Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Crit Care Med. May 4, 2013; 2(2): 9-16
Published online May 4, 2013. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v2.i2.9
Table 1 Changes in abdominal perfusion pressure, blood gases, arterial lactate and dynamic compliance during different study stages
Study stageAIVHRENDSB1 HR
APP = MAP - IBP75 (63-82)74 (66-85)82 (68-96)92 (77-98)a85 (77-96)a
APP = MAP - IGP74 (65-82)78 (67-85)74 (65-82)90 (78-97)a85 (77-96)a
PaCO2 (mmHg)36 (34-39)36 (33-42)37 (34-42)40 (38-49)a37 (35-40)
EtCO2 (mmHg)32 (29-35)30 (27-35)33 (28-36)36 (31-39)a33 (30-35)
Arterial lactate (mmol/L)0.9 (0.7-1.0)0.7 (0.6-0.8)0.8 (0.7-1.0)1.0 (0.7-1.4)0.9 (0.8-1.4)
Dynamic compliance (mL/cm H2O)32 (26-38)27 (22-32)a26 (22-30)a
Table 2 Agreement between the two techniques of intra-abdominal pressurе measurement
Number of patientsMean intra-abdominal pressureCorrelation analysis
Bland–Altman analysis
rPbiasPrecision
After tracheal intubation297.830.650.002-1.064
After ventral hernia repair289.220.730.001-0.572.8
At the end of surgery268.910.750.001-0.464.1
During spontaneous breathing through the end of tracheal tube (spontaneous breathing trial)2311.480.750.002-0.193.6
At 1 h after tracheal extubation279.70.810.001-1.003.3
Table 3 Concordance between the two intra-abdominal pressure measurements during different study stages
All measurementsAIVHRENDSB1 HR
Number of measurements1332928262327
Concordance correlation coefficient0.740.610.840.620.810.69
95%CI0.65-0.800.33-0.790.69-0.920.34-0.800.63-0.900.45-0.84
Precision0.750.630.850.650.840.73
Accuracy0.980.960.980.950.960.95