Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2015.
    
    
        World J Surg Proced. Jul 28, 2015; 5(2): 187-197
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i2.187
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i2.187
            Table 1 Peritoneal wash cytology before and after bidirectional intraperitoneal and systemic induction chemotherapy
        
    | Cytology | Cytology after BIPSC | ||
| Before BIPSC | Negative | Positive | Total | 
| Negative | 15 | 0 | 15 | 
| Positive | 26 (79%) | 7 | 33 | 
| 41 | 7 | 48 | |
            Table 2 Peritoneal wash cytology before and after neoadjuvant intraperitoneal/systemic chemotherapy
        
    | Cytology | Cytology after NIPS | ||
| Before NIPS | Negative | Positive | Total | 
| Negative | 47 | 1 | 48 | 
| Positive | 69 (70%) | 30 | 99 | 
| 116 | 31 | 147 | |
            Table 3 Histoloogic effects of primary tumor and peritoneal carcinomatosis in 41 patients after bidirectional intraperitoneal and systemic induction chemotherapy
        
    | EF-0 | EF-1 | EF-2 | EF-3 | Total | |
| Primary tumors | 3 (12%) | 15 (58%) | 7 (27%) | 1 (4%) | 26 (100%) | 
| Peritoneal metastasis | 7 (17%) | 18 (44%) | 7 (17%) | 9 (22%) | 41 (100%) | 
            Table 4 Histoloogic effects of primary tumor and peritoneal carcinomatosis in 147 patients with PC treated with neoadjuvant intraperitoneal/systemic chemotherapy
        
    | EF-0 | EF-1 | EF-2 | EF-3 | Total | |
| Primary tumors | 13 (18%) | 38 (54%) | 20 (28%) | 0 | 71 (100%) | 
| Peritoneal metastasis | 59 (40%) | 35 (24%) | 14 (10%) | 39 (25%) | 147 (100%) | 
            Table 5 Side effects during bidirectional intraperitoneal and systemic induction chemotherapy
        
    | Grade 0 | Grade 1-2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | Total | 
| 44 (76%) | 8 (14%) | 4 (7%) | 2 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 58 | 
            Table 6 Multivariate analysis of 304 patients with peritoneal metastasis treated with a comprehensive treatmnent
        
    | Prognostic factors | χ2 | P value | HR | 95%CI | |
| Sex male vs female | 0.263 | 0.60752 | 0.9218 | 0.676 | 1.257 | 
| CC score: complete vs incomplete | 4.03 | 0.04468 | 1.504 | 1.01 | 2.24 | 
| Nodal involvement: N0-1 vs N2-3 | 0.445 | 0.50454 | 1.1338 | 0.784 | 1.639 | 
| Neoadjuvant chemo.: negative vs positive | 2.517 | 0.11259 | 1.3445 | 0.933 | 1.938 | 
| PCI: ≤ 6 vs≥ 7 | 8.809 | 0.00299 | 1.7863 | 1.218 | 2.621 | 
| HIPEC: Not done vs done | 8.218 | 0.00414 | 0.6322 | 0.462 | 0.865 | 
| Histilogicl effects: EF 0-1 vs EF 2-3 | 12.305 | 0.00045 | 0.469 | 0.307 | 0.716 | 
| Cytology: Negative vs positive | 8.2163 | 0.00415 | 1.8458 | 1.213 | 2.806 | 
- Citation: Yonemura Y, Canbay E, Endou Y, Ishibashi H, Mizumoto A, Li Y, Liu Y, Takeshita K, Ichinose M, Takao N, Saitou T, Noguchi K, Hirano M, Glehen O, Brűcher B, Sugarbaker PH. Comprehensive treatment for the peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(2): 187-197
 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2832/full/v5/i2/187.htm
 - DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5412/wjsp.v5.i2.187
 
