Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Exp Med. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 102761
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.102761
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.102761
Table 1 Baseline clinical and pathological information of patients with breast cancer
Breast cancer characteristics | Patients | |
n | % | |
T stage | ||
Т in situ | 4 | 2.7 |
Т1в | 11 | 7.5 |
Т1с | 89 | 60.1 |
Т2 | 44 | 29.7 |
N stage | ||
N0 | 81 | 54.7 |
N1 | 47 | 31.8 |
N2 | 16 | 10.8 |
N3 | 4 | 2.7 |
Histology | ||
Ductal | 134 | 90.5 |
Lobular | 2 | 1.4 |
Papillary | 4 | 2.7 |
Mucinous | 4 | 2.7 |
Intraductal | 4 | 2.7 |
Grade (G) | ||
G1 | 16 | 10.8 |
G2 | 91 | 61.5 |
G3 | 41 | 27.7 |
Lymphovascular invasion | ||
Yes | 84 | 56.8 |
No | 64 | 43.2 |
Perineural invasion | ||
Yes | 115 | 77.7 |
No | 33 | 22.3 |
Molecular biological subtype | ||
Luminal A | 56 | 37.8 |
Luminal B HER2-negative | 66 | 44.6 |
Luminal B HER2-positive | 10 | 6.8 |
Non-luminal HER2-positive | 10 | 6.8 |
TNBC | 6 | 4.0 |
ER status | ||
Negative | 16 | 10.8 |
Positive | 132 | 89.2 |
PR status | ||
Negative | 41 | 27.7 |
Positive | 107 | 72.3 |
HER2 status | ||
Negative | 128 | 85.5 |
Positive | 20 | 14.5 |
Table 2 Distribution of patients with programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1-positive lymphocyte score < 3 and ≥ 3, n (%)
Breast cancer characteristics | PDCD1 LG1+ LF score | P value χ² tests | |
< 3 | ≥ 3 | ||
T stage | |||
Т in situ | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | 0.50 |
Т1в | 2 (18.2) | 9 (81.8) | |
Т1с | 27 (30.3) | 62 (69.7) | |
Т2 | 12 (27.3) | 32 (72.7) | |
N stage | |||
N0 | 16 (19.7) | 65 (80.3) | 0.03 |
N1 | 19 (40.4) | 28 (59.6) | |
N2 | 6 (37.5) | 10 (62.5) | |
N3 | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
Tumor grade (G) | |||
G1 | 6 (37.5) | 10 (62.5) | 0.47 |
G2 | 26 (28.6) | 65 (71.4) | |
G3 | 9 (21.9) | 32 (78.1) | |
Lymphovascular invasion | |||
No | 18 (21.4) | 66 (78.6) | 0.05 |
Yes | 23 (35.9) | 41 (64.1) | |
Perineural invasion | |||
No | 31 (27.0) | 84 (73.0) | 0.70 |
Yes | 10 (30.3) | 23 (69.7) | |
ER status | |||
Negative | 3 (18.7) | 13 (81.3) | 0.39 |
Positive | 38 (28.8) | 94 (71.2) | |
PR status | |||
Negative | 15 (36.6) | 2 (63.4) | 0.13 |
Positive | 26 (24.3) | 81 (75.7) | |
HER2 status | |||
HER2- | 39 (30.5) | 89 (69.5) | 0.05 |
HER2+ | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | |
Molecular biological subtype | |||
Luminal A | 18 (32.1) | 38 (67.9) | 0.26 |
Luminal B HER2- | 20 (30.3) | 46 (69.7) | |
Luminal B HER2+ | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | |
Non-luminal HER2+ | 2 (20.0) | 8 (80.0) | |
TNBC | 1 (16.7) | 5 (83.3) |
Table 3 Distribution of patients with and without nuclear expression of programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 in peritumoral lymphocytes, n (%)
Breast cancer characteristics | Nuclear expression of PDCD1 LG1 in peritumoral lymphocytes | P value χ² tests | |
Absent | Present | ||
T stage | |||
Т in situ | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | 0.69 |
Т1в | 2 (18.2) | 9 (8.18) | |
Т1с | 12 (13.5) | 77 (86.5) | |
Т2 | 4 (9.1) | 40 (90.9) | |
N stage | |||
N0 | 8 (9.9) | 73 (90.1) | 0.57 |
N1 | 8 (17.0) | 39 (83.0) | |
N2 | 2 (12.5) | 14 (87.5) | |
N3 | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
Tumor grade (G) | |||
G1 | 4 (25.0) | 12 (75.0) | 0.15 |
G2 | 8 (8.8) | 83 (91.2) | |
G3 | 6 (14.6) | 35 (85.4) | |
Lymphovascular invasion | |||
No | 6 (7.1) | 78 (92.9) | 0.03 |
Yes | 12 (18.8) | 52 (81.2) | |
Perineural invasion | |||
No | 12 (10.4) | 103 (89.6) | 0.23 |
Yes | 6 (18.2) | 27 (81.8) | |
ER status | |||
Negative | 0 (0) | 16 (100) | 0.11 |
Positive | 18 (13.6) | 114 (86.4) | |
PR status | |||
Negative | 10 (24.4) | 31 (75.6) | 0.004 |
Positive | 8 (7.5) | 99 (92.5) | |
HER2 status | |||
HER2- | 18 (14.1) | 110 (85.9) | 0.07 |
HER2+ | 0 (0) | 20 (100) | |
Molecular biological subtype | |||
Luminal A | 6 (10.7) | 50 (89.3) | 0.20 |
Luminal B HER2- | 12 (18.2) | 54 (81.8) | |
Luminal B HER2+ | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | |
Nonluminal HER2+ | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | |
TNBC | 0 (0) | 6 (100) |
Table 4 Distribution of patients with different degrees of programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1-positive polymorphic cell infiltration, n (%)
Breast cancer characteristics | Degrees of PDCD1 LG1+ polymorphic cell infiltrations | P value χ² tests | |
No, weak | Moderate, pronounced | ||
T stage | |||
Тis | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | 0.02 |
Т1в | 4 (36.4) | 7 (63.6) | |
Т1с | 59 (66.3) | 30 (33.7) | |
Т2 | 36 (81.8) | 8 (18.2) | |
N stage | |||
N0 | 58 (71.6) | 23 (28.4) | 0.70 |
N1 | 31 (66.0) | 16 (34.0) | |
N2 | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | |
N3 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
Tumor grade (G) | |||
G1 | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 0.09 |
G2 | 68 (74.7) | 23 (25.3) | |
G3 | 23 (56.1) | 18 (43.9) | |
Lymphovascular invasion | |||
No | 60 (71.4) | 24 (28.6) | 0.34 |
Yes | 41 (64.1) | 23 (35.9) | |
Perineural invasion | |||
No | 79 (68.7) | 36 (31.3) | 0.82 |
Yes | 22 (66.7) | 11 (33.3) | |
ER status | |||
Negative | 5 (31.3) | 11 (68.7) | 0.0008 |
Positive | 96 (72.7) | 36 (27.3) | |
PR status | |||
Negative | 25 (60.9) | 16 (39.0) | 0.23 |
Positive | 76 (71.0) | 31 (29.0) | |
HER2 status | |||
HER2 - | 99 (77.3) | 29 (22.7) | < 0.00001 |
HER2+ | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | |
Molecular biological subtype | |||
Luminal A | 42 (75.0) | 14 (25.0) | < 0.00001 |
Luminal B HER2- | 54 (81.8) | 12 (18.2) | |
Luminal B HER2+ | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | |
Nonluminal HER2+ | 2 (20.0) | 8 (80.0) | |
TNBC | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) |
Table 5 Distribution of patients with and without programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1-positive fibroblastic stroma, n (%)
Breast cancer characteristics | PDCD1 LG1+ fibroblastic stroma | P value χ² tests | |
Absent | Present | ||
T stage | |||
Т in situ | 4 (100) | 0 (0) | 0.026 |
Т1в | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) | |
Т1с | 59 (66.3) | 30 (33.7) | |
Т2 | 38 (86.4) | 6 (13.6) | |
N stage | |||
N0 | 60 (74.1) | 21 (25.9) | 0.73 |
N1 | 33 (70.2) | 14 (29.8) | |
N2 | 12 (75.0) | 4 (25.0) | |
N3 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
Tumor grade (G) | |||
G1 | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 0.61 |
G2 | 66 (72.5) | 25 (27.5) | |
G3 | 31 (75.6) | 10 (24.4) | |
Lymphovascular invasion | |||
No | 63 (75.0) | 21 (25.0) | 0.39 |
Yes | 44 (68.8) | 20 (31.2) | |
Perineural invasion | |||
No | 80 (69.6) | 35 (30.4) | 0.16 |
Yes | 27 (81.8) | 6 (18.2) | |
ER status | |||
Negative | 8 (50.0) | 8 (50.0) | 0.03 |
Positive | 99 (75.0) | 33 (25.0) | |
PR status | |||
Negative | 31 (75.6) | 10 (24.4) | 0.57 |
Positive | 76 (71.0) | 31 (29.0) | |
HER2 status | |||
HER2 - | 99 (77.3) | 29 (22.6) | 0.0005 |
HER2+ | 8 (40.0) | 12 (60.0) | |
Molecular biological subtype | |||
Luminal A | 44 (78.6) | 12 (21.4) | 0.004 |
Luminal B HER2- | 52 (78.8) | 14 (21.2) | |
Luminal B HER2+ | 3 (30.0) | 7 (70.0) | |
Non-luminal HER2+ | 5 (50.0) | 5 (50.0) | |
TNBC | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) |
Table 6 Distribution of patients with and without programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 expression in the endothelial cells of tumor microvessels, n (%)
Breast cancer characteristics | PDCD1 LG1 expression in endothelial cells of tumor microvessels | P value χ² tests | |
Absent | Present | ||
T stage | |||
Т in situ | 2 (50.0) | 5 (50.0) | 0.06 |
Т1в | 4 (36.4) | 7 (63.6) | |
Т1с | 57 (64.0) | 32 (36.0) | |
Т2 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
N stage | |||
N0 | 58 (71.6) | 23 (28.4) | 0.36 |
N1 | 27 (57.5) | 20 (42.5) | |
N2 | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | |
N3 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
Tumor grade | |||
G1 | 12 (75.0) | 4 (25.0) | 0.41 |
G2 | 56 (61.5) | 35 (38.5) | |
G3 | 29 (70.7) | 12 (29.3) | |
Lymphovascular invasion | |||
No | 59 (70.2) | 25 (29.8) | 0.16 |
Yes | 38 (59.4) | 26 (40.6) | |
Perineural invasion | |||
No | 74 (64.3) | 41 (35.7) | 0.56 |
Yes | 23 (69.7) | 10 (30.3) | |
ER status | |||
Negative | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 0.78 |
Positive | 87 (65.9) | 45 (34.1) | |
PR status | |||
Negative | 29 (70.7) | 12 (29.3) | 0.41 |
Positive | 68 (63.5) | 39 (36.5) | |
HER2 status | |||
HER2 - | 87 (68.0) | 41 (32.0) | 0.11 |
HER2+ | 10 (50.0) | 10 (50.0) | |
Molecular biological subtype | |||
Luminal A | 38 (67.9) | 18 (32.1) | 0.13 |
Luminal B HER2- | 46 (69.7) | 20 (30.3) | |
Luminal B HER2+ | 3 (30.0) | 7 (70.0) | |
Non-luminal HER2+ | 7 (70.0) | 3 (30.0) | |
TNBC | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) |
Table 7 Results of the correlation analysis
Breast cancer characteristics | Gamma correlation | P value |
Т stage | -0.240 | 0.022 |
Tumor grade | -0.160 | 0.133 |
Lymphovascular invasion | 0.967 | < 0.00001 |
Perineural invasion | 0.380 | 0.003 |
ER status | 0.606 | 0.00008 |
PR status | 0.158 | 0.068 |
HER2 status | -0.359 | 0.029 |
Ki67 index | -0.114 | 0.147 |
Subtype | 0.104 | 0.28 |
PDCD1 LG1+ LF score | -0.414 | 0.0004 |
Lymphocytes with nuclear expression of PDCD1 LG1 | 0.295 | 0.12 |
PDCD1 LG1+ polymorphic cellular infiltrations | 0.151 | 0.105 |
PDCD1 LG1+ fibroblastic stroma | -0.029 | 0.796 |
PDCD1 LG1 expression in endothelial cells of tumor microvessels | 0.289 | 0.011 |
SP142+ ICs | -0.283 | 0.033 |
Table 8 Results of univariate and multivariate analyses
Breast cancer characteristics | Univariate analysis OR (95%CI) | P value | Multivariate analysis OR (95%CI) | P value |
T stage | ||||
Tis-T1b | 1 | > 0.05 | ||
T1c | 1.08 (0.43-5.81) | |||
T2 | 0.54 (0.11-3.96) | |||
Tumor grade (G) | ||||
G1 | 1 | 0.05 | ||
G2 | 1.78 (0.59-5.31) | |||
G3 | 0.86 (0.26-2.87) | |||
Lymphovascular invasion | ||||
No | 1 | < 0.00001 | 1 | < 0.00001 |
Yes | 60.26 (21.60-168.1) | 82.73 (24.02-284.89) | ||
Perineural invasion | ||||
No | 1 | 0.047 | 1 | > 0.05 |
Yes | 2.23 (1.01-4.91) | 0.28 (0.07-1.19) | ||
ER status | ||||
Negative | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | > 0.05 |
Positive | 4.08 (1.11-14.98) | 7.35 (0.91-59.45) | ||
PR status | ||||
Negative | 1 | > 0.05 | ||
Positive | 1.08 (0.25-2.23) | |||
HER2 status | ||||
HER2 - | 1 | > 0.05 | ||
HER2+ | 0.47 (0.17-1.30) | |||
Molecular biological subtype | ||||
Luminal A | 1 | > 0.05 | ||
Luminal B HER2- | 1.08 (0.53-2.21) | |||
Luminal B HER2+ | 1.73 (0.44-6.81) | |||
Нелюминальный HER2+ | 0.57 (0.16-1.21) | |||
TNBC | 1.15 (0.21-6.22) | |||
Vessels with PDCD1 LG1 expression | ||||
absent | 1 | 0.08 | ||
present | 1.81 (0.91-3.59) | |||
PDCD1 LG1+ LF score | ||||
< 3 | 1 | 0.018 | 1 | > 0.05 |
≥ 3 | 0.41 (0.20-0.86) | 0.46 (0.14-1.48) | ||
Combination of LVI and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score | ||||
LVI- and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score < 3 | 1 | 0.004 | 1 | |
LVI- and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score ≥ 3 | 0.13 (0.03-0.53) | 0.11 (0.02-0.46) | 0.003 | |
LVI+ and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score < 3 | 9.50 (2.21-40.79) | 0.002 | 11.09 (2.31-53.15) | 0.003 |
LVI+ and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score ≥ 3 | 25.33 (5.48-117.1) | < 0.00001 | 44.35 (7.35-267.5) | < 0.00001 |
Table 9 Frequency of regional lymph nodes metastases according to the combinations of programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1-positive lymphocytes score and lymphovascular invasion, n (%)
Combinations of PDCD1 LG1+ LF score and LVI | N stage | P value | |
N0 | N1-3 | ||
LVI- and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score < 3 | 12 (66.6) | 6 (33.7) | 0.00001 |
LVI- and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score ≥ 3 | 62 (93.9) | 4 (6.1) | |
LVI+ and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score < 3 | 4 (17.4) | 19 (82.6) | |
LVI+ and PDCD1 LG1+ LF score ≥ 3 | 3 (7.3) | 38 (92.7) |
Table 10 Research results assessing programmed death ligand 1 expression in breast cancer
Ref. | Number of patients/breast cancer subtype | Anti- programmed death-ligand 1 clone | Association of programmed death-ligand 1 expression with clinical and morphological characteristics of breast cancer | Association of programmed death-ligand 1expression with metastasis in regional lymph nodes |
Li et al[36], 2018 | 112/Ductal BC/subtypes not specified | Polyclonal (Abcam) | Higher in G2-G3 (P = 0.03) | Associated with the presence of metastases |
Cirqueira et al[40], 2021 | 6468/All subtypes | SP263, E1 L3N, 22C3, CAL 10, SP142, B7-H1, Polyclonal | Higher in high Ki67 (P = 0.005), HER2- BC (P = 0.001) | Associated with the absence of metastases |
Zhou et al[41], 2018 | 136 Ductal BC/All subtypes | Monoclonal (ab213524) | Higher in luminal B HER2+, HER2+ non-luminal and TNBC (P = 0.001) | Not associated with the presence of metastases |
Catacchio et al[42], 2019 | 180/All subtypes | Not specified | More often observed in lobular BC (P = 0.0287) | Not associated with the presence of metastases |
Evangelou et al[43], 2020 | 45/All subtypes | Monoclonal E1 L3N | More often observed with a tumor size of more than 2 cm (P = 0.023), G3 (P = 0.017), ER- status (P = 0.001), PR- status (P = 0.002) and Ki67 more than 20% (P = 0.030) | Not associated with the presence of metastases |
Zhang et al[37], 2020 | 4336/All subtypes | SP263, E1 L3N, 22C3, CAL 10, SP142, B7-H1, Polyclonal, NAT105, 28–8, ab58810, Abcam | More often observed in stage III (P = 0.015), ER- status (P = 0.000), HER2+ BC (P = 0.03), and higher levels of Ki67 (P = 0.000) | Associated with the presence of metastases |
Kim et al[38], 2017 | 4578/All subtypes | Abcam | Higher in G3 (P = 0.001) | Associated with the presence of metastases |
Zhang et al[39], 2017 | 2546, All subtypes | ab58810, NA, М1Н1 | Higher in G3 (P = 0.001), ER- status (P = 0.008), TNBC (P = 0.001) | Associated with the presence of metastases |
- Citation: Zubareva EY, Senchukova MA, Saidler NV. Cytoplasmic and nuclear programmed death ligand 1 expression in peritumoral stromal cells in breast cancer: Prognostic and predictive value. World J Exp Med 2025; 15(2): 102761
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315x/full/v15/i2/102761.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.102761