Opinion Review Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Infect Dis. Oct 28, 2020; 10(4): 47-50
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.5495/wjcid.v10.i4.47
COVID-19 risk comorbidities: Time to reappraise our physical inactivity habits (again!)
Maurílio Tiradentes Dutra, Physical Education, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Brasilia, IFB, Brasilia 71250-000, DF, Brazil
ORCID number: Maurílio Tiradentes Dutra (0000-0001-6245-3337).
Author contributions: Dutra MT wrote and revised the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: There are no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Maurílio Tiradentes Dutra, PhD, Assistant Professor, Physical Education, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Brasilia, IFB, Campus Estrutural Área Especial n° 01, Quadra 16, Cidade do Automóvel/SCIA/Estrutural/DF, Brasilia 71250-000, DF, Brazil. mauriliotiradentes@gmail.com
Received: May 23, 2020
Peer-review started: May 23, 2020
First decision: August 23, 2020
Revised: September 7, 2020
Accepted: October 5, 2020
Article in press: October 5, 2020
Published online: October 28, 2020
Processing time: 157 Days and 16.9 Hours

Abstract

Infection and mortality rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are astonishing. As of September 7, 2020, more than 27 million people around the world have already been infected, with more than 890 thousand deaths. Hypertension, diabetes, and obesity are among the most reported comorbidities associated with mortality by this disease. All these comorbidities are also strongly associated with physical inactivity and sedentary behavior. On the other hand, it is known that aerobic and resistive exercises are excellent tools to prevent and manage these comorbidities. Hence, physically active people may have a better prognosis if infected by COVID-19. Also, science tried to warn about mortality and morbidity associated to physical inactivity more than 80 years ago. However, physical inactivity habits are getting more prevalent around the world. Reasons for that include social, technology, and economic development that led to large industrialization and urbanization. Along with these changes, both professional and domestic activities became less active. Consequently, health care costs related to hypokinesis are estimated to increase exponentially in various regions of the planet. Now, while facing COVID-19 pandemic, it is time to reinforce the physiological, social, and economic relevance of regular physical exercise. Therefore, urgent reappraisal of our physical inactivity habits should be done, again!

Key Words: COVID-19; Physical inactivity; Sedentarism; Exercise; Health; Economy

Core Tip: Millions of people have been infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after its outbreak in December 2019 in China, and thousands of them have died around the world. These astonishing happenings forced the World Health Organization to declare a pandemic. Of note, older people and those with comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes are at higher risk. Regular exercise is an excellent tool to manage all those comorbidities as well as to boost human immune system, preparing people to fight infections. However, people are getting more sedentary in the last decades! During COVID-19 pandemic, we must reappraise our inactivity habits to improve health and to minimize costs to public health systems.



INTRODUCTION

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 results in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)[1]. The outbreak of the disease occurred in China in December 2019. Infection and mortality rates of this pandemic around the world are astonishing. As of September 7, 2020, more than 27 million people around the world have already been infected, with more than 890 thousand deaths. United States, India, Brazil, and Russia are the most infected countries at this point with more than 1 million confirmed cases[2].

Older individuals are at higher risk of poor clinical outcomes related to the disease[1]. However, several other risk factors have been associated to COVID-19 severity. Of note, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity are among the most reported comorbidities associated to high mortality rates[3,4]. For instance, Zhou et al[1] found that hypertension (30% of patients) and diabetes (19% of patients) were the most common comorbidities in a sample of 191 patients from Wuhan. A nationwide study from China with more than 1500 patients confirmed those data showing that hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (17%), followed by diabetes (8%)[5]. Finally, data from 5700 patients from the New York City area showed that hypertension (57%), obesity (42%), and diabetes (34%) were the most common comorbidities[6].

Interestingly, all these comorbidities, including age, are also strongly associated with physical inactivity and sedentary behavior[7,8]. On the other hand, it is widely known that physical exercise, both aerobic and resistive, is an excellent tool to prevent and manage these comorbidities[9]. In addition, immune system can be boosted with regular exercise, with an additional anti-inflammatory effect[10,11]. This could also contribute to fighting the inflammatory/cytokine storm of COVID-19[3].

Hence, even though there are so many aspects to account for, it is not hard to infer that physically active people may have a better prognosis if infected by COVID-19. However, despite the worldwide awareness about the health benefits of exercise, physical inactivity habits are getting more prevalent around the world[12]. Why is that? And what are we going to do, in terms of physical activity, after this pandemic is under control?

FIRST THINGS FIRST: WE WERE DESIGNED TO MOVE

Some generations ago, physical activity was part of humans’ daily life and survival. We “walked, ran, lifted and carried, we pushed and pulled; we dug, harvested and gathered; we danced, jumped and climbed. But things have changed-We have changed”[13]. Well, what, and when did we change?

Briefly, we can say that social, technology, and economic development through the last two centuries brought industrialization and urbanization in a large scale to most countries. Along with these changes, both professional and domestic activities became less active[13]: Too much sitting at work, too much time driving inside a car, and too much television at home[8]. More recently, too much smartphones and notebooks are everywhere. Hence, main opportunities to maintain physical activity are in moments of leisure[13]. Unfortunately, it seems like things are worsening.

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVELS PROJECTION

There is growing evidence that sedentarism has increased in the last decade[12]. Thus, projections of physical activity levels (PALs) are not promising. In developed countries, such as United States and United Kingdom, PALs are expected to reduce by 46% and 35%, respectively, until 2030. In countries with emergent economies, such as Brazil, China, India, and Russia, reduction in PALs until 2030 is expected to reach 34%, 51%, 14%, and 32%, respectively[13]. In other words, even though we were designed to move, we are getting more sedentary, and counting! The big problem is that this lack of physical activity is not without consequences and costs.

Besides the increased risk of COVID-19 comorbidities associated with physical inactivity[7,8], strong and recent evidence shows that the risk of all-cause mortality is also closely related to it. For instance, individuals watching television ≥ 4 h per day present 80% increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality[14]. If we look closely, we will see that this information is not new. We have been warned of the risks of physical inactivity to the cardiovascular system and mortality since the 1950s with the work of Morris and Crawford[15] and then in the 1980s with the work of Paffenbarger et al[16]. Briefly, these publications showed that physical activity may prevent coronary disease and increase longevity compared to sedentary or people engaged in less active work.

Moreover, economic consequences of physical inactivity are high to the public health systems. For instance, in Canada, physical inactivity represents 3.7% of the overall health care costs. In China, more than 15% of both medical and non-medical costs per year are attributable to physical inactivity[8]. In contrast, small changes in physical inactivity levels can be strongly beneficial. In Australia, for example, it was estimated that a 10% reduction in inactivity levels would result in a 96 million (Australian dollars) reduction in health sector costs per year, allied with an increase in work force production[17]. Yet, it is estimated that, until 2030, health care costs related to inactivity will increase around 113% and 61% in the European Union Association and United Kingdom, respectively; whereas in Brazil and China, these values are expected to reach 182% and 453%, respectively. To be more specific, by 2030, the direct costs related to inactivity consequences in United States, Russia, and Brazil are expected to reach 191, 3.4, and 6.2 billion dollars, respectively[13].

TIME TO REAPPRAISE PHYSICAL INACTIVITY HABITS

So, evidence shows that COVID-19 mortality rates are higher among people with comorbidities. Also, it is known that physical inactivity and sedentary behavior lead to the appearance of these COVID-19 deadly comorbidities, especially hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. Yet, even though scientific-based information was already available about physical activity health and economic benefits, humankind is becoming more sedentary and less prepared, from a physiological perspective, to fight a hazardous infection like COVID-19. Thus, while facing this pandemic, it is time to think about the physiological, health, social, and economic relevance of regular and well oriented physical exercise. Of note, literature shows that people who exercise with direct professional supervision and periodized exercise schemes present greater adaptations compared with low supervision and non-periodized training[18,19]. This highlights the relevance of investments in this area. It is also relevant to point that some exercises are safe to be performed indoor while social distance is still recommended. Yoga, low intensity body weight exercises, and active video games are amongst the options.

CONCLUSION

Urgent reappraisal of our physical inactivity habits should be done, again!

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Infectious diseases

Country/Territory of origin: Brazil

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Luqman Z S-Editor: Chen XF L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Wu YXJ

References
1.  Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054-1062.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17476]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17778]  [Article Influence: 4444.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Worldometer  Coronavirus. 2020. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Bornstein SR, Dalan R, Hopkins D, Mingrone G, Boehm BO. Endocrine and metabolic link to coronavirus infection. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16:297-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 230]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 249]  [Article Influence: 62.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:e21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1758]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1920]  [Article Influence: 480.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, Liu XQ, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Ou CQ, Li L, Chen PY, Sang L, Wang W, Li JF, Li CC, Ou LM, Cheng B, Xiong S, Ni ZY, Xiang J, Hu Y, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Cheng LL, Ye F, Li SY, Zheng JP, Zhang NF, Zhong NS, He JX; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55:2000547.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1711]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2137]  [Article Influence: 534.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW; the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium; Barnaby DP; Becker LB; Chelico JD; Cohen SL; Cookingham J; Coppa K; Diefenbach MA; Dominello AJ; Duer-Hefele J; Falzon L; Gitlin J; Hajizadeh N; Harvin TG; Hirschwerk DA; Kim EJ; Kozel ZM; Marrast LM; Mogavero JN; Osorio GA; Qiu M; Zanos TP. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323:2052-2059.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6024]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6359]  [Article Influence: 1589.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Wullems JA, Verschueren SM, Degens H, Morse CI, Onambélé GL. A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures. Biogerontology. 2016;17:547-565.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 10.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  González K, Fuentes J, Márquez JL. Physical Inactivity, Sedentary Behavior and Chronic Diseases. Korean J Fam Med. 2017;38:111-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 156]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 161]  [Article Influence: 23.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Fiuza-Luces C, Garatachea N, Berger NA, Lucia A. Exercise is the real polypill. Physiology28:330-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 270]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 328]  [Article Influence: 32.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:607-615.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1148]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1401]  [Article Influence: 107.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Campbell JP, Turner JE. Debunking the Myth of Exercise-Induced Immune Suppression: Redefining the Impact of Exercise on Immunological Health Across the Lifespan. Front Immunol. 2018;9:648.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 280]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 350]  [Article Influence: 58.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Medina C, Tolentino-Mayo L, López-Ridaura R, Barquera S. Evidence of increasing sedentarism in Mexico City during the last decade: Sitting time prevalence, trends, and associations with obesity and diabetes. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188518.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  NIKE NEWS  Designed to Move. 2012. Available from: https://news.nike.com/news/designed-to-move.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Lavie CJ, Ozemek C, Carbone S, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN. Sedentary Behavior, Exercise, and Cardiovascular Health. Circ Res. 2019;124:799-815.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 465]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 797]  [Article Influence: 159.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Morris JN, Crawford MD. Coronary heart disease and physical activity of work; evidence of a national necropsy survey. Br Med J. 1958;2:1485-1496.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 307]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 325]  [Article Influence: 13.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Hsieh CC. Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:605-613.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1713]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1456]  [Article Influence: 38.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Cadilhac DA, Cumming TB, Sheppard L, Pearce DC, Carter R, Magnus A. The economic benefits of reducing physical inactivity: an Australian example. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:99.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Gentil P, Bottaro M. Influence of supervision ratio on muscle adaptations to resistance training in nontrained subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:639-643.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Williams TD, Tolusso DV, Fedewa MV, Esco MR. Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017;47:2083-2100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 14.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]