Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2024; 13(3): 94157
Published online Sep 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157
Published online Sep 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157
Table 1 Causes and factors contributing to thoracic epidural failure
Causes of epidural failure | Factors contributing to failure |
Incorrect catheter placement | Misplacement into paravertebral space, pleural space, or intravascularly |
Catheters placed at the wrong level | |
Equipment failure | Debris in the catheter |
Disconnections, air locks, or knotting and kinking of the catheter | |
Epidural space characteristics and complexities | Midline fat pedicles and adhesions impeding adequate spread of local anesthetics |
Table 2 Studies discussing thoracic epidural failure
Ref. | Factors contributing to epidural failure |
Porteous et al[5] | Equipment failure, such as debris in the catheter, incorrect catheter placement, epidural space characteristics and complexities |
Motamed et al[8] | Anatomical variances, coiling and kinking of the catheter |
Hamilton et al[9] | Changes in the position of epidural catheters associated with patient movement |
Tran et al[11] | Primary failure of thoracic epidural analgesia in training centers |
Yeager et al[14] | Malposition of epidural catheters |
Tsui et al[15] | Incorrect catheter placement |
Balki et al[16] | Incorrect catheter placement |
Ghia et al[17] | Incorrect catheter placement |
Lennox et al[18] | Incorrect catheter placement |
Sánchez et al[20] | Incorrect catheter placement |
Johnson et al[21] | Incorrect catheter placement |
Table 3 Techniques for confirming thoracic epidural catheter position
Technique | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Electrophysiological stimulation | Connecting nerve stimulator to catheter | High sensitivity and effectiveness in confirming position | Requires specialized adaptor |
Applying current and assessing motor response | Correlation with adequate postoperative analgesia | Discomfort to awake patient | |
Bilateral stimulation indicates proximity to nerve root | Does not give information on local spread | ||
Limb or truncal response indicates epidural space | |||
Epidural catheter waveform | Connecting catheter to pressure transducer | Simple technique using readily available equipment | Does not provide information about catheter level or injectate spread |
Confirming epidural space when pulsatile waveform is obtained | |||
Contrast epidurography | Taking X-ray after injection of radio-opaque contrast | Confirms epidural position and assesses catheter level and spread pattern | Involves X-ray, may not be suitable for all patients |
Assessing contrast spread and catheter placement | Identifies anatomical variances and coiling/kinking | Time-consuming. Required training for epiduralgram interpretation | |
Evaluating bilateral spread and vertebral levels | Risk of transiently raising spinal cord pressure with large volumes |
Table 4 Studies done on confirming thoracic epidural catheter position
Ref. | Techniques for confirming catheter position |
Teoh et al[10] | Surface anatomy as a guide to vertebral level for thoracic epidural placement |
Yokoyama et al[13] | Evaluation of contrast medium distribution and blockade extent during epidural anesthesia |
Yeager et al[14] | Fluoroscopy-assisted epidural catheter placement |
Tsui et al[15] | Confirmation of catheter placement using nerve stimulation |
Balki et al[16] | Epidural electrical stimulation test |
Ghia et al[17] | Confirmation of catheter position using epidural pressure waveform and computed tomography catheter gram |
Lennox et al[18] | Use of pulsatile pressure waveform as a marker for confirming the location of the thoracic epidural space |
Sánchez et al[20] | Radiological visualization of catheters placed in the epidural space |
- Citation: Kumar K, Horner F, Aly M, Nair GS, Lin C. Why do thoracic epidurals fail? A literature review on thoracic epidural failure and catheter confirmation. World J Crit Care Med 2024; 13(3): 94157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v13/i3/94157.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157