Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Exp Med. Jul 20, 2022; 12(4): 68-91
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68
Table 1 Demographic characteristics and mean values of clinical parameters
Demographic characteristics | Test, mean ± SD | Control, mean ± SD | |
Sex | |||
Male | 7 | ||
Female | 6 | ||
Age | 36.7 ± 12.44 | ||
PI | 0.625 ± 0.151 | 0.625 ± 0.154 | |
GI | 0.625 ± 0.164 | 0.625 ± 0.65 | |
PD | 1.75 ± 0.444 | 2.05 ± 0.6 | |
RD | 2.7 ± 0.86 | 2.9 ± 0.71 | |
RW | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.73 | |
RAL | 7.3 ± 0.8 | 7.05 ± 0.82 | |
KTW | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 1.35 ± 0.48 | |
KTT | 1.64 ± 0.237 | 1.61 ± 0.201 |
Table 2 Intergroup comparison of mean plaque scores between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using unpaired t test
Time (mo) | Group | n | mean ± SD | P value | |
0 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.625 | 0.15174 | 1.000 |
CM | 20 | 0.625 | 0.15174 | NS | |
1 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.865 | 0.13485 | 0.544 |
CM | 20 | 0.835 | 0.17252 | NS | |
3 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.6 | 0.13377 | 0.211 |
CM | 20 | 0.545 | 0.13945 | NS | |
6 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.54 | 0.12732 | 0.810 |
CM | 20 | 0.53 | 0.13416 | NS |
Table 3 Intragroup comparison of mean plaque scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 0.625 ± 0.151 | 0.001a | 0 | 0.625 ± 0.154 | 0.001a |
1 | 0.865 ± 0.134 | 1 | 0.835 ± 0.172 | ||
0 | 0.625 ± 0.151 | 0.204 | 0 | 0.625 ± 0.154 | 0.001a |
3 | 0.6 ± 0.133 | 3 | 0.545 ± 0.139 | ||
0 | 0.625 ± 0.151 | 0.001a | 0 | 0.625 ± 0.154 | 0.001a |
6 | 0.54 ± 0.127 | 6 | 0.53 ± 0.134 | ||
1 | 0.865 ± 0.134 | 0.001a | 1 | 0.835 ± 0.172 | 0.001a |
3 | 0.6 ± 0.133 | 3 | 0.545 ± 0.139 | ||
1 | 0.865 ± 0.134 | 0.001a | 1 | 0.835 ± 0.172 | 0.001a |
6 | 0.54 ± 0.127 | 6 | 0.56 ± 0.134 | ||
3 | 0.6 ± 0.133 | 0.004a | 3 | 0.545 ± 0.139 | 0.379 |
6 | 0.54 ± 0.127 | 6 | 0.56 ± 0.134 |
Table 4 Intergroup comparison of mean gingival index scores between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using unpaired t test
mo | Group | n | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.625 ± 0.16504 | 1.0 |
CM | 20 | 0.625 ± 0.16504 | NS | |
1 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.89 ± 0.14105 | 1.0 |
CM | 20 | 0.89 ± 0.18035 | NS | |
3 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.545 ± 0.1191 | 0.497 |
CM | 20 | 0.575 ± 0.15517 | NS | |
6 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.515 ± 0.14965 | 0.913 |
CM | 20 | 0.51 ± 0.13727 | NS |
Table 5 Intragroup comparison of mean gingival index scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using paired t test
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 0.625 ± 0.164 | 0.001a | 0 | 0.625 ± 0.165 | 0.001a |
1 | 0.89 ± 0.141 | 1 | 0.89 ± 0.18 | ||
0 | 0.625 ± 0.164 | 0.001a | 0 | 0.625 ± 0.165 | 0.001a |
3 | 0.545 ± 0.119 | 3 | 0.575 ± 0.155 | ||
0 | 0.625 ± 0.164 | 0.001a | 0 | 0.625 ± 0.165 | 0.001a |
6 | 0.51 ± 0.149 | 6 | 0.51 ± 0.137 | ||
1 | 0.89 ± 0.141 | 0.001a | 1 | 0.89 ± 0.18 | 0.001a |
3 | 0.545 ± 0.119 | 3 | 0.575 ± 0.155 | ||
1 | 0.89 ± 0.141 | 0.001a | 1 | 0.89 ± 0.18 | 0.001a |
6 | 0.51 ± 0.149 | 6 | 0.51 ± 0.137 | ||
3 | 0.545 ± 0.119 | 0.137 | 3 | 0.545 ± 0.155 | 0.137 |
6 | 0.51 ± 0.149 | 6 | 0.51 ± 0.137 |
Table 6 Intergroup comparison of mean pocket depth scores between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using unpaired t test
Time (mo) | Group | n | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 1.75 ± 0.44426 | 0.082 |
CM | 20 | 2.05 ± 0.60481 | NS | |
1 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 2.65 ± 0.48936 | 0.492 |
CM | 20 | 2.8 ± 0.83351 | NS | |
3 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 2.05 ± 0.22361 | 0.560 |
CM | 20 | 2.1 ± 0.30779 | NS | |
6 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 1.75 ± 0.44426 | 0.080 |
CM | 20 | 1.95 ± 0.22361 | NS |
Table 7 Intragroup comparison of mean pocket depth scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using paired t test
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 1.75 ± 0.444 | 0.001a | 0 | 2.05 ± 0.6 | 0.001a |
1 | 2.65 ± 0.489 | 1 | 2.8 ± 0.83 | ||
0 | 1.775 ± 0.444 | 0.01a | 0 | 2.05 ± 0.6 | 0.002a |
3 | 2.05 ± 0.223 | 3 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | ||
0 | 1.75 ± 0.444 | 1.0 | 0 | 2.05 ± 0.6 | 0.08 |
6 | 1.75 ± 0.444 | 6 | 1.95 ± 0.223 | ||
1 | 2.65 ± 0.489 | 0.001a | 1 | 2.8 ± 0.83 | 0.748 |
3 | 2.05 ± 0.223 | 3 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | ||
1 | 2.65 ± 0.489 | 0.001a | 1 | 2.8 ± 0.83 | 0.428 |
6 | 1.75 ± 0.444 | 6 | 1.95 ± 0.223 | ||
3 | 2.45 ± 0.223 | 0.01a | 3 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 0.001a |
6 | 1.75 ± 0.444 | 6 | 1.95 ± 0.223 |
Table 8 Intergroup comparison of mean recession depth scores between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using unpaired t test
Table 9 Intragroup comparison of mean recession depth scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using paired t test
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 2.7 ± 0.86 | 0.001a | 0 | 2.9 ± 0.71 | 0.001a |
1 | 0.25 ± 0.4 | 1 | 0.5 ± 0.51 | ||
0 | 2.7 ± 0.86 | 0.001a | 0 | 2.9 ± 0.71 | 0.001a |
3 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 3 | 0.95 ± 0.51 | ||
0 | 2.7 ± 0.86 | 0.001a | 0 | 2.9 ± 0.71 | 0.001a |
6 | 0.9 ± 0.64 | 6 | 1.3 ± 0.57 | ||
1 | 0.25 ± 0.4 | 0.021b | 1 | 0.5 ± 0.51 | 0.001a |
3 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 3 | 0.95 ± 0.51 | ||
1 | 0.025 ± 0.4 | 0.001a | 1 | 0.5 ± 0.51 | 0.001a |
6 | 0.9 ± 0.64 | 6 | 1.3 ± 0.57 | ||
3 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 0.002a | 3 | 0.95 ± 0.51 | 0.005a |
6 | 0.9 ± 0.64 | 6 | 1.3 ± 0.57 |
Table 10 Intergroup comparison of mean recession width scores between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using Mann-Whitney U test
Time (mo) | Group | n | mean ± SD | P value | |
0 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 3.5 | 0.607 | 0.400 |
CM | 20 | 3.7 | 0.733 | NS | |
1 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 0.5 | 0.889 | 0.107 |
CM | 20 | 1 | 1.026 | NS | |
3 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 1 | 1.026 | 0.080 |
CM | 20 | 1.85 | 0.875 | ||
6 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 1.65 | 1.04 | 0.001a |
CM | 20 | 2.55 | 0.759 |
Table 11 Intragroup comparison of mean recession width scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using Wilcoxon signed rank test
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 0.001a | 0 | 3.7 ± 0.73 | 0.001a |
1 | 0.5 ± 0.8 | 1 | 1 ± 1.02 | ||
0 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 0.001a | 0 | 3.7 ± 0.73 | 0.001a |
3 | 1 ± 1.02 | 3 | 1.85 ± 0.85 | ||
0 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 0.001a | 0 | 3.7 ± 0.73 | 0.001a |
6 | 1.65 ± 1.03 | 6 | 2.55 ± 0.75 | ||
1 | 0.5 ± 0.8 | 0.025b | 1 | 1 ± 1.02 | 0.004a |
3 | 1 ± 1.02 | 3 | 1.85 ± 0.85 | ||
1 | 0.5 ± 0.8 | 0.001a | 1 | 1 ± 1.02 | 0.001a |
6 | 1.65 ± 1.03 | 6 | 2.55 ± 0.75 | ||
3 | 1 ± 1.02 | 0.009a | 3 | 1.85 ± 0.85 | 0.001a |
6 | 1.65 ± 1.03 | 6 | 2.55 ± 0.75 |
Table 12 Intergroup comparison of mean relative attachment level scores between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane at different time intervals using Mann-Whitney U test
Time (mo) | Group | n | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 7.3 ± 0.801 | 0.429 |
CM | 20 | 7.05 ± 0.826 | NS | |
1 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 5.65 ± 1.348 | 0.620 |
CM | 20 | 5.4 ± 0.94 | NS | |
3 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 5.25 ± 1.293 | 0.779 |
CM | 20 | 5.05 ± 0.945 | NS | |
6 | i-PRF + CM | 20 | 5.55 ± 1.099 | 0.779 |
CM | 20 | 5.45 ± 0.826 | NS |
Table 13 Intragroup comparison of relative attachment level scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using Wilcoxon signed rank test
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 7.3 ± 0.8 | 0.001a | 0 | 7.05 ± 0.82 | 0.001a |
1 | 5.6 ± 1.3 | 1 | 5.4 ± 0.94 | ||
0 | 7.3 ± 0.8 | 0.001a | 0 | 7.05 ± 0.82 | 0.001a |
3 | 5.25 ± 1.29 | 3 | 5.05 ± 0.94 | ||
0 | 7.3 ± 0.8 | 0.001a | 0 | 7.05 ± 0.82 | 0.001a |
6 | 5.55 ± 1.09 | 6 | 5.45 ± 0.82 | ||
1 | 5.6 ± 1.3 | 0.021b | 1 | 5.4 ± 0.94 | 0.124 |
3 | 5.25 ± 1.29 | 3 | 5.05 ± 0.94 | ||
1 | 5.6 ± 1.3 | 0.589 | 1 | 5.4 ± 0.94 | 0.868 |
6 | 5.55 ± 1.06 | 6 | 5.45 ± 0.82 | ||
3 | 5.52 ± 1.29 | 0.06 | 3 | 5.05 ± 0.94 | 0.021a |
6 | 5.55 ± 1.06 | 6 | 5.45 ± 0.82 |
Table 14 Intergroup comparison of width of keratinized tissue between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane at different time intervals using Mann-Whitney U test
Table 15 Intragroup comparison of width of keratinized tissue scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using Wilcoxon signed rank test
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 0.001a | 0 | 1.35 ± 0.48 | 0.001a |
1 | 2.85 ± 0.48 | 1 | 2.45 ± 0.6 | ||
0 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 0.001a | 0 | 1.35 ± 0.48 | 0.001a |
3 | 3.5 ± 0.51 | 3 | 2.9 ± 0.44 | ||
0 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 0.001a | 0 | 1.35 ± 0.48 | 0.001a |
6 | 3.4 ± 0.59 | 6 | 2.75 ± 0.44 | ||
1 | 2.85 ± 0.48 | 0.001a | 1 | 2.45 ± 0.6 | 0.001a |
3 | 3.5 ± 0.51 | 3 | 2.9 ± 0.44 | ||
1 | 2.85 ± 0.48 | 0.001a | 1 | 2.45 ± 0.6 | 0.001a |
6 | 3.4 ± 0.59 | 6 | 2.75 ± 0.44 | ||
3 | 3.5 ± 0.51 | 0.001a | 3 | 2.9 ± 0.44 | 0.001a |
6 | 3.4 ± 0.59 | 6 | 2.75 ± 0.44 |
Table 16 Intergroup comparison of thickness of keratinized tissue scores between injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane at different time intervals using unpaired t test
Table 17 Intragroup comparison of thickness of keratinized tissue scores obtained by using injectable platelet-rich fibrin and collagen membrane at different time intervals using paired t test
i-PRF + CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value | CM in mo | mean ± SD | P value |
0 | 1.64 ± 0.237 | 0.001a | 0 | 1.61 ± 0.201 | 0.001a |
1 | 2.68 ± 0.233 | 1 | 2.11 ± 0.193 | ||
0 | 1.64 ± 0.237 | 0.001a | 0 | 1.61 ± 0.201 | 0.001a |
3 | 2.52 ± 0.211 | 3 | 2.01 ± 0.179 | ||
0 | 1.64 ± 0.237 | 0.001a | 0 | 1.61 ± 0.201 | 0.001a |
6 | 2.45 ± 0.252 | 6 | 1.91 ± 0.166 | ||
1 | 2.68 ± 0.233 | 0.001a | 1 | 2.11 ± 0.193 | 0.001a |
3 | 2.52 ± 0.211 | 3 | 2.01 ± 0.179 | ||
1 | 2.68 ± 0.233 | 0.001a | 1 | 2.11 ± 0.193 | 0.001a |
6 | 2.45 ± 0.252 | 6 | 1.91 ± 0.166 | ||
3 | 2.52 ± 0.211 | 0.001a | 3 | 2.01 ± 0.179 | 0.001a |
6 | 2.45 ± 0.252 | 6 | 1.91 ± 0.166 |
Table 18 Overall percentage of root coverage in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month in patients treated with injectable platelet-rich fibrin + collagen membrane and collagen membrane respectively
Group | Month 1 | Month 3 | Month 6 |
i-PRF + CM | 91.6 | 81.6 | 67 |
CM | 82.3 | 66.4 | 53.95 |
- Citation: Patra L, Raj SC, Katti N, Mohanty D, Pradhan SS, Tabassum S, Mishra AK, Patnaik K, Mahapatra A. Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage. World J Exp Med 2022; 12(4): 68-91
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315x/full/v12/i4/68.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68