Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Crit Care Med. Feb 4, 2017; 6(1): 65-73
Published online Feb 4, 2017. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.65
Published online Feb 4, 2017. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.65
Table 1 Univariate analysis of demographic, clinical characteristics and outcomes of the study population according to method of administration of hydrocortisone
| Characteristics | Continuous infusion (n = 32) | IV bolus (n = 32) | P value |
| Age, median (IQR) | 50 (37-64) | 61 (39-70) | 0.19 |
| Male gender, n (%) | 12 (37.5) | 14 (51.9) | 0.27 |
| Oncologic disease, n (%) | 15 (46.9) | 10 (37) | 0.45 |
| Surgical patients, n (%) | 25 (78.1) | 17 (63) | 0.2 |
| Infection source, n (%) | |||
| Pneumonia | 13 (40.6) | 13 (48.1) | 0.56 |
| Ventilator associated | 7 (21.8) | 6 (22.2) | 0.87 |
| Health care associated | 3 (9.3) | 4 (12.5) | 0.66 |
| Community acquired | 3 (9.3) | 3 (11.1) | 0.52 |
| Abdomen | 14 (43.7) | 10 (37) | 0.6 |
| Soft tissue | 4 (12.5) | 1 (3.7) | 0.23 |
| Urinary tract | 1 (3.1) | 2 (7.4) | 0.45 |
| Other | 0 (0) | 1 (3.7) | 0.27 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 8 (25) | 4 (14.8) | 0.33 |
| Acute kidney injury, n (%) | 14 (43.7) | 17 (63) | 0.14 |
| Baseline creatinine, mg/dL, median (IQR) | 0.8 (0.7-1.4) | 1.1 (0.7-1.5) | 0.32 |
| ARDS, n (%) | 10 (31.2) | 11 (40.7) | 0.45 |
| APACHE II score (SD) | 21 ± 6 | 21.7 ± 5.6 | 0.76 |
| SOFA score (SD) | 10 ± 2.9 | 11 ± 2.7 | 0.16 |
| Vasopressin use, n (%) | 12 (37.5) | 4 (14.8) | 0.5 |
| Maximum NE dose (mcg/kg per minute), median (IQR) | 0.25 (0.17-0.36) | 0.33 (0.20-0.39) | 0.55 |
| Hydrocortisone dose (mg/kg per day), median (IQR) | 2.63 ± 0.27 | 2.75 ± 0.31 | 0.13 |
| NE to hydrocortisone (h), median (IQR) | 8 (4-19.5) | 14 (8-31.5) | 0.01 |
| Time to shock reversal (h), median (IQR) | 59 (47.5-90.5) | 108 (63.2-189) | 0.001 |
| Shock relapse, n (%) | 4 (18.2) | 7 (38.9) | 0.14 |
| Hydrocortisone tapered, n (%) | 10 (41.7) | 13 (68.4) | 0.08 |
| Diuretic use, n (%) | 19 (59.4) | 11 (40.7) | 0.15 |
| New onset hypernatremia, n (%) | 17 (53.1) | 18 (66.7) | 0.29 |
| New onset hypokalemia, n (%) | 12 (37.5) | 18 (66.7) | 0.02 |
| New onset hyperglycemia, n (%) | 19 (59.4) | 23 (85.2) | 0.03 |
| Superinfection, n (%) | 3 (9.4) | 5 (18.5) | 0.31 |
| Wound dehiscence, n (%) | 3 (9.4) | 2 (7.4) | 0.78 |
| UGIB, n (%) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0.35 |
| ICU-AW, n (%) | 8 (25) | 9 (33.3) | 0.48 |
| Vasopressor-free days, median (IQR) | 3 (2-5) | 2 (0-3.7) | 0.12 |
| ICU LOS, median (IQR) | 8.5 (6-13) | 9 (5-13) | 0.81 |
| 30-d mortality, n (%) | 10 (31.2) | 15 (55.6) | 0.06 |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for relevant factors associated with new-onset hyperglycemia
| Variable | Univariate | P value | Multivariate | P value | |
| NO-H (n = 42) | No NO-H (n = 17) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | |||
| Bolus hydrocortisone, n (%) | 19 (45.2) | 13 (76.5) | 0.04 | 3.2 (0.5-26.5) | 0.99 |
| Hydrocortisone taper, n (%) | 20 (64.5) | 3 (27.3) | 0.03 | 5.3 (1.8-34.5) | 0.04 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 11 (26.2) | 1 (5.9) | 0.08 | 6.2 (0.4-79.0) | 0.95 |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for relevant factors associated with new-onset hypokalemia
| Variable | Univariate | P value | Multivariate | P value | |
| NO-HK (n = 30) | No NO-HK (n = 29) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | |||
| Bolus hydrocortisone, n (%) | 12 (40) | 20 (69) | 0.02 | 8.5 (1.2-59.9) | 0.03 |
| Hydrocortisone taper, n (%) | 17 (77.3) | 6 (30) | 0.002 | 10.6 (1.5-73.3) | 0.01 |
| AKI, n (%) | 13 (43.3) | 18 (62.1) | 0.08 | 0.1 (0.01-0.8) | 0.03 |
| Diuretic use, n (%) | 20 (66.7) | 10 (34.5) | 0.01 | 6.3 (0.95-42.0) | 0.05 |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for relevant factors associated with shock reversal
| Variable | Univariate | P value | Multivariate | P value | |
| Shock reversal (n = 30) | No-reversal (n = 29) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | |||
| Age (yr), SD | 53 ± 16.3 | 50 ± 16.3 | 0.46 | ||
| Male gender, n (%) | 15 (36.6) | 11 (61.1) | 0.08 | 1.4 (0.21-10.1) | 0.68 |
| Medical disease, n (%) | 11 (26.8) | 6 (33.3) | 0.61 | ||
| Oncologic disease, n (%) | 20 (48.8) | 5 (27.8) | 0.13 | 1.0 (0.18-6.3) | 0.92 |
| AKI, n (%) | 17 (41.5) | 14 (77.8) | 0.01 | 0.3 (0.05-2.0) | 0.23 |
| ARDS, n (%) | 12 (29.3) | 9 (50) | 0.12 | 2.7 (0.4-16.9) | 0.27 |
| Superinfection, n (%) | 5 (12.2) | 3 (16.7) | 0.68 | ||
| APACHE II score (SD) | 20 ± 5.4 | 23 ± 6.4 | 0.16 | 1.1 (0.9-1.3) | 0.18 |
| SOFA score (SD) | 10 ± 3.0 | 10 ± 2.4 | 0.69 | ||
| Vasopressin use, n (%) | 10 (24.4) | 6 (33.3) | 0.48 | 2.5 (0.4-15.4) | 0.31 |
| Early hydrocortisone ( ≤ 13 h from NE), n (%) | 28 (68.3) | 2 (11.1) | 0.0001 | 13.8 (1.4-129) | 0.02 |
| NE dose at hydrocortisone initiation ≤ 0.28 μg/kg per minute, n (%) | 28 (68.3) | 2 (11.1) | 0.0001 | 32.4 (2.7-382) | 0.005 |
- Citation: Ibarra-Estrada MA, Chávez-Peña Q, Reynoso-Estrella CI, Rios-Zermeño J, Aguilera-González PE, García-Soto MA, Aguirre-Avalos G. Timing, method and discontinuation of hydrocortisone administration for septic shock patients. World J Crit Care Med 2017; 6(1): 65-73
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v6/i1/65.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.65
