Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2024; 13(1): 90746
Published online Mar 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.90746
Published online Mar 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.90746
MAC (%) | Blood:Gas at 37oC | Boiling point (oC) | Odor | Metabolism (%) | Cardiovascular effects | Central nervous system effects | |
Halothane | 0.75 | 2.4 | 122 | Organic solvent | 15-20 | Decrease CO, decrease HR | Decrease CPP, increase CBF |
Isoflurane | 1.15 | 1.4 | 48 | Ethereal/pungent | 0.2 | Decrease CO, increase HR, decrease SVR | Decrease CPP, increase CBF |
Desflurane | 6.0 | 0.4 | 23 | Ethereal/pungent | 0.02 | Increase HR, decrease SVR | Decrease CPP, increase CBF |
Sevoflurane | 2.0 | 0.68 | 59 | Organic solvent | 5 | Decrease SVR | Decrease CPP, increase CBF. Can induce epileptiform EEG |
Indication | Agents studied | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Short-term postoperative | Desflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane | Quick awakening; Faster extubation; Titratability; Minimal drug interactions; Minimal metabolism; Provides analgesia | No benefit on ICU length of stay; Reduces blood pressure |
Prolonged sedation during mechanical ventilation | Isoflurane, sevoflurane | Faster return to spontaneous breathing; Titratability; Minimal drug interactions; Minimal metabolism; Provides analgesia | Special equipment required in ICU; Reduces blood pressure |
Status asthmaticus | Isoflurane, sevoflurane | Bronchodilation | Reduces blood pressure |
Status epilepticus | Isoflurane, desflurane | Sustained EEG burst suppression | May increase intracranial pressure through cerebral vasodilation |
ARDS | Isoflurane, sevoflurane | Lung protective; Anti-inflammatory | Special equipment required in ICU; Reduces blood pressure |
COVID-19 | Isoflurane, sevoflurane | Decreased sedative, NMBA requirements | Special equipment required in ICU; Reduces blood pressure |
Other high sedative requirements (burn, alcohol or opioid use at baseline) | Isoflurane, sevoflurane | Decreased inflammation in burns; Decreased sedative requirements | Not proven in literature, hypothesis generating at this time |
Ref. | Treatment | Surgeries | Sedation duration | Time to awakening/extubation | Other outcomes |
Non-cardiac surgery | |||||
Bellgardt et al[3], 2019, Randomized trial | Isoflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 10) | Major surgery (aortic, pancreatic, esophagectomy, spinal fusion, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, necrotizing fasciitis) | 17.9 (16.6–20.6) h | NR | Isoflurane had longest awakening times followed by sevoflurane, with desflurane the shortest (open eyes, follow verbal commands, extubation, tell birthday). Desflurane was most expensive followed by sevoflurane, with isoflurane the cheapest (per hour) |
Sevoflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 10) | 16.5 (10.4–37.4) h | NR | |||
Desflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 10) | 18.8 (14.1–33.8) h | NR | |||
Jung et al[27], 2020, Prospective interventional | Sevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 25) | Head and neck surgery with tracheostomy | 771 ± 338.4 min | NR | Sevoflurane required less continuous opioid. Similar vasopressor use and length of stay |
Propofol (n = 24) | 1508 ± 2074.7 min | NR | |||
Romagnoli et al[28], 2017, Prospective interventional | Sevoflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 62) | Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted noncardiac | 3.33 (2.33–5.75) h | 4 (2.2–5) min (awakening after drug cessation) | No adverse effects. Pollution < 1 ppm at all timepoints assessed |
Cardiac surgery | |||||
Hellström et al[29], 2011, Randomized trial | Sevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 50) | Elective or subacute coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass | 176 min | NR | Sevoflurane had less intense increase in troponin at 12 h. Similar hemodynamics and length of stay |
Propofol (n = 50) | 221 min | NR | |||
Jerath et al[30], 2015, Randomized trial | Isoflurane or sevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 67) | Elective coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass | NR | 182 (140–255) min (extubation after ICU arrival) | No adverse effects. Similar hemodynamics and lengths of stay |
Propofol (n = 74) | NR | 292 (210–420) min (extubation after ICU arrival) | |||
Röhm et al[31], 2008, Randomized trial | Sevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 35) | Elective coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass | 8.1 ± 3.5 h | 9.0 ± 4.0 h (extubation after ICU arrival) | Sevoflurane had faster times of recovery after sedation cessation (eye opening, following commands, hand grip, and extubation). Similar ICU length of stay, sevoflurane with lower hospital length of stay |
Propofol (n = 35) | 8.4 ± 4.2 h | 12.5 ± 5.8 h (extubation after ICU arrival) | |||
Soro et al[32], 2012, Randomized trial | Sevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 36) | Elective coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass | NR | NR | No differences in postoperative cardiac biomarkers, hemodynamics, or lengths of stay |
Propofol (n = 37) | NR | NR | |||
Steurer et al[33], 2012, Randomized trial | Sevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 46) | Valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass | At least 4 h | NR | Sevoflurane had lower troponin T and creatine kinase concentrations on postoperative day 1 |
Propofol (n = 56) | At least 4 h | NR | |||
Wąsowicz et al[34], 2018, Randomized trial | Isoflurane (n = 30) or sevoflurane (n = 30) with AnaConDa | Elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass | NR | 172.1 ± 175.5 min (extubation after ICU arrival) | No difference in postoperative troponin values or ICU or hospital length of stay |
Propofol (n = 67) | NR | 219.6 ± 104.9 min (extubation after ICU arrival) |
- Citation: Wieruszewski ED, ElSaban M, Wieruszewski PM, Smischney NJ. Inhaled volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit. World J Crit Care Med 2024; 13(1): 90746
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v13/i1/90746.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.90746