Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Pharmacol. Dec 9, 2014; 3(4): 39-55
Published online Dec 9, 2014. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v3.i4.39
Published online Dec 9, 2014. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v3.i4.39
Compound | Compound IC50 (μmol/L) | Compound + artemisinin IC50 (nmol/L) | Ref. |
Terpenes | |||
Artemisinin | 0.033 0.022, 0.0231 | Not applicable | Liu et al[52] |
Artemisinic acid | 77.8, 61.61 | No numerical value provided; response depended on concentration of compound tested with artemisinin | Suberu et al[19] |
Arteannuin B | 3.2, 4.81 | ||
Dihydroartemisinic acid | 21.1, 17.71 | ||
Nerolidol | 94 | Interaction with artemisinin not yet tested | van Zyl et al[55] |
α-pinene | 14 | ||
1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) | 704 | ||
Limonene | 5334 | ||
Phenolic acids | |||
Chlorogenic acid | 69.4, 61.41 | No numerical value provided; response depended on concentration of compound tested with artemisinin | Suberu et al[19] |
Rosmarinic acid | 65.1, 65.01 | ||
Flavonoids | |||
Artemetin | 26 | 26 | Liu et al[52] |
Casticin | 24 | 26 | |
Cirsilineol | 23 | 22.5 | |
Chrysoplenol-D | 32 | 15 | |
Chrysoplenetin | 36 | 16 | |
Eupatorin | 65 | 30 | |
Isovitexin | 72.5, 48.11 | Interaction with artemisinin not yet tested | Suberu et al[19] |
Luteolin | 11, 122 | Lehane et al[54] | |
Kaempferol | 33, 252 | ||
Myricetin | 40, 762 | ||
Quercetin | 15, 142, 14.7, 4.11, 2.943 | ||
Ganesh et al[58] | |||
Rutin | 7.1, 3.5, 10.383 |
pACT (dried leaf A. annua tablets, ea 500 mg, 3.7 mg artemisinin/tablet) | |||||
Artemisinin dose (mg) | No. ofpatients | Leaf DW (g) | %Recrudescence | ||
Day 1 | Days 2-6 | Day 1 | Days 2-6 | ||
7.4 × 2 | 3.7 × 2 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
11.1 × 2 | 7.4 × 2 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 9.1 |
14.8 × 2 | 11.1 × 2 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 16.7 |
18.5 × 2 | 14.8 × 2 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 9.1 |
Compare to orally delivered pure artemisinin[39] | |||||
Day 1 | Day 2-7 | ||||
500 × 2 | 500 | 227 | NA | 24 |
Technology | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Synthetic AN[116] | Fully synthetic method giving AN = compound | Requires co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistance |
Lowers AN cost compared to extraction | Not yet in production | |
Needs sophisticated process | ||
Likely all under Western control | ||
Challenging patient compliance due to multiday dosing | ||
Semi-synthetic AN[117] | Semi-synthetic method giving authentic AN | Requires co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistance |
Lowers AN cost compared to extraction | Production began via Sanofi | |
Needs sophisticated process | ||
Likely all under Western control | ||
Challenging patient compliance due to multiday dosing | ||
OZ439[118] | Single dose cure insures patient compliance | Requires co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistance |
In successful Phase 2 trials | Not yet in production | |
Mechanism of action not the same as AN | Needs sophisticated process | |
Probably low cost due to full synthesis | Likely all under Western control | |
pACT[20-24] | Has its own in planta co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistance | Not yet in production |
Very low cost | Likely to meet push back from pharmaceutical industry | |
Very consistent product | Challenging patient compliance due to multiday dosing | |
Can be used to treat other diseases | ||
Can be locally owned, produced, managed, and distributed |
-
Citation: Weathers PJ, Towler M, Hassanali A, Lutgen P, Engeu PO. Dried-leaf
Artemisia annua : A practical malaria therapeutic for developing countries? World J Pharmacol 2014; 3(4): 39-55 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3192/full/v3/i4/39.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5497/wjp.v3.i4.39