Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 102609
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.102609
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.102609
Table 1 Distribution of the study subjects based on indications for mechanical ventilation
Indications | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Airway protection | 13 | 35.1 |
Alveolar filling defect | 4 | 10.8 |
Impaired central drive | 4 | 10.8 |
Post anesthesia recovery | 7 | 18.9 |
Pulmonary vascular defect | 2 | 5.4 |
Respiratory muscle weakness | 2 | 5.4 |
Restrictive ventilatory defect | 5 | 13.5 |
Table 2 Distribution of the subjects based on the requirement of positive end expiratory pressure over the period of study
Positive end expiratory pressure | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | |
5 cm H2O (trial 1) | Yes | 37 | 100.0 |
No | 0 | 0.0 | |
10 cm H2O (trial 2) | Yes | 20 | 54.1 |
No | 17 | 45.9 | |
15 cm H2O (trial 3) | Yes | 5 | 13.5 |
No | 32 | 86.5 |
Table 3 Comparison of proportion of the subjects categorised based on lung ultrasound score over the period of study
Lung ultrasound score | Score 0 (normal) | Score 1 (well separated B-lines) | Score 2 (coalescent B-lines) | Score 3 (consolidation) | P value | ||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
Baseline (n = 37) | 0 | 0.0 | 15 | 40.5 | 16 | 43.2 | 6 | 16.2% | - |
After trial 1 (n = 37) | 17 | 45.9 | 14 | 37.8 | 6 | 16.2 | 0 | 0.0 | < 0.001 |
After trial 2 (n = 20) | 15 | 75.0 | 4 | 20.0 | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 | < 0.001 |
After trial 3 (n = 5) | 5 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.032 |
Table 4 Validity of lung ultrasound scores in assessing the aeration of lung after positive end expiratory pressure trial of 5 cm of water1
Trial 1 (n = 37) | SpO2 | ||||||
100.0% | ≤ 99.0% | Total | |||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
Lung ultrasound score | 100.0% | 16 | 43.2 | 1 | 2.7 | 17 | 45.9 |
≤ 99.0% | 0 | 0.0 | 20 | 54.1 | 20 | 54.1 | |
Total | 16 | 43.2 | 21 | 56.8 | 37 | 100.0 |
Table 5 Association between indications of mechanical ventilation and positive end expiratory pressure requirement to achieve 100% oxygen saturation
Mechanical ventilation indications | After trial 1 (n = 37) | After trial 2 (n = 20) | After trial 3 (n = 5) | |||||||||
Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Airway protection | 10 | 76.9 | 3 | 23.1 | 2 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Alveolar filling defect | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 100.0 | 1 | 25.0 | 3 | 75.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Impaired central drive | 3 | 75.0 | 1 | 25.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Post anesthesia recovery | 3 | 42.9 | 4 | 57.1 | 3 | 75.0 | 1 | 25.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Pulmonary vascular defect | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Respiratory muscle weakness | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Restrictive ventilatory defect | 0 | 0.0 | 5 | 100.0 | 3 | 60.0 | 2 | 40.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 |
P value | 0.007 | 0.598 | 0.392 |
- Citation: Anegundi SS, Kurdi MS, Sutagatti JG, Theerth KA. Role of lung ultrasound in assessing positive end expiratory pressure induced lung recruitment in patients on mechanical ventilation. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 102609
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v14/i3/102609.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.102609