©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 112345
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345
Figure 1 Flow chart of the study.
ILMA: Intubating laryngeal mask airway; VL: Video laryngoscope.
Figure 2 Mean arterial pressure, mean pulse rate, mean oxygen saturation in the video laryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway groups at different intervals.
A: Mean arterial pressure; B: Mean pulse rate; C: Mean oxygen saturation. ILMA: Intubating laryngeal mask airway; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; VL: Video laryngoscope; SpO2: Oxygen saturation.
- Citation: Aggarwal A, Mustahsin M, Shishir P. Comparison of intubating laryngeal mask airway and video laryngoscope during emergency intubation in patients who are critically ill. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(1): 112345
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i1/112345.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.112345
