normal eGFR | Increased sensitivity to anticoagulant effect |
| Anti-hypertensive | |||
| Ramipril | Initiation dose 2.5 mg | Initiation dose 1.25 mg | Lower initial dose and gradual dose titration required (higher risk of ADE in the elderly) |
| Psychoactive drugs | |||
| Diazepam | 2 mg TDS | 1 mg BD | Lipid soluble with higher volume of distribution in older people thus contributing to a prolonged duration of effect |
Table 6 Important drug interactions in older patients
| Drug | Drug | Interaction | Effect |
| Anti- hypertensive agents | NSAID | NSAID antagonizes hypotensive effect | ↓ antihypertensive effect |
| Aspirin | NSAID, oral corticosteroids | ↑ risk of peptic ulceration | Peptic ulceration |
| Calcium channel blockers | Enzyme inducers | ↑ clearance of calcium channel blocker | ↓ anti-hypertensive effect |
| Digoxin | Diuretics | Diuretic-induced hypokalaemia | ↑ effect of digoxin (arrhythmia, toxicity) |
| Digoxin | Amiodarone, Ditiazem, Verapamil | ↓ clearance of digoxin | ↑ effect of digoxin (arrhythmia, toxicity) |
| TCA | Enzyme inhibitors | ↓ clearance of TCA | Arrhythmia, confusion, orthostatic hypotension, falls |
| Phenytoin | Enzyme inhibitors | ↓ clearance of phenytoin | ↑ effect of phenytoin, toxicity |
| Thyroxine | Enzyme inducers | ↑ clearance of thyroxine | ↓ effect of thyroxine |
Table 7 Key considerations when prescribing for older patients
| Use non-pharmacological treatment whenever possible |
| Include the patient (and carer where appropriate) in prescribing decisions |
| Ensure each medication has an appropriate indication and a clear therapeutic goal (this involves careful clinical assessment and appreciation of time to obtain treatment effect and life expectancy) |
| Start at the smallest dose and titrate slowly according to response and efficacy |
| Use the simplest dosing regimen (e.g., once a day preferable to three times per day) and most appropriate formulation |
| Provide verbal and written instructions on indication, time and route of administration and potential adverse effects of each medication |
| Regularly review prescriptions in the context of co-exiting disease states, concurrent medications, functional and cognitive status and therapeutic expectation |
| Be aware that new presenting symptoms may be due to an existing medication, drug-drug interaction or drug-disease interaction (avoid prescribing cascade) |
| When stopping a medication check that it can be stopped abruptly or whether it needs to be tapered, e.g., long-term steroids, benzodiazepines |
Table 8 Clinical example
| An 80-year-old lady is referred with a four day history of general malaise, nausea, vomiting and recurrent falls. Her past medical history includes paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, non-obstructive coronary artery disease, hypertension, recurrent episodes of acute gout, dependent lower limb edema and “vertigo/dizziness”. Prior to this episode she was functionally independent and had normal cognition | |||
| Her medications were as follows: Simvastatin 40 mg daily; Verapamil 240 mg daily; Quinine Sulphate 300 mg daily, Perindopril 5 mg/Indapamide 1.5 mg daily; Digoxin 250 mcg daily; Diclofenac 75 mg twice daily; Frusemide 40 mg daily; Betahistine 16 g three times per day; Paracetamol 1 g as required; Warfarin as per INR (target INR 2-3); Flurazepam 30 mg nocte. She was not taking OTC medications | |||
| On assessment she was pale and tired. Supine blood pressure was 122/70 mmHg; erect blood pressure after one minute was 92/62 mmHg | |||
| Pulse was 52 beats per minute. She had no clinical signs of congestive cardiac failure. She scored 9/10 on a short mental test score | |||
| Investigations showed a eGFR of 38 mL/min, serum potassium 2.8 mmol/L (low) and serum sodium 126 mmol/L (low). Haemoglobin was 10.2 g/dL with MCV 72fl (hypochromic microcytic anemia) | |||
| When evaluating the appropriateness of an older person’s prescription medications it is important to consider the following two questions: | |||
| 1 Is there a clinical indication for the drug? | |||
| 2 Could the drug be contributing to the presenting symptoms? | |||
| Using this approach each medication should be evaluated in turn and corrective action implemented | |||
| Medication | Clinical indication? | Contributing to presenting symptoms? | Action taken? |
| Simvastatin 40 mg | Yes (hyperlipidaemia, high cardiovascular risk) | Could cause muscle cramps and myopathy which could lead to falls (note patient prescribed quinine) | Check fasting lipid profile and creatine phosphokinase. Revise dose according to target lipid levels |
| Verapamil 240 mg | Yes (hypertension, arrhythmia) | Could cause hypotension and bradycardia. Increased risk of myopathy when prescribed with simvastatin | Consider discontinuation. Beta-blocker may be more appropriate choice as rate controlling agent |
| Quinine 300 mg | No clear indication | No | Muscle cramps may be due to statin. Review choice of statin. Discontinue Quinine |
| Perindopril 5 mg | Yes (hypertension) | Could contribute to postural hypotension and acute renal injury | Consider temporary withdrawal while investigating cause of renal dysfunction |
| Indapamide 1.5 mg | Yes (hypertension) | Could contribute to postural hypotension, acute renal injury, hyponatraemia and hypokalaemia. Can precipitate digoxin toxicity, hyperuricaemia and recurrent episodes of gout | Discontinue |
| Digoxin 250 mcg | Yes (atrial fibrillation) | Symptoms of digoxin toxicity. Dose too high given level of renal dysfunction | Discontinue. Beta-blocker may be more appropriate choice of rate controlling agent |
| Diclofenac 75 mg | Yes (acute gout) | Yes. Diclofenac may be causing renal impairment. Gastritis/peptic ulcer disease should also be considered because of nausea, vomiting and microcytic anemia. NSAIDs should not be prescribed with warfarin because of significantly increased risk of bleeding | Discontinue. Consider addition of allopurinol for gout prophylaxis |
| Frusemide 40 mg | Yes (hypertension) | Yes (hypotension, hyponatraemia, hypokalaemia, renal impairment) | Frusemide is not required as an anti-hypertensive in this patient. It has been prescribed to treat dependent lower limb edema. Leg elevation and compression stockings would be more appropriate |
| Betahistine 16 mg | No (prescribed for dizziness which is actually related to orthostatic hypotension) | No | Discontinue. No indication |
| Paracetamol 1 g | Yes (pain) | No | Continue |
| Warfarin | Yes (atrial fibrillation embolic prophylaxis) | May be contributing to anemia. Should not be co-prescribed with diclofenac as there is an increased risk of bleeding | Investigate cause of anemia. Consider future suitability for anticoagulation if high falls risk persists |
| Flurazepam 30 mg | No | Yes (falls, malaise) | Contact GP and pharmacy for prescription history. Do not suddenly discontinue because of risk of benzodiazepine withdrawal |
Table 9 Explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients
| Explicit criteria | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Beers criteria[70] | Assesses prescribing quality Useful for education | Several drugs unavailable outside United States Does not include underuse of drugs, drug-drug interactions or duplicate drugs No under-prescribing indicators |
| Beers criteria[71] | Concise explanation of inappropriateness Severity ratings of adverse outcomes Assesses prescribing quality Useful for education | Several drugs unavailable outside United States Does not include underuse of drugs, drug-drug interactions or duplicate drugs No under-prescribing indicators |
| Beers criteria[72] | Concise explanation of inappropriateness Severity ratings of adverse outcomes Can be used by computerized clinical information systems | Several drugs unavailable outside the United States Controversy over some drugs labeled as inappropriate No drug to drug interaction No drug disease interactions No under prescribing |
| Beers criteria[73] | Concise explanation of inappropriateness Structured according to therapeutic classes and organ systems Drug disease interactions | Several drugs unavailable outside United States No drug-drug interaction No under prescribing |
| STOPP/START[74] | Organised by physiological system Concise list on inappropriate medications Includes drug and disease interactions, therapeutic duplications and prescribing omissions | Does not suggest safer alternatives Does not address certain domains of prescribing, e.g., indication |
| McLeod criteria[113] | Concise list of inappropriate medications with safer alternatives suggested Useful for education | Obsolete indicators, e.g., beta blockers in heart failure No under-prescribing indicators Several drugs unavailable outside United States |
| IPET 2000 (Improved prescribing in the elderly tool)[114] | Concise Useful for education | Not comprehensive Predominantly cardiovascular and psychotropic drugs No under-prescribing indicators |
| Zhans criteria[115] | Less restrictive than previous criteria | Several drugs unavailable outside United States No drug to drug interaction No drug disease interactions No under-prescribing indicators |
| French Consensus Panel List[116] | Concise explanation of inappropriateness Includes drug duplications Safer alternatives suggested | No clinical studies to date No under prescribing |
| Rancourt[117] | 26 Drug drug interactions 10 drug duplications | Large number of criteria to get through in clinical practice Data only on long term care setting |
| Australian Prescribing Indicators Tool[118] | Includes drug duplication Includes under-prescribing | Not validated and time consuming Derived from Australian data sources limiting international applicability |
| Norwegian General Practice (NORGEP) Criteria[119] | Can be applied to medication list with no clinical information | No drug prescribing No drug-disease interactions No studies to date outside Norway |
| Priscus List[120] | Provides therapeutic alternatives Recommendations on dose adjusting and monitoring | No studies to date published outside Germany |
| Thailand Criteria[121] | Drug interactions Drug disease interactions | No studies to date outside country of origin |
- Citation: Lavan AH, O’Grady J, Gallagher PF. Appropriate prescribing in the elderly: Current perspectives. World J Pharmacol 2015; 4(2): 193-209
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3192/full/v4/i2/193.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5497/wjp.v4.i2.193
