Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Exp Med. Jun 20, 2026; 16(2): 117853
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v16.i2.117853
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v16.i2.117853
Table 1 Demographic data of the studied cases
| Variables | Total cases, n = 50 | Patients’ subgroups | P value | |
| GHD group (n = 24) | ISS (n = 26) | |||
| Age/years | 0.324 | |||
| mean ± SD | 10.3 ± 2.91 | 9.83 ± 3.37 | 10.73 ± 2.39 | |
| Sex, n (%) | 0.616 | |||
| Male | 17 (34) | 9 (37.5) | 8 (30.8) | |
| Females | 33 (66) | 15 (62.5) | 18 (69.2) | |
| Weight/kg | 0.099 | |||
| mean ± SD | 26.67 ± 9.72 | 25.08 ± 9.8 | 28.13 ± 9.6 | |
| Weight Z score | 0.207 | |||
| Median (IQR) | -1.7 (-2.8 to -1.29) | -1.835 (-3.2 to -1.35) | -1.55 (-2.02 to -1.26) | |
| Height/cm | 0.180 | |||
| mean ± SD | 121.86 ± 14.79 | 118.46 ± 16.94 | 125 ± 11.98 | |
| Height Z score | 0.129 | |||
| mean ± SD | -2.77 ± 0.61 | -2.88 ± 0.59 | -2.68 ± 0.63 | |
| BMI | 0.831 | |||
| mean ± SD | 17.37 ± 3.73 | 17.49 ± 3.86 | 17.26 ± 3.68 | |
| BMI Z score | 0.977 | |||
| Median (IQR) | -0.16 (-1.12 to 0.29) | -0.12 (-1.4 to 0.25) | -0.235 (-0.8 to 0.39) | |
| Mid parenteral height | 0.846 | |||
| mean ± SD | 165.93 ± 7.51 | 165.77 ± 7.31 | 166.08 ± 7.83 | |
| IGF (ng/mL) | 0.662 | |||
| mean ± SD | 169.77 ± 38.39 | 165.73 ± 39.71 | 173.49 ± 37.52 | |
| IGF Z score | 0.727 | |||
| Median (IQR) | -0.87 (-1.4 to 0.53) | 0.53 (-0.39 to 1.44) | 0.9 (0.46 to 1.54) | |
| Chronological age - bone age/years | 0.537 | |||
| mean ± SD | 2.49 ± 0.88 | 2.54 ± 0.59 | 2.44 ± 1.1 | |
Table 2 Comparing the percentage of cases with optimal growth hormone response (≥ 10 ng/mL) in different provocative tests in each test sample, n (%)
| Sampling time | Insulin tolerance test (n = 50) | Clonidine test (n = 50) | L-DOPA test (n = 50) | P value |
| Basal sample | 2 (4) | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0.773 |
| Sample 2 (30 minutes) | 5 (10) | 3 (6) | 5 (10) | 0.714 |
| Sample 3 (45 minutes) | 6 (12) | 6 (12) | 1 (2) | 0.121 |
| Sample 4 (60 minutes) | 3 (6) | 4 (8) | 7 (14) | 0.359 |
| Sample 5 (90 minutes) | 1 (2) | 11 (22) | 3 (6) | 0.001a |
| Sample 6 (120 minutes) | 3 (6) | 7 (14) | 3 (6) | 0.259 |
Table 3 Optimal cut-off points of peak growth hormone responses to provocative tests, %
| Variables | AUC | Cut-off, ng/mL | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
| GH provocation test by insulin | 0.764 | 7.54 | 59.3 | 91.3 | 65.6 | 88.9 | 74 |
| GH provocation test by clonidine | 0.844 | 8.48 | 77.8 | 82.6 | 76 | 84 | 80 |
| GH provocation test by L-DOPA | 0.755 | 4.63 | 80 | 70 | 84.6 | 66.7 | 76 |
- Citation: Ahmed AEA, Hassan MH, Hamdan RS, Sakhr HM. Evaluation of growth hormone provocative tests in Egyptian children with growth hormone-related short stature. World J Exp Med 2026; 16(2): 117853
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315x/full/v16/i2/117853.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v16.i2.117853