Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Exp Med. Sep 20, 2025; 15(3): 108467
Published online Sep 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i3.108467
Published online Sep 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i3.108467
Table 1 PICOS criteria for study determination
| Parameter | Description |
| Population | Adults with diabetes |
| Intervention | Fixed triple probiotic combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium bifidum (either as single therapy or in combination with other therapies) |
| Comparator | Either placebo, any standard therapy alone, or any other supplementation other than the fixed triple probiotic combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium bifidum |
| Outcomes | 1 Glycaemic parameters |
| a: Serum glucose level | |
| b: Serum insulin level | |
| c: Insulin resistance level (HOMA-IR score) | |
| d: Insulin sensitivity level (QUICKI score) | |
| e: Pancreatic β-cell functioning (HOMA-B score) | |
| 2 Antioxidant parameters | |
| a: Total antioxidant capacity level | |
| b: Glutathione level | |
| c: Malondialdehyde level | |
| d: Nitric oxide level | |
| e: High sensitivity C-reactive protein level | |
| 3 Lipid parameters | |
| a: Total cholesterol level | |
| b: Triglycerides level | |
| c: Low-density lipoprotein level | |
| d: Very low-density lipoprotein level | |
| e: High-density lipoprotein level | |
| f: Total cholesterol/High-density lipoprotein level ratio | |
| Study design | Randomized controlled clinical study |
| Study questions | 1 Is the triple probiotic combination effective in reducing insulin resistance and improving serum glucose and insulin level in patients with diabetes? |
| 2 Is the triple probiotic combination effective in reducing oxidative stress and improving antioxidant potential in patients with diabetes? | |
| 3 Is the triple probiotic combination effective in improving lipid parameters in patients with diabetes? |
Table 2 Characteristics of included studies
| Ref. | Population | Age (range in years) | Gender | Sample size (active/control) | Intervention | Study duration | |
| Active group | Control group | ||||||
| Soleimani et al[29] | Dia-Hem | 18–80 | Male and female | 30/30 | Triple probiotic supplement (6 × 109 CFU) | No details present | 12 weeks |
| Soleimani et al[30] | Dia-Hem | 18–80 | Male and female | 30/30 | Triple probiotic supplement (6 × 109 CFU) + Inulin 0.8 gm | Starch | 12 weeks |
| Tajabadi-Ebrahimi et al[31] | Dia-CHD | 40–85 | No details present | 30/30 | Triple probiotic supplement (6 × 109 CFU) + Inulin 800 mg | Starch | 12 weeks |
| Raygan et al[32] | Dia-CHD | 40–85 | No details present | 30/30 | Triple probiotic supplement (6 × 109 CFU) | No details present | 12 weeks |
| Farrokhian et al[33] | Dia-CHD | 40–85 | Male and female | 30/30 | Triple probiotic supplement (6 × 109 CFU) + Inulin 800 mg | Starch | 12 weeks |
Table 3 Quality assessment of included studies
| Parameters | Ref. | ||||
| [29] | [30] | [31] | [32] | [33] | |
| Eligibility criteria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Random allocation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Concealed allocation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Baseline similarity | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Subject blinding | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Therapist blinding | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Assessor blinding | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| < 15% dropouts | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Intention-to-treat analysis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Between-group statistics | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Point measures and variability | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall score | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
- Citation: Dubey VP, Kansagra JJ, Kamani BK, Sureja VP. Triple probiotic combination effect on metabolic, oxidative stress, and inflammatory parameters in diabetic population: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Exp Med 2025; 15(3): 108467
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315X/full/v15/i3/108467.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v15.i3.108467
