Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Crit Care Med. Oct 16, 2019; 8(6): 87-98
Published online Oct 16, 2019. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v8.i6.87
Table 1 Pharmacology of direct thrombin inhibitors
ValenceThrombin bindingOnset of actionHalf-lifeProtein bindingMetabolismSpecial considerations
BivalirudinBivalentReversible2-4 min25 minNoneSerum proteasesAvoid during low-flow states Removed by non-diffusive dialysis modalities Dose reductions necessary in renal dysfunction
ArgatrobanUnivalentReversible30 min45 min20% albumin 34% alpha-acid glycoproteinHepatic (hydroxylation, aromatization)Dose reductions necessary in hepatic dysfunction
Table 2 Summary of studies reporting on argatroban in adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
First author, YearStudy typePopulationCircuit (VA/VV)CRRTBolus dose (mg/kg)Initial infusion (mg/kg/min)MonitoringDurationMajor bleedingThrombosisOther adverse eventsOutcome
Jyoti et al[21], 2013Case report54M ARDS, HITVVNoNA0.6ACT 200-220 s aPTT 60-80 s552 h (23 d)NANANA
Pappalardo et al[23], 2009Case report71F post-cardiotomy, HITVANo0.50.5ACT 180-220 s6 dNAVentricular fibrillation due to LA thrombus, suspected to be due to heparin in tubing with residual HIT. BIV dosing increasedNADecannulated and discharged in stable condition
Pieri et al[24], 2013Case controln = 10 (4 HIT)VV (n = 5) VA (n = 5)n = 7 (70%)N/A0.025aPTT 45-60 s8 d (range 6-23)n = 3 (30%)n = 1 (10%)No difference in bleeding or thrombosis compared to UFH patients Less dose corrections than UFH Less supra-therapeutic aPTTs than UFHn = 4 (40%) died
Berei et al[20], 2018Retrospectiven = 44 CS (n = 37) Sepsis (n = 11) Respiratory (n = 3) Mixed (n = 4)VA (n = 26) VV (n = 2)n = 17 (39%)UFH 80 units/kg at cannulation No BIV bolus0.04aPTT 45-65 s (low intensity) or 60-80 s (high intensity)156.9 h (mean)n = 20 (45.5%)n = 10 (22.7%)Increased flow rates during first 96 h High intensity BIV had more TTR with no difference in outcomesNo difference in death at 30 d between BIV and UFH (36% vs 32%)
Netley et al[22], 2017Retrospectiven = 11 ARDS (n = 8) ECLS (n = 3)VA (n = 4) VV (n = 7)n = 4 (36%)NA2.5aPTT 40-60 s, 50-70 s, or 60-80 sMean 9.9 d (range 4-22)n = 8 (72.7%)n = 2 (18.2%), both after hospital dischargeNAn = 5 (45%) died after withdrawal of care n = 6 (55%) discharged from hospital
Ranucci et al[25], 2011Retrospectiven = 8, post-cardiotomyVANANA0.03-0.05 ½ dose if reduced CrClACT 160-180 s or aPTT 50-80 s or TEG r 12-30 min39-262 hNANoneBleeding not reported, but less average blood loss (mL/kg/d) in BIV patientsn = 2 (25%) survived n = 2 (25%) dead on ECMO n = 4 (50%) weaned but died
Walker et al[26], 2019Retrospectiven = 14 ARDS (n = 12) Post-cardiotomy (n =2) HIT (n = 11/13)VV (n = 11) VA (n = 3)n = 6 (43%)0.2 (n = 1, others NA)0.04-0.26aPTT 1.5-2.5 × baselineMedian 5.2 d (range 0.9-28.4 d)n = 4 (29%)Circuit clotting (n = 5, 36%)Infusion held during major bleeding episodes with no need for correction Higher infusion rates noted with CRRTn = 9 (64%) decannulated n = 7 (50%) survived to discharge
Table 3 Summary of studies reporting on argatroban in adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
First author, YearStudy typePopulationCircuit (VA/VV)CRRTBolus doseInitial infusionMonitoringDurationMajorbleedingThrombosisOther adverse eventsOutcome
Sin et al[37], 2017Case report27M ARDS, HITVVYesNA0.2 µg/kg/minaPTT 50-60 s60 dHemothorax developed while on heparin, resolved on ARGA day 27NoneTransient elevations in liver enzymes, no clinical consequencePatient transferred for lung transplantation
Ratzlaff et al[35], 2016Case report58M ARDS, HITVVNoNA0.1-0.3 µg/kg/minaPTT 60-90 s11 dNoneNoneNAWithdrawal of care after 28 d of ECMO support
Johnston et al[34], 2002Case report32M CS, HITVANo10 mg2 µg/kg/hACT 200-400 s aPTT 80-90 s7 dNoneNANADecannulated on ECMO day 10
Dolch et al[32], 2010Case report40M ARDS, HITVVNoNA0.35 µg/kg/minaPTT 45-60 s108 dMajor bleeding after lung transplant (ECMO day 114) – ARGA heldNAHepatic failure post-transplant Infusion reduced to 0.02 µg/kg/minPatient underwent lung transplant on ECMO day 114, complicated by graft failure Died on post-operative day 17 (multi-organ failure)
Fernandes et al[33], 2019Case report44M CS, HITVAYesNA1.5 mg/haPTT 60-70 s20 dMediastinal bleeding due to pulmonary edema Massive intraoperative hemorrhage during LVAD insertion, DICLV and RV thrombus during intraoperative DICNASurvived to discharge
Cornell et al[31], 2007Case seriesn = 4 with HIT ARDS (n = 3) CS (n = 1)VA (n = 2) VV (n = 2)NoNA0.2-2.0 µg/kg/minACT 210-230 s88-184 hMajor bleeding (n = 2)NANASurvival to discharge (n = 2, 50%) Death (n = 2, 50%)
Beiderlinden et al[30], 2007Case seriesn = 9 with ARDS, HITVVn = 8NA2.0 µg/kg/min (n = 1) 0.2 µg/kg/min (n = 8)aPTT 50-60 s4 ± 1 d (mean)Major bleeding (n = 1) in patient who received higher initial infusion doseNoneNASurvived (n = 6) Died (n = 3)
Rougé et al[36], 2017Case series49M CS, HIT 69M ARDS, HITVAn = 1NA0.2 µg/kg/min 1 µg/kg/minaPTT 1.5-3.0 × baseline10 d 8 dNACircuit clotting (n = 1)ALF requiring dose reductionSurvived (n = 1) Decannulated, but died prior to discharge (n = 1)
Menk et al[38], 2017Retrospectiven = 34 ARDS, HIT or heparin resistanceVV (n = 24) pECLA (n = 9)NANA0.3 µg/kg/minaPTT 50-75 s265 h (131-460)n = 11—no differences compared to matched UFH cohortn = 6—no differences compared to matched UFH cohortNAn = 21 (54%) died